egorfine

6 ms·

121.
by egorfine 3mo ago
Temporary chats.
122.
by egorfine 3mo ago
Everything. The current implementation is unusable. If you see differently then probably you are looking at Codex chats, not chats .
123.
by egorfine 3mo ago
Zero information on the knowledge cutoff. The model itself responds it's June 2024 which is weird given that GPT-5.5 has knowledge cutoff at August 2025.
124.
by egorfine 3mo ago
> Intent understanding This will totally make it brain damaged over a certain tasks. Sort of like the same brain damage that prompted OpenAI project managers to destroy ChatGPT.app today.
125.
by egorfine 3mo ago
What they did to ChatGPT.app is incredible. It was a truly useful app, but the replacement is brain damaged in terms of UI/UX beyond repair. Incredible, really.
126.
by egorfine 3mo ago
I have updated Codex and it's now ChatGPT. And the chat in Codex is badly broken and doesn't support the one feature I use in almost every chat. Good job.
127.
by egorfine 3mo ago
Then why use someone else's established brand for your toy project?
128.
by egorfine 3mo ago
> suddenly single channel is 'ok' Single channel RAM surely beats any disk-based swap.
129.
by egorfine 3mo ago
This is an incredibly nice technology that absolutely will be used to prevent you from using your computer as you wish.
130.
by egorfine 3mo ago
This is a good point, actually. Might well be the reason.
131.
by egorfine 3mo ago
It's pure virtue signaling.
132.
by egorfine 3mo ago
We already have a well established term for AI rewrites.
133.
by egorfine 3mo ago
> How would one go about reviewing a piece of code like this? That's a wrong question. The right question is "why would one go about rewriting a piece of code in X". Once and if you find a good answer to that question, you
134.
by egorfine 3mo ago
> significant part of the rust community consists of software talibans I seriously don't get it though. Rust is a nice language, but so is X. However we don't see X people brigading existing projects with constant bombardment w
135.
by egorfine 3mo ago
Any chance for 1.3.15 with top bugfixes for those of us who once trusted Bun and are stuck on it in production? I have migrated almost everything out of Bun by this point but I have one single project that builds into executables with Bun a
136.
by egorfine 3mo ago
To me this whole saga stands on a very thin overlapping region between "it has merit" and "I hate it". Like, the blog post clearly explains the merits and they are strong. At the same time, I absolutely hate how the auth
137.
by egorfine 3mo ago
> Pangram is very good at distinguishing between AI-generated and human text It's not.
138.
by egorfine 3mo ago
> how much the authors now understand their project I don't think this is a value anymore for them.
139.
by egorfine 3mo ago
> Zero involvement with the Bun community Yeah. The human aspect of the transition was just incredibly bad. The person behind Bun has just demonstrated how much he values the community. But I'm sure he will build another community a
140.
by egorfine 3mo ago
> There’s no way in hell it’s maintainable There are different definitions of "maintainable". It seems the prevailing culture at Anthropic is to not touch code manually anymore. So for them "maintainable" means the LL
141.
by egorfine 3mo ago
Unfortunately (and I say this because I hate this whole rust rewrite) no. There is no fixing a third-party garbage collector on top of the non-memory-managed language. Jarred explains in a post what would that Zig look like.
142.
by egorfine 3mo ago
Judging from comments on this article: no.
143.
by egorfine 3mo ago
I find it curious that people who take other's people product and rewrite in their favorite programming language still name their own creation the name of the original one. Like, you have now created your own new database engine that h
144.
by egorfine 3mo ago
> and human involvement Isn't ironic for a project that successfully killed all past and future human involvement?
145.
by egorfine 3mo ago
> Types are a safeguard, they rule out certain errors I have migrated to TypeScript just about a year ago and it's my third try to migrate to TS from JS during the last decade and finally a successful one. While TS went a long road
146.
by egorfine 3mo ago
But only for a small percentage of world's population, right?
147.
by egorfine 3mo ago
> Depends on the revenue they bring Fifteen years! Unless it's a government agency what's the point even in doing business with a company that uses 15 y.o. browser? They will pay you in silver coins according to 2011 prices.
148.
by egorfine 3mo ago
Well this is another story.
149.
by egorfine 3mo ago
> I still have significant traffic at some clients from IE9 It's been 15 years since IE9. Where do you draw the line?
150.
by egorfine 3mo ago
Their inability to stay current does not constitute a responsibility for all of us to halt progress.

More ›