echlebek

53 ms·

451.
by echlebek 11y ago
Canadian here. You just multiply by 1.6.
452.
by echlebek 11y ago
The behaviour you are talking about isn't anything to do with :=. It's just how scoping works in Go. := is just syntactic sugar. http://play.golang.org/p/bh6pm_8s9S
453.
by echlebek 11y ago
Hi, I used to take adderal for ADD when I was in my early 20s. 40 mg/day is a LOT... who put you on that dose? I was taking 10-20 mg/day and it usually left me feeling totally zonked. (I'm about 200 lbs) Taking 40 mg was a su
454.
by echlebek 11y ago
I think the title is a little misleading, note that the article title says "seemingly". I think a more likely explanation for the virus' behaviour is that removing other malwares or improving its host's security really j
455.
by echlebek 11y ago
There's plenty of women that study math and physics. I know this because they were in my classes in CS, math and physics, and beside me on graduation day. Your assumption that women don't like these topics is wrong. I'd encou
456.
by echlebek 11y ago
You're not free to kick someone that calls you a retard. That is assault, which is a crime in most places on earth. I thought every adult would know that, but here we are. Sticks and stones.
457.
by echlebek 11y ago
Depends on what you consider obfuscation. Consider the following python code: a.b = c In isolation, there is really no way to tell what that line of code will do. Maybe it will simply assign c to a.b. But because Python has property
458.
by echlebek 11y ago
I think it's reasonable to ask: "who is this bugging?" When I was learning Go it took me about 5 minutes to understand how slices work, and I've never had a problem with this behaviour in my work (or my coworkers' w