Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
egorfine
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
19 ms
·
421.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
> Why do I file bug reports with Apple Feedback Assistant? It is known for decades that Apple largely ignores bugreports.
422.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
With age verification built in, right? right?
423.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
> The world doesn't seem to have acclimatized to well...how the world works now It has been observed that military bureaucracies will do everything in their power to ignore the fact that their experience is now obsolete and requires
424.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
> meanwhile, the United States is a nuclear weapons state This logic is outdated because it is pretty obvious that no one is going to employ nuclear warheads in a typical conventional war and thus the nuclear factor suddenly doesn't
425.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
> developed [] algorithm that solves instances with 10,000 [] in under 7 minutes on a Macbook Pro [] The prior state-of-the-art timed out at 2 hours Knowing how government IT procurement works, I'm afraid it's going to stay >
426.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
Nothing like account termination with all your corporate email with no recourse and support because fuck you that's why. Absolutely do not touch this product with a ten-foot pole.
427.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
> I plan on switching to this as soon as I can Too late.
428.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
> More reason to run your infrastructure using open source software in your own datacenter Until they stop being open source. Like, you know, LocalStack.
429.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
It's an unfortunate accident that GM sent engineers instead of lawyers. I'm sure this will be corrected soon.
430.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
> Why? Why should Linux ever implement local laws like this as core functionality? I have no idea. But they did actually bend over.
431.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
> Age verification at the OS level makes no sense to me If taken at face value, sure. The goal of those age verification laws are not age verification.
432.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
Ah, because they need to move parts today to demonstrate that the parts are movable. This is a today's foot in the today's door.
433.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
All my kids had and have unfiltered internet access. The oldest being 32 and the youngest being 12. All fine. The dangers of access to unfiltered information are certainly real but not worthy of constant worry.
434.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
This is hilarious. I had to steal this for my Twitter post.
435.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
They are. I think this is the main reason why sane people are revolting against age groups, because mandatory KYC to use a locked-down Linux begins exactly with that: a small integer field in userdb.
436.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
> You'd think by now they'd have learned, but apparently not. No. Suffering is the crucial part of virtue signaling, so bugs in slop rewrites are a feature, not a bug.
437.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
Kids want everything done their way because the way we did it is obviously wrong and old. This has always has been the case.
438.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
Yes, thankfully. However it is pretty obvious at this point that Ubuntu will absolutely remove those from one of the future releases because availability of real sudo and coreutils is detrimental to the virtue signaling they are engaging in
439.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
> You don't get the whole "why are you overturning 46 years of tradition??" nonsense Respectfully, we are the opposing sides of the barricades here. I was removing sudo-rs, uutils and some of the systemd-* packages from fr
440.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
Do you really want to be compliant to ITIL 4 or do you want to sell to your target market? I'm pretty sure you want customers who pay money, and ITIL 4 badge is just a small mean to achieve that, not a goal per se.
441.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
I think we are confusing something here. > we really wish we could buy your product but we can't because Finance won't approve the expenditure unless you get XYZ-123 So you are not dreaming about XYZ-123 compliance, you are dre
442.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
> Companies do want to be secure. I'm not sure about that. Leaking customers' data bears no meaningful penalties and has no repercussions while securely storing said data costs money, add frictions and brings nothing but expens
443.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
On an emotional level I feel the same way: I would love the company who leaked my PII die and their CEO/CTO be out of job forever. Practically I think that leaking data is inevitable. A junior developer absolutely WILL vibecode a piece
444.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
> Do you think lets say a heavy tax burden in say Italy, or even France [] is really used well and efficiently? Those two countries are textbook examples of ineffective state taxation-wise. Similar insane tax burden can be found in Scand
445.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
> somebody is rotating their key material as they provided in their security posture no. Because actually rotating keys and passing audit for rotating keys are two different things and oftentimes those two are unrelated.
446.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
> With ISO27001 or SOC 2, I have more information about the other party's ability to ... spend time and money to emulate the asinine requirements of outdated standards instead of actually making the product better and more secure. &
447.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
I think the thing we are confusing here is "compliance" vs the "highest possible standards". In theory these two terms mean the same thing. In practice compliance can be detrimental to the cause and values that you and I
448.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
> It certainly does automatically make you subject to that jurisdiction It doesn't. Laws only apply to a certain territory. So if Libya doesn't like the way I provide services to their citizens they can impose any laws they wan
449.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
> Passing the responsibility off to some other company is, quite simply, irresponsible. Then do not pass the responsibility. But here's the trick: the regulator would like to see an audit done by a firm and purchasing audit services
450.
▲
by
egorfine
7mo ago
Problem is, compliance is often detrimental to the cause. You want to encrypt users' data at rest? Illegal. You must store users data in a way prescribed by the law and it is extremely cumbersome, outdated and insecure.
More ›