Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dozzie
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
36 ms
·
331.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
Ah yes, the thing we had in shell, Perl, and Ruby since forever, and that was never a very good idea.
332.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
Step one: take a good book and castrate it from all the important (read: difficult) parts, replacing them with shooting bad guys^Wbugs left and right. Step two: make a minor female character the busty main prize for the hero.
333.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
Again a banana attached to a gorilla and a whole jungle. Why can't we have a dashboard that just displays whatever is in its configured data store, and a data store filled with whatever is collected about the environment? It's alw
334.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
Start with learning cryptography systematically . No, just reading about symmetric encryption and hash functions doesn't cut it.
335.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
>> I would normally define 'correctness' to include rigorous mathematical proofs. > Do you have an example of a language that does what you're looking for? You mean, like SPARK? > On the proof side, Rust's bu
336.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
> There's such a divide between network engineers and everyone else, Only between network engineers and programmers. Sysadmins are not that far from netadmins, and they have no such problems. > maybe because most network knowledg
337.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
Well, you have experienced first hand that the Docker's idea that people working with network should not need to understand network is dumb. Start with old and venerable LARTC (Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO). TCP&#
338.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
Why do you think you need CI for small projects? Sane build scripts should be enough.
339.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
> what I am saying is that "Don't roll your own crypto" mono-culture makes impossible for people to grasp the basics of crypto. It's not. People not wanting to learn cryptography systematically make impossible for t
340.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
Congratulations, you have found the reason behind the things called "oracles".
341.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
> Having a background as a journalist, this was shocking for me. In other words: having a background as a journalist, he shocked you? Do you see where your "background as a journalist" failed miserably?
342.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
Why would bitcoin collapse a Nobel laureate?
343.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
So a digital interface that is displayed on a screen of a desktop is "UX", but the very same digital interface that is displayed on a touchscreen attached to industrial machine is suddenly a totally different field "ergonomic
344.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
You do realize that this "UX" thing was for decades called "ergonomics" and had a large body of research behind, do you?
345.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
Yeah, congratulations. You have discovered what we, sysadmins, have had for years: logging to remote syslog and reporting in those logs correlation information, akin to queue IDs in e-mail systems.
346.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
> I say FUD because I see helpful blog posts promoting new tools and software when they should be promoting techniques. Please do not try to redefine the meaning of an existing term. "FUD" already has its well-known meaning, di
347.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
Several things, usually for sysadmins. RPC daemon whose configuration is procedures to expose. Log parsing daemon. A small toolbox for building monitoring systems. RRD browser/plotter.
348.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
Take something you can read there, something not directly related to the interview. If you happen to have a little break, it's a good way to refresh your energy. Take a notebook to make notes during the interview. Make a TODO list for
349.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
Why in Python ?
350.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
There is a simple solution, though it's quite laborous: create something that you're actually proud of and you know is robust, well-written, and documented.
351.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
Yeah, step one: learn Erlang's debugging facilities.
352.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
> I don't dislike recruiters at all. In principle, I agree. Execution is vastly different, though. Recruiters I've met up to now are mostly bunch of people not understanding the thing they recruit for in the slightest, so they
353.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
So, basically, take a document timestamping service that is decentralized, and throw away this one and only progressive feature of blockchain by making it have something that resembles central authority. It doesn't sound like the team
354.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
It was designed to be as magical as possible, so that programmers that work with network don't need to learn how to configure networking (which is a dumb idea on its own). I don't think there's a good description anywhere.
355.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
> it's that most cities no longer function properly for the carless I think the world outside USA would want a word with you about that "most cities" part.
356.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
How so? Over SSL? (Note that you should never call anything requiring authentication/authorization over plain HTTP.)
357.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
> Title: Why are there so few female engineers? > [...] Here, two pioneering female engineers at Oxford University explain what drives them. So it's not as much an article as a kind of incomplete interview that doesn't addre
358.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
> OTOH, "int (* x)(char * )[]" is something you can call with a string and then index into to get an int. ... would be something you can call if it was a correct declaration. I don't think it's valid, and certainly G
359.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
> (1) The kernel can predict which pages the user will "almost never touch." > I disagree with (1). [...] The kernel does not have sufficiently detailed knowledge of the process's purpose or access patterns. You're
360.
▲
by
dozzie
9y ago
Probably like the rest of the world is a quite big place, you know. I wouldn't bet a beer on Bay Area being a majority here.
More ›