dusted

24 ms·

361.
by dusted 3y ago
Definitely, if you just need some nand gates, this is probably the worst way of doing it, where it can be of some use is when you want to describe more complex behavior, where you quickly end up with a mix of tens, hundreds or thousands of
362.
by dusted 3y ago
Yes, however, it's best suited for the complex parts (logic that needs a lot of inputs and few outputs) due to the fact that the eeproms it generates data for are arranged as 8 bit output. It might also be somewhat slow compared to dis
363.
by dusted 3y ago
That's some cyberpunk dystopia right there, gross. (Don't get me wrong, I _LOVE_ cyberpunk dystopia, in my entertainment fiction, music, art and vide-ogames, but not IRL please)
364.
Show HN: Use an EEPROM as Programmable Logic(github.com)
22 points by dusted 3y ago|15 comments
365.
Show HN: A lispy way of making EEPROMs act like programmable logic(github.com)
1 points by dusted 3y ago|0 comments
366.
by dusted 3y ago
It's 2023, the world had a collective brain hemorrhage and now prefer to define their GUIs via two seperate text files.
367.
by dusted 3y ago
I've collected some documentation and am planning on building a computer around it, first things first, is bringing it up, checking if the clock is working and if I can get it to jump into the ODT :)
368.
Show HN: Pretty photos of my DEC J-11 CPU(dusted.dk)
5 points by dusted 3y ago|3 comments
369.
by dusted 3y ago
This is practically impossible, given that the game likely sends a binary delta-compression of game-state, and so unless you entirely and accurately reverse-engineer all associated data structures and the protocol, you have no way of tellin
370.
by dusted 3y ago
Pretty sure it went the same place as native apps and reasonable graphical user interfaces.
371.
by dusted 3y ago
If you think it looks pretty, and it's your code base, then yes. If it's an existing code base and you're not the sole owner, discuss it with the others.
372.
by dusted 3y ago
I was banned on the mastodon instance I was on for saying that people should have the same rights regardless on the color of their skin, so I decided that probably the people who leave for Mastodon are not the ones I should spend any time w
373.
by dusted 3y ago
> (ironically, most of them are still using X, formally known as Twitter). Dunno, feels like the only people leaving X was the people who didn't use X anyway.. I've been using it with the same frequency as before Musik took ov
374.
by dusted 3y ago
Oh DAMN! This is so bad it's good!
375.
by dusted 3y ago
It seems obvious that this AND was added as one does a list of things, "Add sugar, flour AND water." but in a conditional, which makes it possible to construe a different meaning. In my understanding, the court should strive to in
376.
by dusted 3y ago
> otherwise “surf the web” as people honest to god called it, What else to call it ? browsing the web ?
377.
by dusted 3y ago
Literally interpreting your question: If you know python, and it can do the job, then there's no reason not to chose it. However, there are many cases where it can't do the job, and in those cases, the question is obviously, becau
378.
by dusted 3y ago
> DAWs are built on legacy code that can’t easily be pivoted as user expectation adjusts, As opposed to "non-legacy" code which is obviously malleable and easily adjustable to whatever new user expectation may arise?
379.
by dusted 3y ago
This can be humbling http://abx.digitalfeed.net/list.html just try flac vs 128kbit.. I swear I used to be able to distinguish 320kbit, now I struggle with 96k :s Age and loud music...
380.
by dusted 3y ago
>to make sure I'm productive over this time? Is the purpose of the retreat to the middle of nowhere to be productive ? Why do you think you need to make sure you're productive ? If the purpose of your retreat is to be productiv
381.
by dusted 3y ago
and thanks to the higher powers for that.
382.
by dusted 3y ago
Yeah, the RME Digiface USB seems like it'd fit the bill, and then just do optical from one computer to this device. However, it's rather expensive for my case where I basically just want to pipe audio from one computer into anothe
383.
by dusted 3y ago
There are issues with the simple "line out -> line in" solution. First an aesthetic one: You're doing a totally unnecessary step, converting digital audio to analogue in the device on the "sending" computer, and
384.
by dusted 3y ago
The S/PDIF route is interesting, it might be the closest option, I think the card you linked to actually only does spdif output. I'll investigate this further. I'm probably going to order some USB > i2s chips and optocoupl
385.
by dusted 3y ago
> Low-latency and USB are incompatible things. When I have a network device connected via USB it is typical to have 1000+ ms pings as a worst case. You won't achieve real-time latencies, but you'll get close enough for any pra
386.
by dusted 3y ago
I'm doing that atm, using jack on both boxes, but it requires waay more configuration and fiddling to get working well. a physical usb connection would provide an intuitive, default-supported way to transfer the data, the audio class s
387.
Ask HN: Does this USB audio device exist?
5 points by dusted 3y ago|20 comments
388.
by dusted 3y ago
Good point, got me thinking.. No matter the headline, audience will filter by it.. In this case, the question form, might be the more neutral, where the alternatives would lead more to echo-chambering. The question is unresolved, so no matt
389.
by dusted 3y ago
I've reached the point where I'm assuming absolutely anything brought to my attention via a digital device is a scam. I'll also assume anything sent to me by letter is a scam. You'll need to show up in person, and if I d
390.
by dusted 3y ago
I don't have any opinion on his guilt, that is for the court to decide. However, I do believe it's wrong to start sanctioning people for a crime they've not yet been found guilty of.

More ›