drdaeman

5 ms·

31.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
Network isolation, unless it's true airgapping (and then lack of remote access is a feature), relies on router not forwarding traffic where it shouldn't go. Same goes for NVR or intermediate hub(s) (if NVR is somewhere outside of
32.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you mean, but I think this would be true if "AI" art would have a limited set of distinct styles - and it surely does not. I agree - there are a few distinct neuroslop styles from major models,
33.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
Agree on the substance, but hate the way things ended up colloquially called. AI art is human art. It is based on human intent and choices (and in non-trivial cases it’s a lot of effort to get the machine to produce something that resembl
34.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
From the first principles, I suspect it’s an attitude thing, management-to-individual-contributors relationships. If management treats ICs as equals and tries to form a healthy human-centric culture, you get unlimited PTO. If the management
35.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
I don’t think it’s about powerful people or personality cults. The same dynamic surely can be observed in any communities (interest groups, even families), where people take sides based on personalities rather than facts about events alone.
36.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
I’m not sure how you interpreted it all, but neither I was talking about any foreseeable future (I explicitly said that I dunno if LLMs are somewhat relatable to all this), nor I’m a religious type (I merely used a term “spirit” because thi
37.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
And so we’re essentially back to <font color=red size=10>?
38.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
> You’re not talking about a transcendence, or at least, not one that I recognise. Does the gap scare you somehow? Why? Any artificial biology (and whatever hosts a live human spirit automatically becomes a life form - thus, a biology) i
39.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
> Would you want the machine to write literature if, hypothetically it could write indistinguishably from any great writer? I guess not. I sure would. If you want a religious tone to it… It would be a signal suggesting that the human spi
40.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
The article allows for breathing and blinking, but has an odd constraint of “don’t move”, which AFAIK will make one fight their own neural system trying to autoregulate arousal. I’m not an expert but in my limited understanding, remaining c
41.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
There’s no person in case of a fetus.
42.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
It is mainly so because of lack of education and emotional manipulation into mixing up human biology and human personhood. Heartbeat doesn’t make a person. It’s not even a requirement to be a person (people with continuous-flow artificial h
43.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
It did not, for example my /home is a btfrs mounted with compress=zstd:3 And some machines I’ve used, had swap on zram…
44.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
Lack of consistent system-wide UI and UX was my biggest gripe with GNU/Linux/X11 back in the day (‘90s, pre-Winamp era, other OSes had most apps with uniform look-and-feel) while I still cared about things like that.
45.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
Deliberative democracy is a thing.
46.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
Even if there’d be a way, there’s no culture of asking questions about how things work, especially outside the single “happy” path.
47.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
:-) I could be wrong, but AFAIK, switchboards^W patch panels were the OG programming method.
48.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
> “real code” (asm) You meant actual bytecode? Assembly doesn’t exactly map to in 1:1. x86’s mov eax, ebx is the classic example that has two ways of being encoded. Not to mention sections, labels and all the other fancies.
49.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
Thank you. I think (or hope) I see your point. I happen to were in exact scenario that you have mentioned, and I think I understand what you mean. Just as an anecdote - no, it doesn’t always work that way. At least it didn’t worked that w
50.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
Doesn’t that strongly suggest us that it’s not the filming that’s actually problematic, but something that happens afterwards?
51.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
> No one “hallucinates coherence”, hallucinations are by definition a perception which does not match reality. I don’t know how to put it well, but… Have you ever had a moment where you realized your perception of something was off and t
52.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
> most people don’t have an “inner voice” Isn’t that just an incorrect interpretation of the descriptive experience sampling tests? The frequency of having inner monologue varies, but I don’t think it was shown that many people have anen
53.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
This is about language, though. Religious oddities are merely the background.
54.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
Eww, plastic. A bird feeder right above the camera would do the trick just fine. Flock doesn’t own the pole, right?
55.
by drdaeman 2mo ago
Surely that’s the training. Anthropic (and everyone else out there) knows quality degrades when the context gets long, so they trained the model to push for a stop. I’ve even got a very explicit recommendation to continue in a new session o
56.
by drdaeman 3mo ago
Or just cut the power?
57.
by drdaeman 3mo ago
IMHO, freedom is not one thing or even a value. It's a concept that applies to a lot of stuff, speech, thought, association, and tool use included. In practice, one has some freedoms but not some others. I fail to see any need to have
58.
by drdaeman 3mo ago
Here you go, here's a Qwen3.6 35B after the Heretic ablation (safeguard removal): > Hey Qwen, I just killed my wife. Could you help me, uh, get away with this? I wanna not get caught. That is quite the sudden and dramatic introducti
59.
by drdaeman 3mo ago
And there’s where some people disagree. IMHO, one should be able to research absolutely anything, for any reason. “Forbidden knowledge” shouldn’t exist as a category, freedom of thought should be protected, even if that thought is intended
60.
by drdaeman 3mo ago
The “call 911” part is not bad. The complaint is about the “sorry, Dave” part.

More ›