Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ealexhudson
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
91.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
Exactly. Any form of "agree and accept that /X/ does not relate to the employment" sort of thing. But you have to be very specific about what is carved out.
92.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
The plain reading meaning of "in the course of" is not the case law, though, it has established precedent - and most of that favoured the employers in question. I don't know of a case that took into account "personal tim
93.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
Copyright is automatically the employer's in the UK: the term is "in the course of employment", and no contractual language is required. The employer is effectively the author. What that term means is a matter of case law, an
94.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
It just means you need a liquidity event. Many investors don't want to cash out early stage employees, many PE will only want to buy the whole thing. If the business can't take out a loan or similar, and those staying can't a
95.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
I got a new HSBC credit card just the other day - still Visa. If they're planning to change, they're taking their sweet time about it...
96.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
I wish they did "User Files" instead of "Users" too, because so much software breaks on the home area having a space in it. Not least, it makes writing scripts for various shells and getting the quoting rules right an ab
97.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
But he wasn't just CEO; he was founder and probably still a significant stock holder. While all the shareholders bear some culpability, either: a. having enough capital in the business to pay severance, or, b. firing people at the poin
98.
▲
It's tough being an Azure fan
(alexhudson.com)
357 points
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
|
269 comments
99.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
Azure claim a bunch of standards, inc the various ISO, SOC, etc as well as claiming HIPAA et al. Now, I haven't checked this service is in scope, but I would presume it is. Given such an obvious piece of external evidence that the IMS
100.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
A BIOS is just code at the cold-boot memory location, there's no obvious reason to believe that isn't a simple extension to this project. Equally, the TRAP mechanism for I/O to terminal is not vastly different to the INT 21h
101.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
Yeah, but they state it in quite non-obvious terms: "you might hit the rate limit", or "you could be flagged as spam if you send to multiple recipients". The real risk is that someone finds this script on your website, o
102.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
The homepage claim is that no server-side code is required to integrate it - so this seems to allow anyone to rock up on your website, call into the EmailJS service, and trigger an email? Given that EmailJS doesn't send email directly
103.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
>>> [3, 4] * ureg.meter + [4, 3] * ureg.cm <Quantity([ 3.04 4.03], 'meter')> This numpy example was confusing to me because of the digit reuse; it looked to me like the second quantity should have been in
104.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
The storage is at the high end and better than most other EV chemistries by 50%+. It's unusable because it doesn't survive long enough, but I think the point is if they can solve the cycle issue then this chemistry becomes availab
105.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
"The vast majority of Bitcoin’s energy consumption happens during the mining process. Once coins have been issued, the energy required to validate transactions is minimal." Honestly, that doesn't seem particularly well-inform
106.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
The PoW algorithm needs to effectively pick winners more or less at random, with a consistent number of winners (and gaps between), and the results be self-evidently correct. There are few problems which fit those criteria and are useful...
107.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
It's relatively new. The basic idea is to bridge the gap between rental and home ownership: you don't need as big a mortgage to buy a share of a property, and you can benefit (proportionately) from any capital gains from the incre
108.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
The "wheeze" you talking about is just avoiding double taxation. The business pays corporation tax on the profit it makes : while salaries are an expense, dividends are not. So you're paying 19% on revenue above the "min
109.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
Case 4 should be P(b is even)
110.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
Can you expand on that a bit? If the program "is" the specification, in what manner could the program ever deviate from the specification in a way a prover could pick up? Or are you talking about adding additional constraints to a
111.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
Are you saying it's possible to cut a rope to length 3?
112.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
They're part of the bogies and likely can be separated in a straightforward way.
113.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
I understood that point as relating more to management than technical contribution - that the support of people like Eich was imperative to keep the project funded, and as key supporters left the project became more susceptible to cancellat
114.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
OpenStreetMap seem to have missed a trick. The GB patent was thrown out for being obvious, and the report on the exam is public. They also suggested withdrawing the application due to the EU one being filed.
115.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
No, it's definitely cash and equivalents. The shareholder account is virtually £50m at this point, and they had nothing like that cash until the raises in 2017.
116.
▲
by
ealexhudson
5y ago
I thought you were kidding, but apparently not. Even worse : £320k of that revenue was from sales to Daimler AG (a shareholder) and is described as "services". I would love to understand the business model here, they've maint
117.
▲
by
ealexhudson
6y ago
I know of a few people who bought Stadia because they couldn't get their hands on PS5 or Xbox and were willing to give it a shot, particularly for Cyberpunk. By and large, they've seemed pretty happy with it. I understood that Sta
118.
▲
by
ealexhudson
6y ago
NHS won't forbid you from paying, such an order would come from the Courts. It's an exceptional case that a family would have this kind of rule imposed on them, but Courts will consider the patient's best interests before the
119.
▲
by
ealexhudson
6y ago
13485 is relatively bureaucratic, but it's not required for FDA per se and there are things you can do. What is more problematic is IEC 62304 or similar, which embeds a very particular SDLC into the development approach. It doesn'
120.
▲
by
ealexhudson
6y ago
The problem of "how does a computer identify an individual" is clearly a different problem to "how does the individual want to be identified?". Facebook Work accounts. Teachers running Google Classroom. There are plenty
More ›