Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dwedge
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
31.
▲
by
dwedge
13d ago
> Now, she opens her bedroom door, I get “kid is awake” alert on my phone, and the machine brews the coffee. Out of all of the smart home threads and articles I've read over the years this is the only sentence that made me wish I ha
32.
▲
by
dwedge
13d ago
Projectors if they work for your home
33.
▲
by
dwedge
13d ago
They injected crypto donate buttons below, for example, tweets to make them look like twitter had a donate option. The sites were sent over https, it was mitm
34.
▲
by
dwedge
14d ago
> Person with obvious head injury and slurring speech wants to go home instead of the hospital? Sure. When I was a teenager working in a taxi office some guy came in slurring and covered in blood. I phoned him an ambulance and after 15 m
35.
▲
by
dwedge
14d ago
Considering the question was "has that every happened?" regarding the police getting a report and you having to explain the proxy to them, I guess you mean the answer is yes and your attitude is misplaced?
36.
▲
by
dwedge
14d ago
I tried doing this and the video stutter on a raspberry pi made it too annoying. Probably better off using an N100
37.
▲
by
dwedge
14d ago
It's a possibility. I don't know about CSAM but I know someone who was arrested for death threats sent to a politician after running a tor exit node. Eventually not charged, but he lost all his computing equipment for a couple of
38.
▲
by
dwedge
14d ago
Probably not. But do you really want the hassle of explaining the proxy to the police when they get a report of CSAM content uploaded from your IP?
39.
▲
by
dwedge
14d ago
Also if the domain responds on the bare IP or there's nothing else they've seen on that IP it's a fair assumption. This is without even wondering if their router sends telemetry
40.
▲
by
dwedge
14d ago
Ironic that I'd need something like that to stop getting blocked from a residential IP
41.
▲
by
dwedge
14d ago
Do they still mitm sites to put their brave crypto donation buttons on, so you think a content creator is getting the money?
42.
▲
by
dwedge
14d ago
This was a knee jerk response to the first paragraph. They weren't talking about a general crawler, but a subset of Wikipedia, stack overflow, programming docs and github. You can download archives of all of those except github, and gi
43.
▲
by
dwedge
15d ago
I have the same with the "if only there was a ..." sarcastic rebuttals. They belong 15 years ago and even then they were tiresome
44.
▲
by
dwedge
15d ago
> Pangram should be paying HNers for how often we pitch needing to use their product by name I kind of assumed it is, given how it suddenly seemed to start getting namedropped in multiple comment threads. And it's often in response
45.
▲
by
dwedge
15d ago
Interestingly I always use swapfiles and this page made me realise there can be a performance impact if the filesystem is old - the lkml link says as long as the swap file isn't fragmented there's no impact
46.
▲
by
dwedge
15d ago
I'm sure this was a very interesting article but after 7 paragraphs telling me that bread had changed in this one weird way, but not yet telling me how, it started feeling like marketing and I couldn't read more. I guess I'll
47.
▲
by
dwedge
16d ago
How do you handle updates this way? Do you mount the iso, update and keep it as an iso? Are all of the virtual machines mostly read only?
48.
▲
by
dwedge
17d ago
I'm well past the point of opening clickbait from anthropic or openai. Yeah we get it everyone else should be regulated
49.
▲
by
dwedge
17d ago
I got way too annoyed at this before realising it was an optional game and I could just close the tab
50.
▲
by
dwedge
18d ago
Sure but it's not the government calling for regulation, it's Mistral. At times they seem like a government mouthpiece to check the waters, which I could accept if their models were at least any good
51.
▲
by
dwedge
18d ago
They are regulationmaxxing instead of benchmaxxing, that's my problem with them.
52.
▲
by
dwedge
19d ago
I think it feels that way because there's much more waiting and context switching, which is tiring
53.
▲
by
dwedge
19d ago
I can't remember which decade he's talking about or verify his claims, but in Shoe Dog the creator of Nike talks about how running for exercise was viewed as very weird in the last century, and he implies that Adidas pretty much
54.
▲
by
dwedge
19d ago
I read it more as them disagreeing with at what point it's "intent" - is it bad to give yourself the option to record all customers without consent or does it only become bad once they actually turn it on (remotely) and start
55.
▲
by
dwedge
19d ago
Projectors are probably the only remaining exception here, and obviously don't work in all use cases.
56.
▲
by
dwedge
19d ago
I agree with your sentiment but unless the person you replied to edited their comment it seems misguided. They mostly just said they didn't agree with you, there was no outrage or one upping, and genuine discussions should be encourage
57.
▲
by
dwedge
19d ago
No I disagree here. I would argue that a TV doing this 30 years ago would find themselves in court, whereas now they are all skirting the edge of the law and we accept it because that frog has been boiling for decades. The idea that logging
58.
▲
by
dwedge
19d ago
I bought a projector in part because they are behind on this and only seem to have basic software
59.
▲
by
dwedge
19d ago
> People you interact with online almost certainly aren't bots or paid. Not all of them, and I'm not saying they target me. I noticed it more in popular engagement sinks - comments on popular instagram videos, replies on trendi
60.
▲
by
dwedge
19d ago
Sure, they exist, but online they are simulatenously unable to apply any logic and then surprisingly coherent and intelligent in the next reply.
More ›