Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dustfinger
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
dustfinger
1y ago
We are straying a bit off-topic with this, but driving a standard can actually be a lot of fun. I have an automatic right now, but I have always enjoyed driving a standard more than automatics. This next point may be due to the quality of m
62.
▲
by
dustfinger
1y ago
I would love to see something like this for GNU / Linux desktop. Great work!
63.
▲
by
dustfinger
2y ago
I'm an old person. I love emacs, no complaints here. Does this mean that when you are old, you will love emacs as well? Conclusion: in the long run, everyone loves emacs :-)
64.
▲
by
dustfinger
2y ago
Ha haa, that is fantastic. You should have joked and said - "I'd like to keep things even between us, how about $2?"
65.
▲
by
dustfinger
2y ago
> One one side, we help businesses (consultants, investors, and startups) find, connect, and learn from experts. On the other wide, we make it easy for experts to get paid to share what they know. You should fix the typos in the linked n
66.
▲
by
dustfinger
2y ago
In addition to pv, I also recommend learning about watch [1], which allows you to watch things change over time. [1]: https://linux.die.net/man/1/watch
67.
▲
by
dustfinger
2y ago
Ha, we both basically posted the same thing ( see above )!
68.
▲
by
dustfinger
2y ago
> The discovery was the result of almost exactly one year of work and about $2 million of Durant’s own money. > Durant, who made his money off the boom, said he put his time and money into the project to show people that they aren’t h
69.
▲
by
dustfinger
2y ago
Thank you so much for sharing the link. I really enjoy reading Clifford Pickover's books. As a young teen, I was inspired by Wonders of Numbers and Surfing Through Hyperspace. I am fond of the following explanations for the choice in n
70.
▲
Vampire Number
(mathworld.wolfram.com)
65 points
by
dustfinger
2y ago
|
13 comments
71.
▲
by
dustfinger
2y ago
I understand that is what they meant, but it is not what they wrote. They should have qualified the statement as you did, with the conditions that yield a runtime error. Even if they generalized those conditions that would have been fine. f
72.
▲
by
dustfinger
2y ago
> or tries to access a library I had to open the PDF and find this line to confirm. It really says that. It reads as if claiming that any program that accesses a library will then have a runtime error. That is obviously not what they int
73.
▲
by
dustfinger
2y ago
What is your tech stack? What are the required skills for this role?
74.
▲
Ask HN: Should I differentiate between contract and full-time?
2 points
by
dustfinger
2y ago
|
3 comments
75.
▲
by
dustfinger
2y ago
How does Howm compare to org brain? especially in terms of scalability.
76.
▲
0
(en.wikipedia.org)
7 points
by
dustfinger
2y ago
|
0 comments
77.
▲
by
dustfinger
2y ago
Edward Leedskainin [1] was the builder of Coral Castle [2] and the inspiration for Billy Idol's Sweet Sixteen [3]. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Leedskalnin [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org
78.
▲
Magnetic Current – Ed Leedskalnin (1945)
(archive.org)
1 points
by
dustfinger
2y ago
|
1 comments
79.
▲
Directed Energy: The Focus on Laser Weapons Intensifies
(rand.org)
1 points
by
dustfinger
2y ago
|
1 comments
80.
▲
Directed Energy: The Focus on Laser Weapons Intensifies
(rand.org)
3 points
by
dustfinger
2y ago
|
0 comments
81.
▲
Magnetic Current – Ed Leedskalnin (1945)
(archive.org)
2 points
by
dustfinger
2y ago
|
0 comments
82.
▲
by
dustfinger
2y ago
> Once you have AGI, you can... So if Superintelligence depends on AGI, then we can't say: > Superintelligence is within reach. until we can say AGI is within reach. Is there any substantive evidence supporting the revised claim?
83.
▲
by
dustfinger
2y ago
> Superintelligence is within reach. Don't we need to achieve general artificial intelligence first? Or is this "super" intelligence just that? To me, super intelligence would be beyond our own and therefore beyond general
84.
▲
by
dustfinger
2y ago
I attempted to clarify my statement in my response to sneak. I am concerned that if there are people in government acting nefariously, these bad actors are free to continue unchallenged. If that is what is happening, then I suspect that thi
85.
▲
by
dustfinger
2y ago
You make a good point, I was not clear at all on the scope of my statement. I am thinking about my own countries constitution. I am not familiar with UKs constitution [1], so I don't really know if "control chat" violates the
86.
▲
by
dustfinger
2y ago
I agree with 0-strikes. Elect officials should be under constant investigation for any form of nefarious behavior and they should be prosecuted as any citzen would be.
87.
▲
by
dustfinger
2y ago
1. Roughly how many hours did you spend on the two bug reports (from recon to publication) that you have posted on your blog? 2. How extensive is your background in networking, blockchain programming and pen testing? 3. How many other bount
88.
▲
by
dustfinger
2y ago
Is this meant to supersede starlink roam [1]? [1]: https://www.starlink.com/ca/roam
89.
▲
by
dustfinger
2y ago
Can anyone identify the object on the table to her right?
90.
▲
by
dustfinger
2y ago
That falls under my first case. I improved my answer to make it more clear.
More ›