Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
drenvuk
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
61.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
How is mocking services impractical? You have to do it anyway for tests. How is having their source code impractical? You should have downloaded it anyway. The only one that might seem extreme is downloading the SO dbs. I have done this
62.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
1. Of course you need the internet if you're hitting an api but the docs will get you to the point you can test it yourself without internet access by mocking their services. 2. If you're using a new framework or plugin you should
63.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
A bit, yes.
64.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
This guy is blind to the possible styles and mindsets of other programmers. "Pair programming is the joy of working with an extra brain and another pair of eyes, where the key is to build a context where you two share the same goal in
65.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
Keep in mind that while Foundationdb has its place and it's really good at what it does it's ssd only. If you're running on HDDs for cheaper storage you're better off with something else.
66.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
Probably. $115k vs no fly list. What's worse?
67.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
At this point, is it worth it to turn it into a criminal case where you fight them for the cash? They're trying to keep the cash inside of civil rules. what happens if you physically refuse to let them have your items? Because they&
68.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
Rather than that I should've written, "we should use whatever abstraction makes the problem easiest to reason about". I have no preference for either fyi.
69.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
lmao, is this satire? We should be using whatever abstraction is easiest to reason about. Sometimes that's apeasing the primate brain with objects and things, sometimes it's shoving those things through a pipeline. Free yourself
70.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
Why haven't I heard about this before? This seems like cockpit but more.
71.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
I normally don't shill anything but I think it's worth it since it's free and there are no ads. Just Run. It's a couch to 5k app that starts from a minute or so of running (really jogging) to running a full 30 minutes.
72.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
I have a hunch that everyone who is against syntax highlighting is somewhat color blind.
73.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
Are you not talking about a class instance? shouldn't all of this initialization happen inside of the constructor? If we're talking only about static properties it seems more reasonable to me to freeze them upon definition or firs
74.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
That proposal is ugly. I'd rather just use: class Translation{ static get translations(){ return {blah: things}; } static englishWords(){ return Object.keys(this.translations);} } Since
75.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
thanks.
76.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
You put etc. which leads me to believe you know of more good blogs. Can you please list them?
77.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
Sorry for this, it doesn't add to the conversation but it's lose*. Not loose, lose.
78.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
I understand the response but I'm wondering why you don't have an adblocker. even on mobile on ios they exist.
79.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
This explanation only works when the bonuses are just as bad as this article.
80.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
Payment processors need to be regulated in a way to prevent this stuff from happening. This is financial censorship for legal activities.
81.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
They can rely on users reporting it. They are not obligated by law to do this.
82.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
>Option #1 doesn’t really breach the ‘sanctity of device ownership’ because it only occurs if you’ve enabled iCloud photos on the device. I'm done. You'll rationalize anything.
83.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
They've given you two options: 1. Encrypt everything in the cloud but upload the hashes of these items as well on the device. Also notify us so we can notify law enforcement if they're doing some illegal stuff. 2. Everything is u
84.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
>Well that's not an option on offer and even that has real tradeoffs - it would result in less CSAM getting detected. Maybe you think that's the acceptable tradeoff, but unless government legislatures also think so it doesn
85.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
I really don't understand how you're arguing as if you don't see the bigger picture. Is this is a subtle troll? They are now scanning on the device. Regardless of how limited it is in its current capabilities, those capabil
86.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
At this point the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Let's see if whoever is doing the arm twisting can force Apple onto a path where they don't get to do every single little thing that they want.
87.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
IANAL. It will probably argued that way at some point if this passes.
88.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
I believe it is a sensible bill. it limits its impact to companies that have access to 50,000,000 users or more so it should only curtail giants.
89.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
This article glosses over the biggest deal in the bill. Section 3 subsection d - INTEROPERABILITY A Covered Company that controls the operating system or operating system configuration on which its App Store operates shall allow and provide
90.
▲
by
drenvuk
5y ago
This is incredibly annoying. They're providing all of this information which says that this program that runs on our devices is incredibly safe if we're not bad people. That the people at Apple and then law enforcement don'
More ›