Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
e3bc54b2
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
151.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
OTOH if you already have another checksumming mechanism in place (oh hello there, git!) age can piggyback off that and ensure there's no switcharoo.
152.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
I am loving the latest Emacs Renaissance! All you can eat buffet, but you can take your lunch (and dinner) home :) OTOH, org-mode already does this, without any need for external package and minimal config. It works really well, too!
153.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
As always, the answer with Open source is do it yourself, or sponsor someone else who can :) Besides, for the privacy benefits it provides, its definitely good enough. You can also export data and have fancy graphs be shown with minimal eff
154.
▲
Phoenix LiveView 0.18 Released
(phoenixframework.org)
10 points
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
|
0 comments
155.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
As a fellow doom user, Emacs became lot more stable (and faster) after disabling bunch of default doom packages and modules. In its default config, doom really is intended for use on semi-modern processors with SSDs.That fancy modeline et a
156.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
When I first watched that movie I never thought it would be so on the point, just 15 years too early..
157.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
NixOS has a nice module that can be easily enabled. After that default DE durden can be invoked with single command and can be interacted with as a normal VM/Window alongside your existing DE. Admittedly I haven't tries making it
158.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
How about Arcan? [0] It seems very well reasoned, has stable API, excellent backwards compatibility and does not require GPU and i5 as this one might? Its author also has proven record and actual experience, which I'm not sure authors
159.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
I get resistance to C, it is quite simple and straightforward language, but pointers aren't for beginners. But hey, scheme is nice. No manual memory management, as simple as it comes syntax, very little to get started, excellent REPL,
160.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
> I think (because I have no experience) twins must have a deeper human connection For all its worth, I know at least 2 pairs of twins who cannot stand each other.
161.
▲
Tvix status update: A Nix reimplementation in Rust
(tvl.fyi)
5 points
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
|
0 comments
162.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
Good god this is a great article! Starting from TLDR at top, it is well reasoned, well sourced and very detailed. And I agree, UPI should remain free, precisely to allow the vibrant ecosystem and innovation formed around it. Banks nowhere a
163.
▲
Emacs 28.2
(lists.gnu.org)
83 points
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
|
24 comments
164.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
Oh Python is definitely bad enough that people would want to give it up. Its just that everything else is even worse for this use case , so nobody does.
165.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
That was fun read, thanks! For future reference: https://www.gnus.org/stuff/pterodactyl/pterodactyl.html
166.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
Yep, that was Lars' doing as well. He ran like 1 years worth of Emacs builds on every commit to see where the big jumps occurred, dug down and fixed regressions. There were other people helping too, but I remember Lars being the drivin
167.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
Been reading Lars' bug hunt logs since it started and its amazing. Guy retired rich and instead of lazying around or doing vain publicity/philanthropy he chose to develop and maintain Emacs, all out in the open. Almost all the bug
168.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
Perhaps you can write some articles using them, showing how they're better?
169.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
SBCL is de-facto most popular implementation of Common Lisp, if I dare say. It is free, it is well maintained, it is easily available, and it is fast. As a student/enthusiast, it doesn't get much better. Lispworks/Allegro is
170.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
> I'm wondering why a family of languages should be this dependent on a specific editor... As mentioned by others, its not. But Emacs is also a Lisp runtime. People who are attracted to Emacs eventually learn some Lisp (Emacs Lisp,
171.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
Thank you for detailed reply here and elsewhere in the thread. That probably took as much time as writing a new blog post, so it is really appreciated. As mentioned before, as a newbie student of Elixir this is all very exciting. Please kee
172.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
I tried Joplin, and most other PKM/note-taking tools out there. Eventually settled on org-mode. Encryption can be sync-time using restic/cryptomator (cloud sync), filesystem (self-hosted all the way), or save time using plain old
173.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
I'd love to use Logseq, but in my experience the mobile app is quite buggy. Otherwise it works surprisingly well with my existing org-mode notes, if not 100% compatible.
174.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
Thank you! That makes quite a few things clear. As a naïve question, how does SBCL (Common Lisp compiler) generate such a wicked fast code? Other than actor model, it is also dynamically typed and hot code loading is one of the headline fea
175.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
I'd love to watch it, but the recordings are not available yet and 250$ virtual.attendance was way too much for personal interest language.
176.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
Indeed all the DockYard pieces announced are nice, but the posts are puff pieces at best. From what I understood, Elixir/OTP are there, but instead of compiling to BEAM bytecode, they compile for WASI (targeting whatever can run WebAss
177.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
Heh. You know who made their fortune providing "everything else handled by default"? Microsoft. Now that enters a fairly divisive terrain, but needless to say, what you expect from single source of tooling generally does not end u
178.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
I've not been part of lot of conferences, but both Emacs conf and Nix conf put videos up pretty much as soon as they're presented. But if the conference is independent and the aim is to make money, I get it. Conferences with aim t
179.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
Tangential, but where can I watch the talks from ElixirConf 2022? Youtube channel has not uploaded any yet, and the website doesn't seem to have any recordings either. All I see is 250$ to attend virtually. Shouldn't their target
180.
▲
by
e3bc54b2
4y ago
> Plenty of people have great motives, few have the means to execute on them. Sure. Not plenty, but still a lot of people have the means, and few of them choose to execute. Larse Ingebrigsten was a CTO of startup that got acquired and no
More ›