ecb_penguin

11 ms·

151.
by ecb_penguin 1y ago
> Citation needed That's not how things work.... It's also a weird way to have a conversation or discussion. I can't prove a negative that millions of people didn't do something. > At some point at some position yo
152.
by ecb_penguin 1y ago
> But that's the point - he wasn't doing anything that other CEOs weren't doing too 1. Millions of business executives go their entire life without insider trading 2. Lots of people commit crimes and are not caught. It doe
153.
by ecb_penguin 1y ago
> there is a reasonable chance it will lead to the curing of all diseases This is complete nonsense. AI might help with the _identification_ of diseases, but there is nothing to support the idea that every human ailment is curable. Perha
154.
by ecb_penguin 1y ago
> but it does actually seem like a pretty reasonable claim that without databases progress will be a snails pace and with databases it will be more of a horses trot. This isn't what anyone is saying
155.
by ecb_penguin 1y ago
> That's a little alarmist. It's not going to happen. Serious question, when someone tells you what they want, why don't want you believe them? It's openly being discussed and you think it's alarmist? No, we need
156.
by ecb_penguin 1y ago
> Describing C as "high-level" seems like deliberate abuse of the term Honestly it doesn't really matter. High level and low level are relative to each-other (and machine language), and nothing changes based on what label
157.
by ecb_penguin 2y ago
> Are you legally required to carry a means of communication? If not, how can this possibly be enforced? Obviously not... If you have no means to communicate you are not required to communicate. I don't know why you'd think oth
158.
by ecb_penguin 2y ago
If police had a legal obligation to protect people from crime, everyone would have recourse if the police failed to protect them. Bar fight? Sue the police. Domestic violence? Sue the police. It would literally lead to the collapse of the j