dwaltrip

7 ms·

91.
by dwaltrip 2mo ago
If you do it mindlessly, I'm sure you are right. But one could try to understand and integrate each piece of code as they "copy" it over. May be hard to sustain though.
92.
by dwaltrip 2mo ago
#2 looks a little AI to me. I think #3 was maybe the best entry.
93.
by dwaltrip 2mo ago
For someone like Ed, it feels like way too much effort to wade through the muck. I personally can't stand anything that whiffs of "outrage content" . Doubly so if they are stupendously wrong on a regular basis. Triply so if t
94.
by dwaltrip 2mo ago
Look up how pure mathematics connects back to reality in countless unexpected and useful ways, time and time again.
95.
by dwaltrip 2mo ago
It's not bad I think. We must be open-minded and humble, like a child, and learn how the system actually works in order to be effective. Often times our first instincts will not work, so we must observe, experiment, and try again. And
96.
by dwaltrip 2mo ago
What about just using the Netflix desktop website? Or does that limit the resolution?
97.
by dwaltrip 2mo ago
Someone whose agent is spamming slop PRs is not a "user". They are an attacker to defend against. The title of "user" requires reasonable consent from the provider of the thing being "used".
98.
by dwaltrip 2mo ago
Sure, but it didn't. And you get way better results if you do that, so do that.
99.
by dwaltrip 2mo ago
Unless someone has discovered some magic sauce for getting AI to write well, I have immense sympathy for anyone trying to wade through these papers. I may generate slop from time to time, but I do my best to keep it to myself.
100.
by dwaltrip 2mo ago
> I do not trust any state, government or ruler with the power to compel speech or action. This feels too broad. What modern government doesn't compel action?
101.
by dwaltrip 2mo ago
The saying that stuck with me was "defenders have to be right 100% of the time, while attackers only have to be right once". You are suggesting this isn't correct? > a defender gets to pick the surface area What do you mea
102.
by dwaltrip 3mo ago
I've increasingly felt like Fable and I speak different dialects of English...
103.
by dwaltrip 3mo ago
It's still incredibly immature and selfish, intentional or not. I admire your empathy, though.
104.
by dwaltrip 3mo ago
You need to communicate better. One of the most important steps is to know your audience . This means you need to understand where they are coming from. Without this understanding, your words are unlikely to be correct and useful. To comm
105.
by dwaltrip 3mo ago
My story has a lot of similarities to yours… I got diagnosed with ADHD 2 years ago, at age 35. It was one of the most important things I’ve ever done. I strongly encourage you to keep looking into this. Please be gentle to yourself. You’ve
106.
by dwaltrip 3mo ago
Ironic, as you didn’t read their comment… > The value comes from the simple relationship between the text and the reader This is not some universal truth, yet you state it as such. People can get different things from a text.
107.
by dwaltrip 3mo ago
Examples? Do you use this pattern?
108.
by dwaltrip 3mo ago
I don't feel you are engaging me in good faith. You are misinterpreting what I'm saying. Good luck to you.
109.
by dwaltrip 3mo ago
Ah yes, the classic case of additional independent evidence making the claim less likely! How could I forget…
110.
by dwaltrip 3mo ago
All I can say is... Wow, what a clusterfuck.
111.
by dwaltrip 3mo ago
It seems like you are ignoring the hundreds of other signals that tell a similar story to this graph?
112.
by dwaltrip 3mo ago
Heh, fair enough! It seems you may have been infected with the LLM aesthetic :) Increasingly common these days... I've caught myself more than a few times.
113.
by dwaltrip 3mo ago
The first paragraph screamed AI to me. I'll try to dissect each bit, see below. It's hard to put it into words... --- Send an e-mail + pick up the phone . Mismatched analog. First one is outgoing, second is incoming. Yes, I kno
114.
by dwaltrip 3mo ago
Strong disagree. Fable is first model that actually feels smarter than me in certain non-trivial ways. It can hold many complex and partially contradictory thoughts in its head at once, in a way that feels significantly superior to Opus (fo
115.
by dwaltrip 3mo ago
We are in agreement!
116.
by dwaltrip 3mo ago
> Saying "I don't know, I haven't thought about it" is often met with shock if not anger. I don't have the luxury of dropping those people from my life either. There's a softer middle ground. You could try t
117.
by dwaltrip 3mo ago
Warning: Irony :) Category error: Theory of compiler != compiler
118.
by dwaltrip 3mo ago
If the only checks you have are literally someone thinking very hard , then... well... it's just extremely difficult. Few things are as difficult to check as a philosophical argument.
119.
by dwaltrip 3mo ago
Philosophy treatises don’t trigger compiler errors. More seriously, the main issue with most philosophical investigations is a question of grounding. When you start stacking abstract concepts on top of each other, things can get dicey very
120.
by dwaltrip 3mo ago
I'd add on that the models have a very poor sense of time and the complex changes in world state that occur as time passes. Training with memory is an interesting idea...

More ›