ealhad

19 ms·

181.
by ealhad 9y ago
Happy Colemak user here. I have been using Colemak for two years, and Emacs for a little more than one year. However I use Spacemacs with Vim keybindings :D
182.
by ealhad 9y ago
Which framework? It have not yet done any GUI with Rust, but would gladly try.
183.
by ealhad 9y ago
Definitely https://devdocs.io
184.
by ealhad 9y ago
I can only agree with you. I don't like some of the syntactic choices of Clojure, and sadly some of those are in Hy.
185.
by ealhad 9y ago
“Keep in mind we’re not Clojure. We’re not Common Lisp. We’re Homoiconic Python, with extra bits that make sense.” — Hy Style Guide That said, Hy takes a lot from Clojure.
186.
by ealhad 9y ago
The thing is, back in the 80s (before I was even born!), the cost was huge, but it has stayed the same until now. So, yeah, it cannot best good C/C++, or even optimized Java, but it still outperforms any scripting language. You know wh
187.
by ealhad 9y ago
Oh, I never heard of this one before. Thanks a bunch, it looks quite nice! ...although I code much more in Haskell nowadays, I might get hooked on macros again.
188.
by ealhad 9y ago
It must not be forgotten that performance isn't always the main concern, let alone the only one. And yeah, the expressiveness/speed ratio of Lisp is great .
189.
by ealhad 9y ago
Yes, I completely see your point. The main project I worked on to learn Common Lisp was the back-end of a web application ; I even had to compress data myself.
190.
by ealhad 9y ago
What do you think of Python, then?
191.
by ealhad 9y ago
> Huh, What kind of unused code and data is there in a 25MB hello world? If you want to produce a standalone Lisp executable, you have to embed the compiler with it, hence the big size. However, if you just run the programs with your own
192.
by ealhad 9y ago
My thoughts exactly, although expressed in a much more organized way. I love Lisp. I had a great time learning it, but its lack of momentum is a big problem.
193.
by ealhad 9y ago
Well, DirectX fostered multiple generations of gaming on Windows.
194.
by ealhad 9y ago
I don't think Haskell code looks like this. You don't have to use all the guru syntactic sugar; the library functions usually have pretty explicit names, and yours should have to.
195.
by ealhad 9y ago
> All-in-all, the fact that he mentions he exploited security hole in his company and then calls it "SQL thing" screams at me: FAKE Why? That doesn't surprise me at all. As a (Computer Science) student, there were a lot of
196.
by ealhad 9y ago
You should definitely try, even if you end up being somewhat unsatisfied every time you have to use something else. When I write code in Haskell, it feels right, just like when I discovered Lisp. Only better. And oh, the purity! Not only in