Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
eelco
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
91.
▲
Haskell on the iPhone
(haskell.org)
1 points
by
eelco
17y ago
|
0 comments
92.
▲
by
eelco
17y ago
That's funny, I listen to music because I don't like background noise. (In fact, listening to music you're familiar with can help you focus since it shuts out other, irregular, distracting sounds.)
93.
▲
by
eelco
17y ago
While this is a very cool hack, compiling to C is (relatively) easy. Objective-C, but mostly the (Cocoa Touch) API's are the interesting bit of iPhone development. Until there is a good way to use those API's in a high(er) level language,
94.
▲
by
eelco
17y ago
On whose network?
95.
▲
by
eelco
17y ago
There's a Dutch start-up doing much of the same. They have challenges from companies and pay students that win. It's very 'local' and a not a really nice website, but they've been fairly successful in setting up the platform so far. It's
96.
▲
by
eelco
17y ago
Yes, but consider the Prevalent Hypothesis ( http://prevayler.org/wiki/Prevalent%20Hypothesis ): "That all your business data fits in the RAM you can afford" I believe this is true in many, not say most, cases. If not, don't use an in-memo
97.
▲
by
eelco
17y ago
Note that this partly specific for US law, not all countries require registration for copyrighted material.
98.
▲
by
eelco
17y ago
As these things go, it's probably more complex than that. Still, I'm also very interested in why this won't work for Twitter's (current) architecture.
99.
▲
by
eelco
17y ago
Actually, that's the law: if you're employed as a programmer, any programming you do in your free time is copyrighted by your employer. At least in the Netherlands. (More info at http://www.iusmentis.com/copyright/crashcourse/ownership/
100.
▲
by
eelco
17y ago
Heh, nice idea, the eavesdropping is funny: http://www.tjetter.com/#3jsK
101.
▲
by
eelco
18y ago
I don't think you can build a community by just writing libraries, frameworks, etc. ;) The crucial (and hard) part is getting people from the outside involved, so that you _don't_ have to write everything yourself, but it will turn into a
102.
▲
by
eelco
18y ago
He's forgetting one important thing. Compared to other functional languages Clean has virtually no community. That said, the things they (the language developers) can build are pretty impressive. Their iTasks workflow system (unfortunate
103.
▲
by
eelco
18y ago
That's hilarious, you can buy like 20 different designs of stickers that are almost transparent to human eyes? I'm sure the Ottawanian boy can still have a piece of the market for these things. At least until every dangerous window has a d
104.
▲
The [Haskell] IO Monad for People who Simply Don't Care (old, but cool)
(sigfpe.blogspot.com)
1 points
by
eelco
18y ago
|
0 comments
105.
▲
by
eelco
18y ago
It's (just) one of the usages of monads, but it's not what monads 'are'.
106.
▲
by
eelco
18y ago
Hiding complexity is not the same as reducing it.
107.
▲
by
eelco
18y ago
Indeed. In fact, we had almost exactly the same idea when brainstorming about cool iPhone apps with a couple of people, but thought it was too lame and that we couldn't pull it off in a high-quality way ;) Ideas don't matter, people (with t
108.
▲
by
eelco
18y ago
I'll give the same reply as was given in the comment thread of the article, which you apparently didn't read. http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/pkg-list.html
109.
▲
by
eelco
18y ago
Maybe I'm getting Haskell-blind, but what's "wierd" about the syntax? If I think about "wierd" syntax, I think about Erlang or Objective-C or Befunge for that matter. However, it seems that once you spent a day or so with a language the sy
110.
▲
by
eelco
18y ago
Well, I'll be glad as hell if Haskell is as popular in 4.5 years from now as Python is currently (pg's article about the Python Paradox was written August 2004). Hmm, I think I'll even be glad if Haskell will ever be as popular as Python w
111.
▲
by
eelco
18y ago
I should definitely try out AWS. It's a bit of work, but the docs are good and I think it's a useful experience to at least know a bit about how it actually works. Since you pay for AWS by the hour (and bandwidth), you can more easily swit
112.
▲
by
eelco
18y ago
No, _people_ are putting people's passwords at risk ;) That said, I completely agree. Especially sad since Blaine Cook was involved with creating the first Ruby implementation of the protocol, more than a year ago.
113.
▲
by
eelco
18y ago
Now would be a great time to learn the joy of mouse gestures, configure your middle click button or install a greasemonkey/userscript.
114.
▲
by
eelco
18y ago
Implying that people who gross $20K with their iPhone application are probably not happy sounds quite bitter. You could give it a more positive spin by changing the 'probably's to 'if's or 'might's.
115.
▲
by
eelco
18y ago
At least they're still working on it ;) http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/MacBuildInstructions
116.
▲
by
eelco
18y ago
Uh. In other news, no wait, in the same news (the site the article is based on, link at the bottom), Linux' market share almost _doubled_ in 9 months. How's that for growth ;)
117.
▲
by
eelco
18y ago
Nice example of a developer team completely ignoring management and corporate guidelines. Too bad it took them so long ;)
118.
▲
by
eelco
18y ago
Since I don't have any experience with doing system code in Perl, a small example would be nice.
119.
▲
by
eelco
18y ago
The main problem is that both SQL and HTML are often simply represented by strings. The programmer has to keep track herself to make sure everything is escaped and unescaped at the right moment. The point is that you can use Haskell's type
120.
▲
by
eelco
18y ago
I don't think that's necessarily true. Take a look at all the System.Posix modules: http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/unix/Syste...
More ›