Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dyeje
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
61 ms
·
661.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
I didn't try TrueVault because I didn't want to integrate it into an existing application. Certainly seems like an option worth exploring if you're into it. For HIPAA compliant hosting, I would say a sane price point is below
662.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
I recently went through setting up a HIPAA compliant web app. The team is small and has no dedicated DevOps so I went looking for a PaaS solution. After extensive researching and trialing, I went with Healthcare Blocks. They provide a great
663.
▲
Fortnite’s Epic Games Gets $1.25B from New Investor Group
(bloomberg.com)
1 points
by
dyeje
8y ago
|
0 comments
664.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
Just use a paid service. If you have to spend more than hour setting up your own mail server then you already spent more on labor than a year of Mailgun.
665.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
If your goal is to use new technologies, sure. Personally, I would probably never take a new job with a paycut. Also, are you aware that the COBOL market is so hot right now that companies are paying alot of money to bring devs out of retir
666.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
Looking over it, I think you may be chasing the wrong market. The only companies I know selling on prem software are large enterprises to other enterprises. It's fine to have a self serve product, but the people who are going to actual
667.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
StockX is a Dan Gilbert company so if QL goes down, they probably do too.
668.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
QL definitely has a huge focus on automation right now.
669.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
If you have the skills to get hired you should be fine. That said, if you do end up pursuing more education then you'd probably be better off getting a MS. The programs are shorter, there are many that will work with a 9-5 schedule, an
670.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
Yes, absolutely. It's a very mature and productive framework with a vibrant community built up around it. It integrates with webpack so you can have whatever frontend you like. There's plenty of work. Performance and scalability a
671.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
It really depends on the application. If you're making something that has a highly interactive UI, then React is a great tool for that. It doesn't have to be all or nothing though, you can use Rails server side rendering with Reac
672.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
Why not just explain it in plain English right on the page? Expecting potential users to read a wiki article just to understand what your product is seems like unnecessary friction.
673.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
Remote team or not, their product is super slow.
674.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
Use Django. Check out the major frontend frameworks (React, Vue, or Angular) and pick the one that looks good to you. From there, you should be able to find tutorials on how to hook up that framework with Django.
675.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
Why don't you think removing genders will make the language easier? I studied German in college and memorizing these was my only complaint.
676.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
This. Require auth, it also allows you to add stuff like rate limiting per account to further prevent abuse.
677.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
That's not saying much. Rally is probably the most overpriced, awful tracking software out there. I prefer Pivotal Tracker personally.
678.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
I used the free trial when it first came out, it's pretty slick.
679.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
Just because it's a global site doesn't mean the traffic is distributed uniformly across the day. Certain regions are going to have higher traffic during business hours. I'd guess their off hours are somewhere around 6pm PST
680.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
This was a huge deal at the time, here's one of the HN threads. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3663197
681.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
Wow they've been running 3.2 for this long? That's wild considering the talk Eileen gave at RailsConf this year made it sound like alot of the Rails 6 scalability stuff was based on GitHub's existing work.
682.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
The renter also isn't assuming responsibility for keeping the property in repair. The owner assumes all the risk.
683.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
Like most things, the best approach lies somewhere in the middle. I’ve had a lot of success with using component driven CSS (BEM, SMACSS, etc style) in combination with utility classes. The components keep everything consistent and make bui
684.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
I don't like the new design either but this made it bearable.
685.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
The sample size for levels.fyi is small and in Jeff Atwood's reply to patio11 only 7% of responders said they make over 400k+. I don't doubt that there are people out there (or even you) making that much, I just don't believe
686.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
First of all, I didn't read your previous comment and you are not the parent post of the comment I replied to. I am sorry you are 'disturbed' by my skepticism of random people on the internet, but I don't have friends wo
687.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
I wouldn't believe everything you read on the internet. I often see absurb compensation packages posted on HN and have never seen anything close to them in real life.
688.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
I highly recommend signing up for Nielsen Norman Group's weekly newsletter. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/subscribe/
689.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
No, it's overkill. Focus on the product, not the infrastructure. You can switch later if / when it becomes necessary.
690.
▲
by
dyeje
8y ago
I am surprised that their suggested solution was for a many-to-many relationship. Seems like you would want to stay one-to-many but remove the unique validations. If you're sharing address records then it seems there could be many poss
More ›