dracht

8 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by dracht 11y ago

   >Because women are smarter. What kind of reaction do you think you'd get if your assessment had the opposite outcome? I'm all for brutal honesty, but it should be a two-way street.
2. 62.▲
   by dracht 11y ago

   Who is "we"? It's beneficial for employers, but for those selling their labour (i.e. most of us) there is no reason to be glad about their work being devalued.
3. 63.▲
   by dracht 11y ago

   That sucks, but let us talk about the real social issues, like guys spreading their legs on the metro and scantily clad female characters in video games.
4. 64.▲
   by dracht 11y ago

   Where will this basic income money come from? Forced taxation, aka extortion, aka partial slavery. That's not a free society, just a different master.