Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
egorfine
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
931.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
Ukrainian drone developers are looking at the US drone developers with a mix of disgust and confusion. Like, seriously? Does the Russo-Ukrainian war even exist for you?
932.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
By that point it should be pretty clear that anyone who opposes the one and only Right Way™ of systemd - are old and don't want to learn new ways. Obviously systemd is perfect and their philosophy is the best and not to be criticized.
933.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
It is as costly to call systemd-* garbage on HN as it is to eliminate systemd-* projects from major distros.
934.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
systemd introduced optional timers. Not long time passed and voila - cron is deprecated and hardly works today. systemd introduced optional socket activation. Boom: sshd in process list is faked on Ubuntu 22+. systemd introduced option
935.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
It does, and that's why the systemd crowd want to replace and extinguish it.
936.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
> systemd isn't meant to be an init system, it's meant to embrace and extinguish unix philosophy. > the alternative world where [] actually sucks. You should bear in mind that there are plenty of people here on HN who have
937.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
> there's no single giant program that does all this systemd crown does everything for that to be technically legally right while also making sure that and modern Linux distro is unusable without a bunch of systemd-* projects.
938.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
While there is nothing wrong with "systemctl edit" and it's a nice addition, one should bear in mind that the main goal of the whole systemd umbrella is to embrace and extinguish. The less you learn to do without systemd the
939.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
> Honestly, the biggest downside of systemd is the lack of documentation Is it truly? I have heart some other concerns that have been raised by some developers. > and the lack of wider adoption How wide would you like the adoption of
940.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
> If you want to go further, then look into What I want systemd to do is to do one thing and do it sell - launch services on boot. What systemd crowd want is to destroy as many unix foundational tools as possible, starting from cron and
941.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
> The reason for this is that it creates an override file rather than edits the systemd file directly Which is then happily ignored by systemd no matter what you do including rebooting. No thank you, it's edit the main unit and then
942.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
> pretty much every service should use `PrivateTmp=yes` Pretty much no service should use that. We have ran services without that for decades until LP crowd came and said we should.
943.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
Problem is, those new systemd "features" [1] have been shoved down our throats with little to no warning. [1] https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/sshd-now-uses-socket-based-ac...
944.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
> Should we not make our daemon run in more secure environments? I want systemd to get out of my lawn and stop adding features. It's not the job of /sbin/init to setup specifics of the secure environment. I want my init to
945.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
> in the days of structured logging and Are those days in the same room we are? Because last I have checked, logging is generally implemented as a stream of text messages with a very few bits of structured metadata. Like, almost in every
946.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
By whose definition of sanity? systemd haters often believe that it is sysvinit that was sane while it is systemd who is insane. I am one of those people but being systemd hater I'm obviously wrong because old.
947.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
> it does things the way authors wanted And let's not forget that the author of systemd is very well known for his arrogance and explicit hatred towards unix philosophy.
948.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
systemd or systemd-* projects? systemd itself is metastatic. While the systemd-as-pid1 is great, IMO other parts of it grew up way too much.
949.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
> you can adopt systemd without losing functionality Nope. No simple way to run a single simple script on boot, which lived in /etc/rc.local for decades. Create a unit instead. It's not much but systemd is full of little
950.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
> The bad news [...] with the assumption that DNS resolution is being done via systemd-resolved This is incredible, really. systemd-resolved is easily the worst piece that came out of systemd crowd. I see systemd-resolved as a transparen
951.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
> Rust has a much better Windows story than C This is an extremely strong statement. Which is so obviously factually incorrect that I tend to think you might have meant something else.
952.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
They did expect backlash, so I believe no amount will cause them to cancel. Rust fanboys( ) thrive off backlash. ( ) am myself. Love rust. Hate rust rewrites.
953.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
> It's literally a test of how people will react What's there to test? It was obvious that the reaction would be overwhelmingly negative, so that's definitely not something they would care about. What else?
954.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
> Rust is generally a much better tool for building software than C. This is an extremely strong statement. And factually incorrect.
955.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
That's a reasonable take but then keep in mind we're talking about iTerm. How is the browser different from, say, `curl https://example.com | lynx`? Or `~/.bin/playwright/chrome`? So while corporate rest
956.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
> Most bureaucrats are also humans Not for long. > high rates of occupational burnout and high employee churn See
957.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
Not Ubuntu anymore, sadly. I have tried Debian after like 15 years pause and I loved it so much more. Note: we're talking server-side Linux here. Desktop wise I would stay on Ubuntu.
958.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
> the shell is recorded and send to a central tool Challenge accepted. And it's not a huge challenge. I'd say not even a mild one.
959.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
Yeah. Fully agree. I am this close to throwing away my MacBook and migrating back to sane Linux. For the last 20 years.
960.
▲
by
egorfine
1y ago
But somehow iTerm is not.
More ›