Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
downer
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
91.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
That's why I suggested using FreeNX and a bootable flash drive, then you DO have all the power on the back-end and aren't limited to a browser on the front end.
92.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
> Why can't I do it? Ah, because your brain is rebelling against having to deform itself to fit someone else's mode of thinking. Most software other people have written is full of WTFs even in just setting it up. I had this problem wi
93.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
I CAN HAS CO-FOUNDER?
94.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
Write an AI. [General Solution, 10 points.] Then it can help you with anything, or do the rest of the work for you while you sleep.
95.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
All the objectors are completely missing the point that's being brilliantly illustrated by this tongue-in-cheek site: MAKE SOMETHING PEOPLE WANT. There are huge untapped markets because most web 2.0 sites are very, very niche, with a huge
96.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
That's not very smart.
97.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
" We found developmental traces of pre-school knowledge in biology professors. The professors acted like children even though they've had at least 20 years to overcome their early confusions." Details!
98.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
What is a "Rockstar Developer"?
99.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
> "AJAX" is just one stupid function call XMLHttpRequest() is one function call. AJAX in this context implies a rather serious JavaScript application. I note you didn't respond to the FreeNX alternate idea. Apparently there's alread
100.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
The obvious correct solution is to get everyone off of IE altogether.
101.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
> I think the answer is "you can't". That's what I said a few posts ago. > You can't claim to have a solution for the problem if it only works for a > fixed input, and if the solution itself would be different for different &#
102.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
This has nothing to do with it being statically sized or variably sized. You have to know what size it is when you are going to reverse it. The solution presented works as long as the programmer knows what the size is. If you want to posi
103.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
I recall this being lambasted on Reddit a while back: http://programming.reddit.com/info/2piup/comments
104.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
> I envy the LAMP guys, not because of the technology which I think is slightly behind Microsft's [sic] (VS + C# + .NET) Ruby and Python and Lisp and all their frameworks and PostGres just aren't the same as those cutting-edge Micro
105.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
I wonder if a retargeted GTK library would allow you to run The Gimp as an AJAX application; either that or perhaps a Flash FreeNX client. Ulteo made OpenOffice work online: http://lifehacker.com/software/online-documents/use-openoffi...
106.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
Ah, but interrupting business for personal looks bad ; and the thing about (possibly most) women is they want you to have something that's more important than them. If you drop everything for them they won't respect you. So he did the r
107.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
Porn.
108.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
You don't; it's basically, "here's an array, now reverse it" (keep in mind a pointer is not an array). http://www.lysator.liu.se/faq/c-faq/c-2.html The general point is that interviews of this type are counterproductive.
109.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
I meant $25m as a dollar figure is a tiny amount when compared to today's acquisition prices (which may follow Angel-only investing) and considering how big a chunk of Google they got for it. Perhaps that's hindsight, but even at the time
110.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
It does work, you do the 3-step XOR with a[0] and a[last], then a[1] and a[last-1], etc. The 3-step XOR from the OP swaps the data. Here it is with a 4-element array, a[0] through a[3]: a=[100,200,300,400] a[0] ^= a[3] a[3] ^= a[0]
111.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
Of course, it's your formative years.
112.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
"Unless a man enters upon the vocation intended for him by nature, and best suited to his peculiar genius, he cannot succeed." How am I gonna get paid to surf porn :(
113.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
... and where you are in the array, hence the temp variable. Write it out to see. So it still doesn't work, even if you use a function to "cheat" and get a "free" pointer (which, by the way, wasn't what the task said).
114.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
Was Digg ever good? Not to mention, unlike Reddit, they weren't neutral. They would try to squelch certain stories and ban users. They shut down all submissions after their attempted squelching of the HD-DVD hex key didn't work. They b
115.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
But who says it's a crackpot theory? Mainstream media, owned by... I think more generally this is exposing the problem with majority rule, whose time should come to an end anyway. What if there IS a legitimate >50% Idiocracy? Just lo
116.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
"Somewhat" likely? Here's how normal paper ballots work: After the polls officially close, they count them up, in full view of whatever members of the public care to observe. In hotly-contested areas, this will usually include members of
117.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
Doing p++, len-- uses two temporary variables.
118.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
Content filtering is completely different from book-cover filtering.
119.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
> like "How do your reverse an array without a temporary variable?" You hard-code it using XOR. Note you can't even do a for-loop, as that's using an extra variable. Of course hand-unrolling a loop takes extra memory because it's so
120.
▲
by
downer
19y ago
This is kind of the point, as most start-ups are mostly technical people who only appoint one of themselves as CEO because somebody has to be. It's not a question of ability but of desire; lack of experience is obviously to be expected,
More ›