dwedge

38 ms·

721.
by dwedge 2y ago
Damn I feel old that you had to link the dotcom bubble
722.
by dwedge 2y ago
Nobody has interacted with your ad?
723.
by dwedge 2y ago
Because of deepseek right? Saying it's the end of AI because of another AI is difficult to swallow
724.
by dwedge 2y ago
If you had said the last 20 years then maybe but last 100 years? For a really good autocomplete? Just think about the innovations over the last 100 years, how the world looked in 1925
725.
by dwedge 2y ago
That's a lot of projection in a forum where you're supposed to assume the best of people you talk with. I never presented that false dichotomy.
726.
by dwedge 2y ago
You're right. I don't necessarily assume the worst from them and I don't assume the worst in general, but it's difficult to switch off from the fact that this article is marketing, and it's marketing for a company t
727.
by dwedge 2y ago
I agree with you that it's usually true, I just don't agree that it has to be true. When a company is well funded and focusing on userbase, that's great. When they need more money, it might not be. I know they are totally dif
728.
by dwedge 2y ago
> The product will get less bad for me when chasing revenue from me than how bad it will get for me when it's chasing revenue from someone who isn't me. I'd like to name this as a fallacy - begging the question. The produc
729.
by dwedge 2y ago
That's true, but the product can still get worse chasing revenue from those consumers.
730.
by dwedge 2y ago
I wish more people would self-host email. Email getting centralised to a handful of providers is no good for anyone.
731.
by dwedge 2y ago
I'm sure Ecosia are a good company, but headlines like this always make me a little suspicious. Non profits make a lot of money for their founders without it ever being "profit". Ecosia are reporting just over 600K euros a mo
732.
by dwedge 2y ago
If they put it, and it's subpar, I write off the product.
733.
by dwedge 2y ago
Benchmarks look good. I tried this with a PDF that already has accurate PDF embedded just with new lines making pdftotext fail, and it was accurate for the text it found, but missed entire pages
734.
by dwedge 2y ago
I know there are wifi and keyboard drivers, because the live boots and installers work with them, but then when it comes to installing they're gone. I know it's not insurmountable, and 10 years ago I'd have done it, but I spe
735.
by dwedge 2y ago
I'm not really moaning about the cost or lack of upgradability. I mean, I don't like it but at least you know what you're getting into. I just always assumed Linux as a backup was an option, and more and more OSX is annoying
736.
by dwedge 2y ago
Something like the brightness buttons not working, or sleep being a little erratic is ok. No released wifi drivers, bluetooth issues, and audio and the keyboard not working are not ok. Apple going backwards in terms of supporting Linux is n
737.
by dwedge 2y ago
I could have written it clearer. I have both, Intel was the first attempt and when I was struggling to get it up without losing one of wifi, audio and onboard keyboard and read that ARM was worse I gave up. Even the best combination I had (
738.
by dwedge 2y ago
Getting Linux running wasn't difficult. But Mint lost audio (everything else worked), the specialised Mint kernel lost both audio and wifi, and Arch lost both wifi and the onboard keyboard. I'm sure with tinkering I could eventual
739.
by dwedge 2y ago
Two separate laptops, I could have been clearer. I have an old 2018 I wanted to try it on, and my daily is M2 that would have been next.
740.
by dwedge 2y ago
I've been buying and using MBP for 6 or 7 years now, and just assumed I could run Linux on one if I wanted to. I just spent a couple of days trying to get a 2018 MBP working with Linux and found out [edit to clarify] that my other AR
741.
by dwedge 2y ago
Yeah I missed the extra 0s :)
742.
by dwedge 2y ago
> Spam from residential IP's should never reach SpamAssassin. If the residential IP is in the MX record for the domain, even more so if the domain passes DKIM, why not?
743.
by dwedge 2y ago
I love mox and was at your talk. I've been using it for a year. If I could make a few small feature requests (which may already exist) - I'd love to be able to use my external spamassassin with it instead of (or even in addition t
744.
by dwedge 2y ago
I'd love a backup MX that acts clustered. Email is file/object based, I should be able to spin up 5 VPS and send/receive from any one of them without ending up with an out of sync email. The closest I've found so far is
745.
by dwedge 2y ago
I agree with your point, but I don't accept the premise that people are responding quickly to emails. 99% of emails are transactional these days, and places where they aren't (eg. internal at BigCorp) it's not unusual for peo
746.
by dwedge 2y ago
I've been using it since 0.9 and it has mostly been solid. I had two bugs receiving emails, one where incoming emails didn't work from Microsoft but they fixed that in 0.13, and another incoming issue I can't remember that th
747.
by dwedge 2y ago
Of course I can't speak for everyone, but I used mox with a brand new domain on an OVH IP a year ago and it could immediately deliver to Gmail.
748.
by dwedge 2y ago
Email hosting is absolutely the lowest maintenance of everything I host. For anyone else reading this, if you follow 'mox quickstart' it will help you set up your DNS correctly so you don't have the above experience.
749.
by dwedge 2y ago
Been running a mailserver running Mox with a brand new domain on a brand new OVH IP for a year, no issues delivering to anyone.
750.
by dwedge 2y ago
Follow the mox quickstart instructions and you might be surprised how successful and maintenance free it is.

More ›