Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
efilife
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
571.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
Does it matter? You said that like she's not a woman
572.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
A woman did this, a rare sight in the hacker community. That's so cool!
573.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
wow, I had no idea this exists. thank you very much
574.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
I use a custom windows build with defender removed, you can find them on any windows modding site
575.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
Why? Not trying to be rude, I don't see the comedy here
576.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
Why didn't I think of this earlier
577.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
Maybe people ignore it because there are already many tools like this. I was tempted to not look, but checked it out anyway
578.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
I don't think it's as simple for them as just keeping the thes . It's probably very context dependent
579.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
I wrote my own search engine some time ago and was impressed by how well it worked on my relatively small index. And then I see this. Marginalia's dev is just unmatched with persistence and knowledge to pull all of this off, I wouldn&#
580.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
Why is this downvoted Not anymore, I balanced it out
581.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
Then there's two of us
582.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
I don't have a problem with it but didn't see the reason. Was I toxic?
583.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
I stand corrected
584.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
So this is like a signature? Under every comment? Why, if we all have usernames?
585.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
What does -dro mean?
586.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
You can't have a private Github fork
587.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
It would seem that Github's TOS is superior to their license. They could have chosen other way to host their code
588.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
They claim so much and their browsers' code is 100% proprietary so it's impossiblen to verify their lies. This is what triggered the bullshit detector in my head
589.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
I don't understand what you do not get. In the link you sent they claim to be a privacy oriented web browser based on chromium
590.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
Because it's open source
591.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
I meant underscores, just noticed
592.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
There's so much wrong with this reply I won't even bother trying to respond, I feel the negativity of this comment pour through my screen
593.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
I'm talking about the HN markup, italics don't work here, only asterisks do
594.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
Most of HN users
595.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
It doesn't look nice at all to me. Real emphasis looks way nicer, that's its purpose. Now that we have rich text, why not utilize it?
596.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
Why?
597.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
I don't see the point of pointing out the MTF stuff then
598.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
I read 2 articles on RationalWiki, both of which were extremely biased, clearly taking sides
599.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
Fyi, we use asterisks (*) for emphasis on HN
600.
▲
by
efilife
2y ago
So still a woman? And her pronouns are she/her, not they/them.
More ›