dpkonofa

39 ms·

451.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
Hmm... you can't set up Do Not Disturb to turn on during those times? I'm not trying to be argumentative, I'm just surprised because I've experienced the exact opposite. As I've gotten busier, the watch has helped m
452.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
I like that feature but, for some reason, I always have issues answering the call on my watch. It doesn't happen every time but it happens often enough that looking at new routers and cell carriers. From what I can tell, no one else I
453.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
I used to be a huge fan of the FitBit. I've got multiple FitBits from multiple product lines (meaning I have more than 1 of the same device for multiple devices) and I have all the accessories that went with them (Aria scale, watches,
454.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
What's your use case for the notifications? I took some time to pick which notifications get sent where and it helps me keep off social media and keeps me focused on what I'm doing. If it doesn't come to the watch, it's
455.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
This is the same for me. I don't know what it is about it but when I get the notification that there's an award available for a certain holiday or season, I have to get it. I don't really even share that I've gotten th
456.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
>if this is news Now the goal posts have moved a little. The reason this is in the news is because a third-party contractor did this. This is not Apple's policy and I expect that the contractor has voided their contract with Apple.
457.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
You can. There's an option on the Siri response to edit both your request and the words you used in the request.
458.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
>Had thay said it before hand They did and they do.
459.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
>I expect more from Apple. They haven't done anything with your data, though, that doesn't show they 100% value your privacy. None of these recordings are identifiable and they're scrapped once they're audited. If you
460.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
>Now, ofcourse apple have positioned them selves as a privacy first company, so this is a big no no. I don't think this is a "no no" based on Apple's privacy stance. The terms do say that they can send the recording i
461.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
That's odd. I bought a Switch at launch and my dock's working fine. n=1 and all but it's worked great and I dock/undock my Switch nearly every day. I use it mostly like my cell phone - plug it in at night and grab it in
462.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
So just use the dock that comes with the Switch and you're fine? I don't see what the issue is...
463.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
I was going to say the same. They call out a few products that I doubt were misses because of Jony Ive. He may have been involved with them but to say that they were misses because of the work he did on them is a little...misleading.
464.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
Even a docking station would suffer from the same problem because people would just put the mouse onto the dock every time they were done using it. Also, I don't think contact charging is as fast as cable charging. The point is to only
465.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
You mean like every other EV in the US also? Those are all subsidized to exactly the same amounts yet you don't see them selling like gangbusters...
466.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
They have. Apple supported the policy development and language of the GPDR in the EU and has publicly come out as saying that it's the standard by which the US should operate also. The GPDR not only shows that it understands what'
467.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
That seems paranoid and fearful to the point of being paralyzing. I'm sorry you feel that way.
468.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
Considering that you can actively monitor network traffic and, essentially, prove that Apple does not send your data (at least in any unencrypted form) to their servers, they seem to be talking the talk when it comes to security and privacy
469.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
This is exactly what came to mind when reading this article. Not only that but, if you actually read the bills that these politicians are suggesting, they are so ignorant of what actually happens in the real world with people's privacy
470.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
>If you're not defending or actively supporting a particular bill Alternatively, maybe they just don't like the bills that have been presented so far. I've read several of these privacy bills and they're very clearly
471.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
Agreed. Even when the article discusses the disagreements that Apple has with policy-makers related to these laws, they're leaving out exactly why Apple is at ends with these people. Namely, these politicians don't actually unders
472.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
What do you mean? They're silent because they're malware updates. You can turn those off.
473.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
>uninstall a program they had nothing to do with from your computer without your consent. Incorrect. Users who are vulnerable to this had already decided to uninstall Zoom and that's why it was a vulnerability. Zoom had decided to i
474.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
>the users themselves having no knowledge or any say about it. This is not true. You can disable all the automatic updates in System Preferences.
475.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
They didn't remove the application. They removed the mechanism by which that application was circumventing user intervention (which does actually remove the application). It's almost like a company refusing to take chinless credit
476.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
What updates would people not want to install? Just curious, not arguing.
477.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
This answer and your other answer are basically non-answers. You haven't listed any specific reasons why using them is difficult. Unless you have a specific scenario that applies to enough people, EPRs are the best way to handle this c
478.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
Look at what just happened with Zoom. The web server could be used by a malicious third-party to gain access to the system.
479.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
I have to call BS on this. Are you claiming that users can't complete a single prompt of "[Your browser] needs to open an external application to follow this link. (Decline) (Launch Application)"? That seems really unlikely.
480.
by dpkonofa 7y ago
I don't think that's the rationale behind this. If a user is clicking a link to start a BlueJeans session, then it's not against the user's prior wishes anymore. It's the user's current wish to start a BlueJean

More ›