dugidugout

6 ms·

31.
by dugidugout 6mo ago
I should've edited my comment, on reflection my example doesn't fit! I think rincebrain had a nice way of wording what I now believe to be your intent!
32.
by dugidugout 6mo ago
This can be true I suppose, but equally I have a few friends who practically play characters as if they've resigned themselves to a role in a sitcom. For instance: one of my friends is late to just about everything and treats everyone
33.
by dugidugout 6mo ago
I'll add Oreck to the list! Their commercial vacs [0] are robust (the design is dead simple) and overall a refreshing packaging in a bizzaro land where lights and sensors are prioritized over weight and profile! Although I did hear the
34.
by dugidugout 7mo ago
I think you are still speaking in the lower abstraction in terms of zwaps' provided understanding. "Tagging specific code" or "files" is likely the type of interfacing most Claude Code users are _not_ doing. Instead
35.
by dugidugout 7mo ago
I sure enjoyed reading your account of the experience! Thank you!
36.
by dugidugout 7mo ago
I think you are right to treat this with sensitivity, but I do find a lot of what you say here to be at odds. Is this the framing provided to you from the fellow in question or entirely yours? Ultimately you are asking a deeply philosophica
37.
by dugidugout 7mo ago
Would you mind sharing your insight? I'd be interested to hear!
38.
by dugidugout 7mo ago
The latest level of abstraction! You just release your ideas half baked in some internet connected box and wake up with products! Yahoo! Onwards into the Gestell!
39.
by dugidugout 7mo ago
I enjoyed this read. Thank you for sharing!
40.
by dugidugout 7mo ago
[Jellyfin]( https://jellyfin.org/ ) is a great alternative to Plex if you haven't taken a look!
41.
by dugidugout 8mo ago
It isn't clear you wish to discuss anything with me at all. Why do you seem to be feigning as much?
42.
by dugidugout 8mo ago
I second Mahjong Soul!
43.
by dugidugout 8mo ago
I mean the barriers you are describing are at the same time why I and others enjoy playing fighting games. Further, I dont know when you've tried picking one up last, but any title in the last few years has plenty of concern for "
44.
by dugidugout 8mo ago
A romantic perspective I still try and hold myself, however the point about the watch and the cloth and the dwindling appreciation for such is presently experienced in reference to decades or centuries of disruption and are intrinsically ti
45.
by dugidugout 8mo ago
I was not replying to your remark, but rather, a later comment regarding the "validity" vs "sensibility". I don't see where I made any distinction concerning wanting to wash cars. But now I suppose I'll engage
46.
by dugidugout 8mo ago
I wasn't under the impression anyone was discussing car washing.
47.
by dugidugout 8mo ago
Because validity doesn't depend on meaning. Take the classic example: "What is north of the North Pole?". This is a valid phrasing of a question, but is meaningless without extra context about spherical geometry. The trick qu
48.
by dugidugout 9mo ago
I didn't feel much at all. It's simply a rhetorical question which sets up the explicit claim being made in the title of the article. The structure is quite clear if you account for the entire text which I'm sure the author i
49.
by dugidugout 9mo ago
I'd be quick to assume the ":-)" in this context indicates it is not an actual question.
50.
by dugidugout 9mo ago
It isn't very meaningful to assert your arbitrary threshold for "life-changing" as a criteria to measure one's life. It is quite distracting as a closer to an otherwise thoughtful reply.
51.
by dugidugout 9mo ago
Especially on the topic of value! We are all intuitively aware that value is highly contextual, but get in a knot trying to rationalize value long past genuine engagement!
52.
by dugidugout 9mo ago
Sounds like you made your side just fine. The "head or tails" is currently whether one thinks those ICE gunmen should be on that block, with their uniform, and with their orders.
53.
by dugidugout 9mo ago
Ah! I confused your intent myself! > I guess I'm trying to understand how widespread and serious the problem of cheaters using AI/computer cheats actually is. It is undoubtedly more widespread. > I know Counter Strike back i
54.
by dugidugout 9mo ago
We are likely on different footing as I quite enjoy games of all form. Here is my attempt to formalize my argument: Claim 1: Cheating is endemic to competition across all formats (physical or digital) Claim 2: Despite this, games survive an
55.
by dugidugout 9mo ago
> I know pre-AI cheats have ruined some online games, so I'm not sure it's an encouraging thought... Will you be even more discouraged if I share that "table flipping" and "sleight of hand" have ruined many
56.
by dugidugout 9mo ago
> But I'm out of the loop: in order to maintain popularity, are computers banned? Firsrly, yes, you will be banned for playing at an AI level consecutively on most platforms. Secondly, its not very relevant to the concept of gaming.
57.
by dugidugout 9mo ago
What is the meaning of quotations here?
58.
by dugidugout 9mo ago
I'm not sure, but it sounds like something biocentrism adjacent. My reference to Hume is the fact you are jumping from what is to what ought without justifying why. _A Treatise of Human Nature_ is a good place to start.
59.
by dugidugout 9mo ago
This belief isnt novel, it just doesnt engage with Hume, who many take very seriously.
60.
by dugidugout 9mo ago
They mean to distinguish intuition, which draws on experience and can only be reflected on, from experience, which deals in actionable heuristics. Any appeal to intuition you make will fall on experiential advice when pressed. Intuition _wo

More ›