Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ecesena
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
59 ms
·
661.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
If you say "is hiring me" I assume you've not started yet. Given that launching a startup is no joke, if I were you I'd start working on the tool for them, paid in full, keeping your idea to turn it into a startup in bac
662.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
+1 - Looking forward for Cryptography II
663.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
How about starting with AWS SageMaker? The blog posts at the bottom are nice tutorials that you can go through quickly: https://aws.amazon.com/sagemaker/developer-resources/
664.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
Yes, you can have a single certificate for both a.com and b.a.com. You can also have it for a.com and <star>.a.com. No, you can't get <star>.com. Typically, at least for known root CAs, you have to prove ownership of your t
665.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
I'd be curious to know how many phishing sites support 2fa, i.e. can also phish time-based codes. If anyone from PhishLabs is reading... :) Edit: grammar
666.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
There are great comments on the technology itself, including SQS/PubSub/RabbitMQ, or Celery. However if you need 1) management, i.e. easy way to look at what went wrong and retry 2) dependencies between jobs, you should look into
667.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
Solo, an open source security key: https://github.com/soloKeysSec/solo/ In terms of dev/sw, the most exciting things are 1) adding support for openpgp/ssh in addition to FIDO, 2) rewriting the firmware i
668.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
If anyone is interested in code, this is an implementation in Java made by a friend: https://github.com/comodal/secret-shamiracle
669.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
The hostname of the website you're visiting is cryptographically signed by the security key. So, if by accident you're on phishing.com, the key will generate a signature containing phishing.com. When the attacker forwards it to go
670.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
My personal opinion: it's enough and you should recommend it on Google & Facebook, particularly to protect against phishing, and especially to non-tech people. Security keys are supported on Google and Facebook on (almost) all brow
671.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
Note that this is only for a login from a new device. If you have your phone, you can change the settings easily. Same if you have a browser already logged in.
672.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
U2F also works over usb on Android. Not sure it's very usable, but it works.
673.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
Currently works on Chrome, Firefox, Edge. Safari is under development: https://webkit.org/status/#feature-web-authentication
674.
▲
The Next Era of Bug Bounty at Pinterest
(medium.com)
2 points
by
ecesena
8y ago
|
0 comments
675.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
Would it be possible to know, ballpark, how much a similar security assessment can cost? I understand it's hard to say in general, but given this output I assume it's possible to "get a quote". In an ideal world, all sec
676.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
Lately I read this interesting article on STM flash protection, incredibly clear, but also rich of low level details: https://www.usenix.org/conference/woot17/workshop-program/pr...
677.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
I’d also highly recommend to share a link to your code now. You’re top on hn/ask, you’ll get quite some folks looking at it and maybe someone is interested in helping you out.
678.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
You should check out bombsheller, custom 3d printed leggings, very high quality. (I’m not affiliated but I know the people running it.) http://bombsheller.com
679.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
Can anyone confirm if the server certificate in the server hello message is encrypted or not? I've heard many time it's encrypted, but I can't find it explicitly written in the RFC. And it seems unencrypted in this example.
680.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
Pinterest | Security | San Francisco, CA or Seattle, WA | Full-Time | Onsite I'm looking specifically for Product Security, but my team is also hiring for Infra & Corp Security. Feel free to reach out directly, I'll need your
681.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
Thanks for the pointer.
682.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
> BPF is a highly flexible, efficient code execution engine in the Linux kernel that allows bytecode to run at various hook points, enabling safe and easy modifications of kernel behaviors with custom code. Can someone explain the
683.
▲
Attacking Google Authenticator
(unix-ninja.com)
1 points
by
ecesena
8y ago
|
0 comments
684.
▲
Launching a Technical Kickstarter – Solo: Open Source Security Key
(hackernoon.com)
1 points
by
ecesena
8y ago
|
0 comments
685.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
Thank you! Yes, the color is exactly an attempt to attract other people. And yes, your comment is exactly my point :) > why someone concerned about security should bother about color First: why do we have colored phones then? Why someone
686.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
Thank you for this, I'm one of the creators of Solo. BTW, to add to your point, a couple interesting numbers. 1) Search "login" on Kickstarter [1]. All 22 campaigns from 2011 to 2018 have failed! 2) Search "security"
687.
▲
Open Source Security Key – Launching a Technical Kickstarter
(hackernoon.com)
2 points
by
ecesena
8y ago
|
0 comments
688.
▲
Open Source Security Key – Launching a Technical Kickstarter
(hackernoon.com)
2 points
by
ecesena
8y ago
|
0 comments
689.
▲
by
ecesena
8y ago
Open source code: https://github.com/SoloKeysSec/solo Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18131651
690.
▲
Solo: open source security key – last week on Kickstarter
(solokeys.com)
2 points
by
ecesena
8y ago
|
1 comments
More ›