dtx1

72 ms·

811.
by dtx1 6y ago
It uses darkhttpd https://unix4lyfe.org/darkhttpd/
812.
by dtx1 6y ago
Sry, not my blog just thought it's interesting
813.
This Blog is now hosted on a GPS/LTE modem(nns.ee)
711 points by dtx1 6y ago|201 comments
814.
by dtx1 6y ago
> You are doing the same thing again. You are assuming a level of "work just fine" without having a comparison for what it would look like with telemetry. Ignoring the privacy issues for a second, can you say definitively that
815.
by dtx1 6y ago
> Because Google is responsible for most of the software on said product. Who would be receiving that telemetry data if it wasn't Google? Depends, on Android maybe. On my Android Device, not really i don't use google software w
816.
by dtx1 6y ago
So why does $product need to send telemetry data via google? Why can highly complex software that runs most of the worlds internet infrastructure (linux) work without telemetry? Why is telemetry not opt-in or relies on reports in situation
817.
by dtx1 6y ago
i googled "anonymous data collection + $carrier + opt out" in german and they had a website
818.
by dtx1 6y ago
thank you! I just found out i can opt out of this and did. However, selling anonymized data is better then selling non-anonymized data. Nevertheless, these carriers and the people who think this is in any way shape or form even remotely ok
819.
by dtx1 6y ago
No, in the EU it's a violation of your personal rights due to GDPR and in many EU Countries there are local laws that mirror this. This is very much an American failure to have democratic control over what large businesses do.
820.
by dtx1 6y ago
Both I suspect. OpenWRT sacrifices safety to work on low power devices i.e. no https package updates.
821.
by dtx1 6y ago
I'd say anything remotely security relevant.
822.
by dtx1 6y ago
That's great news if any of these companies cannot or won't reply to your GDPR Deletion Request you can grab a default payment of at least 1k Euro just for that. Please name them, maybe i hit the jackpot with one of them
823.
by dtx1 6y ago
Good to get out a response out quick, but this is too quick, the audio is garbage.
824.
by dtx1 6y ago
> I disagree, they provide value by keeping premium domains available for people with money. how does keeping domains away from people with little money provide any value? > Or not, it could have been claimed (e.g. for a hobby project
825.
by dtx1 6y ago
live boot from a usb stick might be better.
826.
by dtx1 6y ago
Try it, it could potentially work in Sway, i don't have a VRR card but multiple refresh rates on different displays works there
827.
by dtx1 6y ago
* Security Benefits, maybe! * No more screen tearing * Multiple Displays with multiple different refresh rates, on some compositors (sway can do it!) * HWVideo Acceleration for firefox (on some setups) * it can be faster in some situations
828.
by dtx1 6y ago
now do a pcie reset and vfio without the bs!
829.
Quantum physics needs complex numbers (2021)(arxiv.org)
1 points by dtx1 6y ago|0 comments
830.
by dtx1 6y ago
"your data" falls into at least elements and aws hands with this. Yeah the content is encrypted but there's lots of metadata to grab by malicous actors. The reality is 10$ for 25 Users would have been more reasonable. Enough
831.
by dtx1 6y ago
It never even occured to me to use the menu version. What an upgrade
832.
by dtx1 6y ago
You don't say! I would have thought this is a historic drama about the military industrial complex if you hadn't warned me!
833.
by dtx1 6y ago
I thought about this immediately. Uncanny how similar the situation is
834.
by dtx1 6y ago
So, they did a bradley https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXQ2lO3ieBA
835.
by dtx1 6y ago
Got this compiled and can confirm it works. https://git.rip/mirror/gitlab/fuck-capitalism/spotifykeydump... I'd suggest downloading it now before it inevitably gets nuked again
836.
by dtx1 6y ago
> military test missile above a civilian airplane?! That's pretty scary
837.
Airliner Encountered Unidentified Fast-Moving Cylindrical Object over New Mexico(thedrive.com)
7 points by dtx1 6y ago|6 comments
838.
by dtx1 6y ago
yeah that will probably work but since spotify is already sending a lossy compressed audio file, you'll still get some quality loss due to compressing it twice. Also seems really inconvenient, especially since i'd want to do this
839.
by dtx1 6y ago
Is it? I've been unsuccessful so far with the obvious exception of ripping the output stream and reencoding that. If you find a way to rip music from spoitfy, i'd be interested
840.
by dtx1 6y ago
no, that comparison doesn't really work. If your buisness model requires large scale censorship of the internet to remain profitable, then your buisness model is broken. This was true in the 90s where downloading a few thousand mp3s wa

More ›