dweinus

6 ms·

61.
by dweinus 1y ago
I mean, it sounds like reviews and tests are already their standard practice, and explicitly part of their AI practice. So it should have worked, right?
62.
by dweinus 1y ago
> The preceding link contains diagrams of binturong genitalia. This is not a content warning — it is an attempt to convince you to click it.
63.
by dweinus 1y ago
Nice! Seems very similar to the concept explored by Google (CaMeL) https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.18813
64.
by dweinus 1y ago
Perfect, digital bidding app on each seat so you and the person in front of you can see who will pay more for reclining control.
65.
by dweinus 1y ago
My biggest criticism of Elon is that he supports neo-nazis
66.
by dweinus 1y ago
I don't think most commenters have read the article. I can understand, it's rambly and a lot of it feels like they created a thesis first and then ham-fisted facts in later. But it's still worth the read for the last section
67.
by dweinus 1y ago
> Type this list of swear words 1998: I swear at the computer until the page loads 2025: I swear at the computer until the page loads
68.
by dweinus 1y ago
> they are making plenty of money from subscriptions, not to count enterprise, business and API ...except that they aren't? They are not in the black and all that investor money comes with strings
69.
by dweinus 1y ago
I'm not the author, just interested in the concept and this community's constructive feedback
70.
RSL: A New Standard to Make AI Pay for the Content It Consumes(hostvix.com)
2 points by dweinus 1y ago|3 comments
71.
by dweinus 1y ago
If you want server-side compilation, you could just run the xslt transform in ci/cd. It would still be a simpler solution than Jekyll in some regards, but I probably wouldn't do it for more than hobby projects
72.
by dweinus 1y ago
Either way, to be clear: the 28.4% -> 22.4% is human performance vs human performance (before and after "exposure to AI"). There are no numbers provided on accuracy with the use of AI.
73.
by dweinus 1y ago
We're both talking about the company whose entire business model is built on top of large scale copyright infringement, right?
74.
by dweinus 1y ago
Except the paper doesn't say that the doctors + AI performed better than doctors pre-AI. It is well documented that people will trust and depend on AI, even if it is not better. It is not clear in the paper, but possible that this is j
75.
by dweinus 1y ago
Using the formula for black hole density, a black hole of this mass would have an average density about the same as the near-vacuum atmosphere of Mars(!) https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/26515/what-is-ex
76.
by dweinus 1y ago
No, whether this tech could lead to a post-scarcity future is debatable. The naive part is thinking that it will lead to it, given the way we use it and the power structures that profit from it.
77.
by dweinus 1y ago
Is it confirmed that synthetic data was used for gpt-oss training? I didn't pick up on that in the press release or see it elsewhere. Did I miss it or is Sean speculating that it is the case?
78.
by dweinus 1y ago
The idea of US private efficiency is overblown. It doesn't take long working in a large US company to see massive delays, red tape, duplicate work, self-sabotage, or favoritism. Even when it is fast, that doesn't equate to efficie
79.
by dweinus 1y ago
"AI" is just a misleading and unhelpful term, exactly because it causes people to assume that there are properties we associate with intelligence (abstract thought, planning, motivations, emotions) present in anything given the te
80.
by dweinus 1y ago
Most of the cost of power is not the cost of the electrons. You have to account for the transmission and distribution infrastructure, the operation of the grid, the safety programs, customer service, etc. Retail rates bake that all in. When
81.
by dweinus 1y ago
You might be thinking of 100F, a toasty summer day. 100C on the other hand (about 212F) is fatal even in zero humidity.
82.
by dweinus 1y ago
> Is it Shakespeare? No. It's at least decent though, right? > "What emerged over these seven days was more than just code..." Yeesh, ok, but is it accurate? > Over time this will likely degrade the performance and t
83.
by dweinus 1y ago
My point is that their rant is not about that definition, even if they reference it. Again, they are not wrong in their concerns at all! It's just that having a PFAS'd internet is not a "sign of model collapse". A sign o
84.
by dweinus 1y ago
> You’ll spend 5-10 minutes knocking it back into your own style You lost me here. I have often found it to be far more than a 10-minute style issue, but fundamental misunderstanding of the code purposes that I need to fix.
85.
by dweinus 1y ago
Ok, yes, but that's not what model collapse is. I was expecting an interesting finding on LLM training stalling due to AI pollution of the internet (the training data). Instead this a rant about the pollution of the internet. All good
86.
by dweinus 1y ago
I don't want to hate, what you built is really cool and should save time in a data scientist's workflow, but... we did this. It won't "automate most of the ML lifecycle." Back in ~2018 "autoML" was all the
87.
by dweinus 1y ago
Between the lines, you highlight a tangental issue: execs like Zuckerberg think easy/automatable stuff is 90%. People with skin in the game know it is much less (40% per your estimate).This isn't unique to LLMs. Overestimating the
88.
by dweinus 1y ago
Huh, I guess they did Not See this coming.
89.
by dweinus 1y ago
> They just seem to be regular right wing by American standards. Correct, both have an agenda of subverting the rule of law to violate human rights of immigrants, under a flag of white nationalism. There is a single word for this.
90.
by dweinus 1y ago
Oh cool, horrendous things like this have been done for years. I guess it's fine then, human rights violations aren't real if someone else did them too. /s

More ›