Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dualogy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
51 ms
·
481.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
Yeah 'enable' but they clearly don't seem to drive mass adoption in and of themselves
482.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
> The internet was supposed to be decentralized but we ended up with individual companies taking huge monopolies I think that's perhaps one of the most fascinating lessons of the last 1-1.5 decades. As far as anyone can tell, there
483.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
DEMs: how high-res do you really need the DEMs, how many petabytes will you sacrifice for sub-meter accuracy? Unless the app is for mountaineers, what's out there for free in lower-res (to be interpolated by varying to-be-experimente
484.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
I was aware of heat-sensitive vitamins/vitamers but not minerals, TIL!
485.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
Only ascorbic acid, or ascorbate in general?
486.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
> Most runtimes aren't making syscalls directly. They go through glibc, musl, etc. So the're going through C to get to the Unices. In otherwords, they don't have Unices: they have C. Good point, that!
487.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
At the time I think Java was a god-send, in terms of impact, if only for a short while. At least from the limited perspective of the code-bro-kiddie that I was back then, it filled a glaringly empty spot perfectly: that of transitioning fro
488.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
Blurry distinction. C has Unices but so has everything else, other than .NET-before-a-half-mature-Mono and decades-out-of-date historic win/dos-only langs/IDEs/compilers. So things like momentum/inertia, fewer-stumblin
489.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
> Could PureScript become a more viable and practical Haskell? Probably depends on the reasons why anyone might perceive Haskell as sub-viable or sub-practical in the first place (other than for transpiling to other languages with possib
490.
▲
A lot of Websockets in Haskell
(blog.wearewizards.io)
1 points
by
dualogy
10y ago
|
0 comments
491.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
Been scanning the thread to find this stance, and there I go! Good to know I'm not entirely alone there =)
492.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
Haven't done it all that long, after C# I first went Go for a few years, and spent much time with GL shaders and such too. Haven't done such "real-world" stuff (with a proper server side, client side, data side etc) in H
493.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
How about, JIRA is an issue tracker last I checked, SAP has provided a wide range of corp/biz solutions from ERP to what-not since the early 70s...
494.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
Sure but the more you do this, the more tools/commands/libraries/modules have to ideally both document and remember, realistically neither.. Cognitive overload. Shell commands with their args ... core syntaxes for half a doze
495.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
Doing Haskell nowadays, been years since touching C# --- maybe my memory is fooling me but didn't have C# "structs" (or whatever they were called) from the very start? What else exactly are "record types" if not tho
496.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
.
497.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
Your post might possibly drown soon here, so.. > I'm really not sure where to turn for help. both StackOverflow and reddit.com/r/<yourproglanguage> have rarely if ever failed me..
498.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
> If you just move from Angular to React or whatever other thing is hot right now every year for 20 years but don't understand what fundamentals they are based on That person would have to be (and remain so for 20) spectacularly,
499.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
> If they're still useful to know, how can I learn about them today? By reading the article instead of lamenting lamentations ;)
500.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
> Lawn mowers are already safe enough to operate in nothing but your underwear And if in doubt, just wear under-armour instead..
501.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
> Buy a goat Nah. What we really want and need is a robot that while it mows the lawn, turns it into: its entire energy source, its entire pool of building blocks for daily (nightly?) self-repairs, for reproduction, for producing oh ma
502.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
Guess I'll not be a coward & hurry! To study Howard & Curry.
503.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
Some of his conference talks can be found on YT too, recommended
504.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
True that! That last bit of my post was quite thoughtless
505.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
My bad, I meant mostly the carnivore livers but failed to spell this out properly
506.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
> except for fairly straightforward things like "eat vitamin C or you will get scurvy". Even that's a myth, funnily enough. You don't need ascorbic acid per se, you just need.. ascorbate. With the acid we can synthesi
507.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
> today it’s the polyphenols and carotenoids that seem all-important What a joke, the only thing that's known for sure about "polyphenols" (and practically all non-vitamin "antioxidants", that was the previous
508.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
> "Plants" covers a diverse group of foods, some of which are the most nutrient rich available to us. That's some meme. Which ones exactly? The most nutrient- dense foods (per gram / per kcal) available to us are liv
509.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
> If a couple esoteric languagn features take an extra few hours to learn but reduce LOC tenfold, it's a price I'd pay every time. Issue is that a beginner pre-conditioned long enough on "verboser, imperativer" mode
510.
▲
by
dualogy
10y ago
Crikey that takes me back. Almost 12 years ago! I was 23 then and big-time into .NET but caught wind of this and watched it (hooray for student housing with decent net speeds -- sometimes, off-peak!) with an amused smirk as so much other te
More ›