drob

13 ms·

1. 121.▲
   by drob 13y ago

   Not to mention this does away with all the administrative overhead of the dozens of piecemeal welfare programs we have in the US. Rather than whitelisting narrow sets of allowed expenditures and making people prove that they're poor fo
2. 122.▲
   by drob 13y ago

   Ah, fantastic. The only thing missing from the global warming "debate" was a party that heavily benefits from a melted arctic.
3. 123.▲
   by drob 13y ago

   That's different. For most software and movies, people not reading legalese isn't the core of your business. You make money on people buying your DVD, not on gotchas buried in license agreements. (Or, at least, I hope.) JustFab is
4. 124.▲
   by drob 13y ago

   If you seem like you'd describe your customers as "suckers", I don't want anything to do with you or your business.
5. 125.▲
   by drob 13y ago

   But there's no value in closing the loop. If postgres circular replication works this way, then a -> b -> a works the same way as a -> b, so there's no new capability here.
6. 126.▲
   by drob 13y ago

   Cute: "Incidentally, this also makes it possible to set up 'cycles' where replication is going in a circle. Whether that's a feature or a bug depends on your perspective." Is there any context in which it would make