Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dwwoelfel
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
52 ms
·
451.
▲
The Nature of Temptation: Why those who speak against vice so often fall for it.
(boston.com)
6 points
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
|
1 comments
452.
▲
GTD for Academics
(gtdtimes.com)
1 points
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
|
0 comments
453.
▲
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
According to a Google Tech Talk by the creator, a few people have switched from vi to emacs to get org-mode. The obvious implication is that there is nothing comparable for vi. However, the talk was in July of 2008, so maybe someone has cre
454.
▲
"The first commercial 3D bio-printer for manufacturing human tissue and organs."
(economist.com)
6 points
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
|
0 comments
455.
▲
Why do the machines need humans?
(johnaugust.com)
1 points
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
|
0 comments
456.
▲
Lay Off the Layoffs, They Often Backfire
(newsweek.com)
1 points
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
|
0 comments
457.
▲
Volition in Animals
(dianahsieh.com)
1 points
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
|
0 comments
458.
▲
All Presidents Are Above Average
(slate.com)
9 points
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
|
2 comments
459.
▲
The Complete Sherlock Holmes Cannon
(ignisart.com)
1 points
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
|
0 comments
460.
▲
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
I'm sorry I offended you. I should have said that I don't want to get into an argument with an anti-abortionist about abortion.
461.
▲
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
It's making fun of them because she's doing it in the context of a comedian on a stage telling jokes.
462.
▲
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
Thanks for replying. I completely disagree with the premises behind your statement that "people who don't kill their own children merely because they have some issues are relatively virtuous." But I know better than to argue with anti-abort
463.
▲
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
I think that she was making fun of both people like Sarah Palin and retarded people. See this quote: "The only problem with adopting a retarded child is that the retarded child, when you are 80 is well, still retarded"
464.
▲
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
To anyone who down-voted, I'm curious to know why. There have been at least 5 down-votes, but no replies.
465.
▲
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
Making fun of mentally retarded people isn't funny. They are victims of circumstance, and its sad that they'll never be productive, self-supporting individuals. Making fun of people like Sarah Palin, who believe that they are virtuous becau
466.
▲
Conversation Hackers: How Trolls Work
(cognitionandculture.net)
24 points
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
|
13 comments
467.
▲
Manifold Destiny: A legendary problem and the battle over who solved it.
(newyorker.com)
7 points
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
|
0 comments
468.
▲
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
The two authors have completely different views about the purpose and nature of history. Justin Cunningham, the author who doesn't think that memorizing historical facts is important, has the view that history is just a collection of discon
469.
▲
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
Scott Powell, the guy who wrote this article, recorded a set of lectures covering the history of Western Civilization. They're available for purchase on his website here: http://www.powellhistory.com/1hfa.html . I'm too poor to purchase th
470.
▲
The Importance of Memorizing History
(secular-homeschooling.com)
7 points
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
|
1 comments
471.
▲
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
I think that you've missed the point. Knowing that the Pilgrims landed in America in 1620 is very important! You have to memorize dates in order to place events in their proper context. I suggest you reread the article and then read his mor
472.
▲
Why Most People Think Memorizing Historical Facts is Useless (and Why It Isn’t)
(historyatourhouse.com)
58 points
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
|
21 comments
473.
▲
Common Errors in College Math
(math.vanderbilt.edu)
45 points
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
|
9 comments
474.
▲
Nick's Mathematical Puzzles
(qbyte.org)
1 points
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
|
0 comments
475.
▲
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
The people this new regulation seeks to help are the ones that count calories, but can't multiply serving size by calories per serving. People that count calories aren't lazy in this context, so we're left with the subset of people who are
476.
▲
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
Who are these people that can't do the simple math required to convert from serving size to the amount they consume? If they are too stupid to know that (3 servings per can) X (130 calories per serving) = 390 calories per can, then they are
477.
▲
Supreme Court Reverses Limits on Campaign Spending
(online.wsj.com)
1 points
by
dwwoelfel
17y ago
|
0 comments