dsirijus

55 ms·

511.
by dsirijus 14y ago
I'm not are you aware of it, but you should pivot your start-up to something more in the lines of computer/bed/workplace/food sharing thingie for young enterpreneurs. And they pay you by their coding/designing man-hours (which you use to fu
512.
by dsirijus 14y ago
You don't need to call me old-fashioned - I am. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_ludens http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptonomicon Just my 2 cents on the list that actually matters.
513.
by dsirijus 14y ago
Been running a little through all the vids of it around. I'm still undecided. Perspective on each supposedly "fake" screenshot could explain the mismatch. In your example, you actually don't see how far his fingers are apart. Also, it might
514.
by dsirijus 14y ago
And I assume those 50% Lenovos were in the MacBook Pro price range? Meaning, just the Xs?
515.
by dsirijus 14y ago
My rabbit chews a lot of cables. He chewed iPhone charger - I almost cried. He chewed other cables too - I've bought them just round the corner at thrift shop dirt cheap. I've seen at least 2 iPhones breaking beyond repair just by falling.
516.
by dsirijus 14y ago
As a rapid game producer, I'm calling this bullshit. Fastest rapid game dev is with Flash, and nothing has come even close to it (just poke around game dev jams). Now, if you need mobile support, go with HaXe, it has HTML5 target too. As we
517.
by dsirijus 14y ago
No, I attract hard working, no nonsense people who take joy in getting things done with least amount of friction, and who don't need masseuse to write code.
518.
by dsirijus 14y ago
I couldn't agree with this one more. I only swim upstream if I have absolutely no other choice, courtesy of the Deadline. But here's the thing - there's always Deadline. :)
519.
by dsirijus 14y ago
At my place, you get name.surname@mycompany.com and can have as many aliases as you want, I don't care - I'll always send you mail to name.surname@mycompany.com. How is it NOT geeky to have local mail parts in friggin' order? Also, even if
520.
by dsirijus 14y ago
Worst thing for me is that I actually feel completely out of place actually building my company up last 6 months so I can take on an idea I have, completely self-funded.
521.
by dsirijus 14y ago
This is the reason this guy works at MIT and not Apple.
522.
by dsirijus 14y ago
Pay for friend accept.
523.
by dsirijus 14y ago
Yes, quite right. It's superfluous.
524.
by dsirijus 14y ago
Sending stuff for approval and approving stuff done. This is a busy day, though.
525.
by dsirijus 14y ago
Yes and no to that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregardless
526.
by dsirijus 14y ago
My sample is tainted now. Someone else should do it.
527.
by dsirijus 14y ago
Of course it has. Not significantly.
528.
by dsirijus 14y ago
Yes. I misunderstood. I know for a fact that most of those contacted do not use Gmail. Only one confirmedly does. There might be other corporate non-public solutions that do that, on the other hand.
529.
by dsirijus 14y ago
Yes. Never reply-to-all. No subject.
530.
by dsirijus 14y ago
No, no e-mail sent nor received had any mention of Alex in any way outside him being in Cc. I hardly believe it's at all illegal to have an e-mail address in Cc field, even if it's imaginary. E-mail isn't Facebook. :)
531.
by dsirijus 14y ago
I send mails every (week) day, and favor it in front of any other form of business communication. I've sent 17 since I've started this thread.
532.
by dsirijus 14y ago
Well, it's gone public now, it's tainted. I'm already receiving "You sleazy bastard. :)" mails.
533.
by dsirijus 14y ago
But this technically isn't diffusion. It's concentration of responsibility.
534.
by dsirijus 14y ago
Most of the recipients are contacted on relatively regular basis (some daily, some weekly, some monthly).
535.
by dsirijus 14y ago
Alex was not CEO, he was CEO assistant, but that doesn't matter at all since no one actually sent mails from that address, and subsequently have not read the his mail sig. The adress was alex@your_company.com
536.
by dsirijus 14y ago
No, I don't use priority inbox.
537.
by dsirijus 14y ago
Content is the same, but that's obviously subjective. The conversations were either all with alex or without, meaning, no reply requests were sent to the pre-alex mail with alex in cc and I haven't split tested.
538.
by dsirijus 14y ago
It was not rigorous, but here they are... Pre-Alex I've ran through 5 months of mails, which amounted to ~5k mails, and sorted them out (there was already label Waiting done for me). Post-Alex, in 2 months of mails the sample size was ~2k m
539.
by dsirijus 14y ago
Because in most of those mails it was mission critical that I receive the response. The process grinds to a halt if I don't receive response, irregardless of anyone and anything else. Both Alex and I were tied to the same process and action
540.
by dsirijus 14y ago
Well, I've always tried to construct my e-mails to the best of my ability. I didn't noticed any change in my content - it has all been pretty standard.

More ›