drran

68 ms·

661.
by drran 5y ago
Hey, officer, send this guy to do drone job manually.
662.
by drran 5y ago
I use Pidgin as client for Telegram. I use Pidgin since ICQ.
663.
by drran 5y ago
DomTerm and xterm.js are terminals for web.
664.
by drran 5y ago
LISP.
665.
by drran 5y ago
If you read it and understood it, can you show us how to apply this formula to the warp drive, please? I cannot ask Einstein, obviously.
666.
by drran 5y ago
1) It's formula for time dilution. It's not applicable for a warp drive, because Alice will be shielded from relativistic effects, so no time dilution will occur. Alice's space will be dragged at speed > c, but Alice will
667.
by drran 5y ago
1) It's not applicable for this kind of drive. Isn't? 2) It's an unsolved problem, which waits for a correct solution. 3) Next time, please read what you are posting, please.
668.
by drran 5y ago
> Being able to send messages faster than the speed of light grants the ability to send messages to yourself in the past. No, it doesn't. Even if we will be able to communicate instantly (0 delay = infinite faster than speed of lig
669.
by drran 5y ago
Moreover, gravitational waves are affecting speed of light, while EM waves are not affecting gravitation, so speed of gravitational waves is fundamental, while speed of light is not.
670.
by drran 5y ago
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain... In men, high levels of endogenous testosterone (T) seem to encourage behavior intended to dominate – to enhance one's status over – other people
671.
by drran 5y ago
Just record video of your screen, with your hands, and record movements of your mouse. It's enough to reproduce movements, measure reaction, and match them with game replay.
672.
by drran 5y ago
No, it's not. Readability assumes that code is easy to read and easy to understand. This code is easy to read for those, who understood the algorithm already, but is hard to read for those who has no understanding. It's the famo
673.
by drran 5y ago
They are no more obtuse than one letter options for command line tools. The author of function just forgot to write a man page.
674.
by drran 5y ago
Unlike GPL, proprietary licenses are not viral. They never asked for fair exchange of code, so court cannot force that.
675.
by drran 5y ago
Of course, it's not a magic, because everything is written in clear text, but it works: > However, in this case, Donald writes, "with Cisco, years of trying to work through their predecessor's compliance problems didn&#x27
676.
by drran 5y ago
In Linux, we use `abrt` for that, but user need to review and submit bug report with stack trace manually, so nobody complains about that. Yep, it's very useful.
677.
by drran 5y ago
If you are looking for the smallest case, then look at Oracle vs Google multibillion debate about this function: private static void rangeCheck(int arrayLen, int fromIndex, int toIndex) { if (fromIndex > toIndex) throw
678.
by drran 5y ago
> So, without GPL, how would Oracle render RedHat useless with telemetry? I cannot understand your question. > And why didn't it prevent the Audacity drama? It does. See https://github.com/temporary-audacity/
679.
by drran 5y ago
1) If I and said did not collaborate, then it will not help me, or anyone else. 2) If said corp refuse to collaborate with me and will use my code for free instead, then it will not help me, or anyone else, except said corp. Why I should ca
680.
by drran 5y ago
Few cases are listed here: https://wiki.fsfe.org/Migrated/GPL%20Enforcement%20Cases .
681.
by drran 5y ago
GPL prevents this from happening by requiring your competitor to open the code under the same license. For example, Oracle tried to outcompete RedHat by cloning the RedHat Linux into Oracle Unbreakable Linux.
682.
by drran 5y ago
1) Your analogy is wrong, because none of the software licenses forces a user to have a license for his work. Moreover, a math book has strong copyright protection. You cannot just copy the math book and sell it as your own. GPL allows that
683.
by drran 5y ago
Copyright holder can do anything he wants with his code, so yes, John can rerererererelease his own code under different license. However, you cannot do that, even if the copyright holder told you something. He may change his mind tomorrow,
684.
by drran 5y ago
> Why is it unacceptable? Because, very often, we ARE users of our own software, so, we don't want the licensee of the code to forbid the licensor of the code his right to modify his own code on his own device.
685.
by drran 5y ago
Which is very useful feature for me, the author of GPL'ed code.
686.
by drran 5y ago
GPL protects the right to see the source of a binary distributed to you, so, in some cases, it enables reading of the code.
687.
by drran 5y ago
Your analogy looks alien to me. Can you show us the link between a human and a computer program? WTF is "biological neural network"? Can you quote a law?
688.
by drran 5y ago
This is not true. Many small but successful companies are released their code using AGPL3 license, so you can see and contribute to the code, but cannot compete with them using the same code. The typical business model is a paid hosting and
689.
by drran 5y ago
NeXT (now Apple) has this experience: > The C compiler in use at the time was GCC, which was released under the GPL. To avoid the restrictions of this code, NeXT provided its front end as a library that end users would link against GCC,
690.
by drran 5y ago
Here is an explanation of the law: https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/more-info.html#:~:text=Fa... . Effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work: Here, courts review whether, and to

More ›