dventimihasura

9 ms·

61.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
Your response has an AI pap flavor.
62.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
> Great, but what is the mismatch you speak of? Go do some independent study and then maybe we'll talk.
63.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
> What it is about the OOP paradigm that you find does not fit this client->relational database application? It's not me who finds that OOP is a mismatch with relational systems. It's me and many other people. Ted Neward
64.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
Perhaps your request for clarification was added after I replied, or perhaps I just missed it. Charity urges me to accept the fault as mine, so please accept my apology for overlooking what surely could not have been an after the fact revis
65.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
Whether it's "active record" or "ActiveRecord", with or without caps, with or without spaces, I'm not persuaded these are different things. If you want me to believe that they are, I invite you to try to persua
66.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
> Not sure how you managed to jump all the way to Ruby on Rails. I said that ActiveRecord was popularized by Ruby on Rails in 2004. I feel I was quite clear on this subject. > Regardless, the ask was "Perhaps you could clarify
67.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
I'm the author of the comment and yet I have never used ActiveRecord, which was coined by Martin Fowler 2 years after I was using iBATIS and was popularized by Ruby on Rails a year later. As the author of the comment, I can assure you
68.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
Oh, rubbish https://youtu.be/NGAOLoYbZ6k?si=VQT5iNFhL7wZjPaL
69.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
> The most likely situation was that programmers were developing abstractions that matched well to GUIs and those abstractions most closely mapped to OOP. Bingo
70.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
No, I read the article. Did you read my comment or did you just read the first line?
71.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
Some people don't understand OOP, sure. That's the nature of things. However, many of us do understand. Consequently, nothing here comes as a surprise. And yet, we still think OOP has drawbacks where it's often applied, even
72.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
> Harder communication with coworkers, less trust, more conflicts, some people find it hard to work at home and need to be in the office ( ie they do nothing at home ), harder onboarding for new joiners, people misunderstanding the rules
73.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
What... are the negative aspects of WFH?
74.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
No, the OP says explicitly that some people do know: "OTOH it's likely to be obvious to people actually in the environment long before it has a measurable impact on any kind of balance sheet."
75.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
OTOH the OP makes unscientific claims like OTOH it's likely to be obvious to people actually in the environment long before it has a measurable impact on any kind of balance sheet in a comment complaining about other people being uns
76.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
And homelessness is out of control in Sacramento, arguably worse than SF. But, I'm sure that has nothing to do with the influx of people and rising housing costs
77.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
bingo
78.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
Bribing politicians to do what? Keeping interest rates low, that's what. At least, that's what some of the bribes are from some people.
79.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
bingo
80.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
> Putting aside your arrogance for a moment Let's put aside making and taking things personally, shall we? One way to do that is by sticking to the relevant facts, so here's a relevant fact: two of those three companies aren&
81.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
> Correlation doesn't equal causation. I know, but I wasn't asked for causation or proof. I was asked for data, or evidence. Presumably, I was being asked for evidence consistent with my hypothesis and unlikely to have occurr
82.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
> You forgot the part where a lot of these big companies are still making buckets of cash I can't forget something that's not a fact and wouldn't be relevant if it were. A lot of companies did make a lot of cash. Also, a
83.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
bingo
84.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
Yes. Homelessness in San Francisco tended to diverge from the national average over this period. So did San Francisco housing prices. This was the period of many unprofitable Bay Area and San Francisco unicorns. Now, I shared my beliefs.
85.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
It's hard to predict the future. All I can say is that these are forces pushing in various directions, creating tendencies . Personally, I would say ZIRP is a factor in income inequality, but not the only one. There are others:
86.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
I have lived in San Francisco for 25 years. Try again.
87.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
Sure. Personally, I believe San Francisco restaurants (for example) had less ability to bid up salaries in a highly-competitive labor market while using generous endowments from VCs flush with cash in a ZIRP climate in order to weather man
88.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
What the end of 0% interest rates means for people who are not software engineers: - less income inequality - less competition in the housing market - less homelessness
89.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
1. Where did VCs get the capital to fund those small to medium companies? 2. What does ZIRP do to stock appreciation? Does it tend to suppress it or enhance it? 3. What massive profits?
90.
by dventimihasura 3y ago
It seems to me like there are people who have profited from it. https://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/arsenal-home-dani...

More ›