dsp1234

74 ms·

631.
by dsp1234 11y ago
There is an ethics/philosophy thought experiment (which I'm failing to remember the name of), which goes a little something like this (modified for the AI example): Imagine that in the world as it stands today that the accidental
632.
by dsp1234 11y ago
One of react's core tenets is unidirectional data flow. Trying to use it in a bidirectional way is... painful. There is also a struggle with state vs props. The quick version is that state is internal to a component and is changeabl
633.
by dsp1234 11y ago
You can come around to the espoused best practices organically. As I said before, it's reasonable that some people are not going to like these particular best practices, and that in some instances it's going to get in the way. A
634.
by dsp1234 11y ago
It's certainly a weird phrasing of an argument. However, it seems reasonable that some programmers will not like the specific style of structure that react espouses. Specifically the top-down push of data through parent-child compone
635.
by dsp1234 11y ago
FTA: Q: "Are you still sad?" A: "... Consider another stack that better suites[sic] your needs (eg. Ember)" The author has anticipated that react is not always the solution that is appropriate, and provided guidance in t
636.
by dsp1234 11y ago
Indeed the issue that trips up many of the people I've worked with is that CLUSTER will make a table seem like the clustered index of other systems (in as much as it physically orders the table), but without an appropriately large fill
637.
by dsp1234 11y ago
This is actually addressed in the 'relevance' link above, and was the preamble to the text that I quoted. "On the Web, even if such a group of confederated webmasters existed, it requires their active and willful participatio
638.
by dsp1234 11y ago
I was specifically envisioning something like a government sponsored, or affiliated conference like speaking at an NOAA, DOD, etc workshop (which could fall under "attempt to influence ... government... parties"), which again is w
639.
by dsp1234 11y ago
Indeed it does [0] [0] - https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/260563
640.
by dsp1234 11y ago
Isn't that what the 'Confusion reigns' in the title referring to? FTA: "On 6 February, the government announced that any groups in receipt of public money will be banned from using those funds to attempt to influence eit
641.
by dsp1234 11y ago
From the relevance link: "by divorcing interface from information, Gopher sites stand and shine on the strength of their content and not the glitz of their bling." Forcing content creators to focus on the strength of their content
642.
by dsp1234 11y ago
React Native doesn't claim "code once, deploy everywhere", and in fact embraces native APIs where appropriate. As a reference, their slogan is "learn once, write anywhere". In other words, learn React Native, and
643.
by dsp1234 11y ago
I agree that X is not true, but object strongly to the idea that it would lead to Y. If the courts threw up their hands and said "It is literally impossible to adjudicate this issue of the binary kernel module", then who is le
644.
by dsp1234 11y ago
I didn't claim that at all. The other poster stated a partial argument that "who the hell are we gonna find that A) is actually qualified to judge this sort of thing". I then stated that IF literally no one was able to adj
645.
by dsp1234 11y ago
That's a good question. Apparently Debian got the ok from the Software Freedom Law Center[0], but they distribute it as source only, and the binary is built on the end user's computer (and they consider it then unredistributable).
646.
by dsp1234 11y ago
Seriously, I don't understand what you're arguing here. I'll try to be a little clearer, but it's basically what I started with and ended with (which you actually appear to agree with) 1.) SFC says 'in this contex
647.
by dsp1234 11y ago
True, but we were not discussing general GPL violations. But specifically the murkiness of the binary kernel module 'exceptions' (or if they are not actually derivative works in the first place, and thus not really 'exception
648.
by dsp1234 11y ago
One would assume that Canonical would be sued, and basically any individual kernel contributor (or someone like the SFC) could do it. I agree it's unlikely, which is why I hoped for a court case, because it's just another 'e
649.
by dsp1234 11y ago
No need to "Arrgh.". I'm asking serious questions that seem relevant, in which I'm interesting in getting actual opinions. And if they don't consent and Oracle does, surely the community can duplicate the effort q
650.
by dsp1234 11y ago
This is a copyright issue just like any other. Thus the normal court system should be able to make a decision one way or the other. If the reality is that literally no one is capable of adjudicating this issue, then there is literally n
651.
by dsp1234 11y ago
Does Oracle own the code for all of the existent OpenZFS code that Canonical imported? If not, then doesn't there exist the same issue that all of the developers would also need to relicense?
652.
by dsp1234 11y ago
in this context, Oracle could make everyone's life easier by waving their magic relicensing wand. Well, so could the linux developers by relicensing to MIT. That's not much of an argument. Additionally, I'd still love to s
653.
by dsp1234 11y ago
In Chrome you can have javascript disabled by default, then whitelist all of the javascript on individual hosts (it does execute all of the javascript on the page, as compared to noscript). Then on each host, Chrome starts off with no javas
654.
by dsp1234 11y ago
By the way, why does Google NOT provide this link when I search for "Untied"? Because Google has (reasonably) understood that it was likely a incorrectly spelled request for united.com, which is clearly evident from just looking
655.
by dsp1234 11y ago
I could rip a piece of paper with my bare hands. Give me 300 million pieces of paper sandwiched together and I couldn't.
656.
by dsp1234 11y ago
Note that the URL of the live stream appeared to be wrong for me. was: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fCEeAgeRC0 should be: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pi62S_MvheE
657.
by dsp1234 11y ago
Maybe I wasn't clear. She finds items in other places, ships them to the amazon warehouse, then sets the price +5%.
658.
by dsp1234 11y ago
A friend of mine who does online arbitrage takes advantage of this. She'll take the lowest non-prime eligible price, mark it up 5% then set it to be 'fulfilled by amazon'. She knows that people will prefer Prime, even if a
659.
by dsp1234 11y ago
I'd certainly pay quite a bit for the original drawing/painting for the Tarrasque[0] [0] - http://www.monkeyinthecage.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Ta...
660.
by dsp1234 11y ago
I get full HD bitrates through pipelight (looking at the hidden menu in pipelight shows it at the highest bitrate). I'm not at my house right now, but I think it's generally in the 3500kbps range (or some number in the 3k range i

More ›