drugstorecowboy

7 ms·

31.
by drugstorecowboy 4y ago
I can certainly understand that there are unqualified people who apply, what I'm disputing is your assertion that there is a correlation between doing the contrived problems under unrealistic conditions and future job performance. It s
32.
by drugstorecowboy 4y ago
But.. why? Does that reflect anything close to the job they would be doing? Is handicapping someone in every way (You will google it for them), putting them on the spot in an already tense situation and expecting them to code while you watc
33.
by drugstorecowboy 4y ago
When people are so generously out there "helping people grow" in tactful ways, much of the time the benevolent helper doesn't actually know how to do that. People generally make what they think are rational decisions, it alwa
34.
by drugstorecowboy 4y ago
Wow, his family as well huh? Why stop there, do the soldiers on the ground share no responsibility? What about his supporters in Russia? Strange how that type of "justice" seems to never lead to a more just world isn't it? Wh
35.
by drugstorecowboy 4y ago
How would this work exactly? I buy stock in Oregon and live there for 5 years holding the stock. I then move to Idaho and sell the stock for a profit. How would you calculate what percent of the taxes should go where? Was Oregon doing somet
36.
by drugstorecowboy 4y ago
Why would people slow spending due to a fixed money supply? The money they have now could potentially buy more in the future, but at some point you have to actually buy the thing you need or want. Conversely in in an inflating currency scen
37.
by drugstorecowboy 4y ago
> “Essential workers” are pretty fucking pissed millions sat on their ass with no clue how to feed or care for themselves. They are not showing the same allegiance to shit jobs and moving on. They never had allegiance, they didn't l
38.
by drugstorecowboy 4y ago
"Slightly Left" but the only journalist you trust is Rachel Maddow? That is a very interesting take, I have never heard Maddow described as anything remotely resembling slightly left, only as a caricature of the extreme left.
39.
by drugstorecowboy 4y ago
You are certainly in the minority though, given that millions of people drove much faster than 30mph daily for many many years with neither. Seatbelts weren't even required in cars in the US until 1968, airbags in the 90's. Anecdo
40.
by drugstorecowboy 4y ago
Forgetting the politics of this for a minute, given 2 choices 1. Do Nothing 2. Take a drug that might not help but almost certainly won't hurt, why is option 1 the obvious and logical choice? If I had some disease and hundreds or peopl
41.
by drugstorecowboy 5y ago
I'm not sure how that would refute GP, perhaps people prefer the salty fries due to salt deficiency...
42.
by drugstorecowboy 5y ago
Is this about socialists, democrats, or the American left? I don't believe that restricting home construction is a tenant of socialism, the democrats nor the left. This entire article is just a rambling, semi-coherent attack against a
43.
by drugstorecowboy 5y ago
I feel like my doctor is in a better position to decide, if I don't like the results I can find a new doctor. If things continue on their current course that will no longer be an option as every doctor will be afraid to use their actua
44.
by drugstorecowboy 5y ago
No, but the CDC isn't my manufacturer so I'm not sure this applies.
45.
by drugstorecowboy 5y ago
Who decides what the best available science is? It certainly seems to me right now that "best available science" means "whatever the people in charge say". Here's a question for you while we are passing the popcorn,
46.
by drugstorecowboy 5y ago
If doctors are only allowed to parrot whatever the current narrative is, why even have them? This is such a dangerous road to go down, the US will tear itself in two if things don't change course.
47.
by drugstorecowboy 5y ago
Take a moment and look up Borderline Personality Disorder. "Walking on Eggshells" is a gigantic red flag. I suspect it might change your whole perspective.
48.
by drugstorecowboy 5y ago
The cheaper something is to produce, the more of it one can produce and hence the greater the supply. This only affects the price if there are competitors. If I want a widget, the total supply of widgets is irrelevant. For example Insulin
49.
by drugstorecowboy 5y ago
Wouldn't movie critics tend to be people to like movies in general? What about critics that stick to their preferred genre? They might start out pre-disposed to liking movies which could wipe out the effect of your assertion completely
50.
by drugstorecowboy 5y ago
That makes sense, thank you for the clarification. I apologize, I should not have worded my former comment so strongly.
51.
by drugstorecowboy 5y ago
I am definitely not a scientist, but speculating on race because of names you find to be too hispanic to be white feels like spectacularly bad science to me. This is not my field though so perhaps that is normal an accepted.
52.
by drugstorecowboy 5y ago
So, women are abused sometimes therefore doctor's must mask their numbers due to the Hippocratic Oath and HIPAA? Do the doctor's have to disguise their voices as well? Maybe they should talk in code. I won't pretend to be an
53.
by drugstorecowboy 5y ago
While I do understand this reasoning somewhat I don't know why its only limited to hospitals and doctors. I can imagine thousands of situations where this abusive partner would have a problem with an incoming number hospital or not. I&
54.
by drugstorecowboy 5y ago
Uhh what? So the price people are willing to pay dictates the worth, what exactly is your point here then? That scalpers are bad people because they make a profit?
55.
by drugstorecowboy 5y ago
The price people are willing to pay is who determines the actual worth of the ticket. Doesn't matter if its from the ticket booth or the scalper.Do people sell tickets for less than the concert costs to produce where you live? Thats a
56.
by drugstorecowboy 5y ago
No, grandparent is absolutely correct. It's not magic, if they charged what tickets are actually worth, there would be no scalpers. That is not a libertarian fantasy or anything close to it, in fact it's not even controversial.
57.
by drugstorecowboy 5y ago
Well.. yes that would be a win for the artist. As would a sales tax that goes to artists, or a new law that legalizes pickpocketing for artists. Why is that a good thing? Why should an artist be compensated beyond the first transaction? If
58.
by drugstorecowboy 5y ago
Couldn't you apply this logic to excuse doing any random thing? It might help so why not do it since we will potentially regret it in the future if we don't? I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you but by that logic we shoul
59.
by drugstorecowboy 5y ago
If that's true it's fascinating, could you suggest a resource I could use to learn more about this? If you know you are both just going to be punished and justice wasn't retaliative nor restorative, what would be the point of
60.
by drugstorecowboy 5y ago
I feel like these situations make the implicit assumption that violence is the ONLY possible way when it is in fact just the easiest and fastest way, with very mixed and inconsistent results. In the given situation wouldn't the obvious

More ›