Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
efilife
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
271.
▲
by
efilife
9mo ago
This is terrible for someone who doesn't know anything and wants to make a website (the people this article is directed to) > Don’t shop around for a CMS. Don’t even design or outline your website. Don’t buy a domain or hosting yet.
272.
▲
by
efilife
9mo ago
you should disclose that it's your portfolio
273.
▲
by
efilife
9mo ago
This was the first thing I noticed too. This is the most low effort post I have ever seen that high up on hacker news
274.
▲
by
efilife
9mo ago
psa: The title has been changed since
275.
▲
by
efilife
9mo ago
It's been like this for a long time so it must be working. My guess is that fewer choices = easier to choose a video.
276.
▲
by
efilife
9mo ago
Ransomware too?
277.
▲
by
efilife
9mo ago
Isn't it about compression artifacts?
278.
▲
by
efilife
9mo ago
how many times will I get clickbaited by some cool title only to see AI praise in the article and nothing more? It's tiring and happens way too often related "webdev is fun again": claude. https://ma.ttias.be/
279.
▲
by
efilife
10mo ago
No! Maybe I wasn't entirely clear in what I wanted to say. The point is ChatGPT gets various info about you and it won't disclose to you that it has them. There's the memory feature, but various reports (and my own experience
280.
▲
by
efilife
10mo ago
> Now we hooked all that up to agents. I and many others are not in your we
281.
▲
by
efilife
10mo ago
or had this info injected into its system prompt and was doing everything not to reval it. ChatGPT gets fed your IP address* and approximate location in its system prompt but won't ever admit it and will come up with excuses. Just ask
282.
▲
by
efilife
10mo ago
I love tailwind. AI chatbots are useless. Old internet was bad. Asians are proven to have the highest IQ. There's no logical reason for humans to exist. DOOM was a bad game.
283.
▲
by
efilife
10mo ago
what do you mean?
284.
▲
by
efilife
10mo ago
Doesn't seem like it
285.
▲
by
efilife
10mo ago
Was it really 5 min or more like 30?
286.
▲
by
efilife
10mo ago
mine seems too dumb to be able to find it
287.
▲
by
efilife
10mo ago
Same here. I wrote this comment before I saw yours: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46496990 It really brings no value. I'm not learning anything new here. And the discussion around it is always the same thing.
288.
▲
by
efilife
10mo ago
> but also the best way to get your box popped what do you mean? why?
289.
▲
by
efilife
10mo ago
I'm starting to resent the feeling of reading a cool article and for the conclusion to always be AI.
290.
▲
by
efilife
10mo ago
How did you guys find the site?
291.
▲
by
efilife
10mo ago
> Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something. This seems to kinda fit but not entirely?
292.
▲
by
efilife
10mo ago
Am I crazy? Why do I feel like all the text on the page was written by a LLM? I started seeing this everywhere
293.
▲
by
efilife
10mo ago
not again
294.
▲
by
efilife
10mo ago
Please read the article before commenting. It's not about what you think it is
295.
▲
by
efilife
10mo ago
Same. This blog post is actually good news
296.
▲
by
efilife
10mo ago
If it's loose then you might want to screw it on. Sorry, couldn't resist! The correct word here is lose, when something is loose it means that it's not fastened or constrained, like a loose knot
297.
▲
by
efilife
10mo ago
> I'm very impressed that anyone who speaks another language natively can get good at it. From my completely anecdotal observations, native speakers are the worst at English. They struggle with homophones, prepositions, tenses, conf
298.
▲
by
efilife
10mo ago
This is terrible. So disrespectful. It's baffling how someone can do this under their own name
299.
▲
by
efilife
10mo ago
I also don't read AI slop. It's disrespectful to any reader.
300.
▲
by
efilife
10mo ago
this shit is ChatGPT-written and I'm really tired of it. If I wanted to read chatgpt I would have asked it myself. Half of the article are nonsensical repeated buzzwords thrown in for absolutely no reason
More ›