dowager_dan99

18 ms·

241.
by dowager_dan99 2y ago
You don't really need a distribution to measure tasks that are binary in nature though, why bother with a Likert scale when you can just use a yes/no checklist? I suspect there's also a high correlation between the jobs/
242.
by dowager_dan99 2y ago
if your scale doesn't have the atomic values at the top end to differentiate the data it's not a normal, it's Pareto or Zipf or some other power law.
243.
by dowager_dan99 2y ago
This is at best naive, and reads pretty smug and self-satisfied. You likely still have a military, and policing isn't really about the weapons a cop carries. Ironically less deadly weapons can encourage more liberal use, so maybe you c
244.
by dowager_dan99 2y ago
this is a good example of how individuals are fine to do things for the public good when they are consequential or at least compatible with the things in their best interest. We're willing to self sacrifice only so (and not very) far,
245.
by dowager_dan99 2y ago
So you took the time to write a commentary about how the parent wasn't worthy of your counterpoints, but no actual rebuttal. That sort of low-effort / high opinion / no value / zero impact comment (and this post too) is
246.
by dowager_dan99 2y ago
docker compose doesn't need to be overly complex though; I think if it starts to feel that way you're likely doing it wrong(tm). K8s IS very complex, and likely overkill but exactly what you should do if you need it in production.
247.
by dowager_dan99 2y ago
even with electronics. Apple didn't achieve their dominance because of their software - any of the times. The physical products were continually refined and the software used as a lever to help them perfect the experience. When they fo
248.
by dowager_dan99 2y ago
if you replace "investment" with "speculation" I agree
249.
by dowager_dan99 2y ago
Even in the literal sense of "owning" you don't need a majority, but yes - one share does have fractional power. I voted my 1000/<a very big number> just recently.
250.
by dowager_dan99 2y ago
the entire ETF industry is based on either spending the distributions or reinvesting them, depending on which side of the curve your age lands on, so it's pretty much spending the index.
251.
by dowager_dan99 2y ago
I'm now a soft-hands, academic-type but worked in a metal fabrication shop all through my schooling. Your read is very accurate. I still get her perspective though, because even as a male, white, straight, married guy in a shop full of
252.
by dowager_dan99 2y ago
"Charitable interpretation" it seems like that is what's missing from the internet (and world) today. Extreme perspectives and no interpersonal relationships == not trust, no willingness to learn.
253.
by dowager_dan99 2y ago
well they probably need at least 20 for wordle
254.
by dowager_dan99 2y ago
It's a very good CMS, with lots of cool, bespoke features you don't typically get, but functionally it is still mostly a CMS.
255.
by dowager_dan99 2y ago
I don't get this read, or your analogy really. Seems more like "former bible editor here; the author of the psalm about bible editor unions is also a member of a bible editor's union, so is probably not super anti-union. They
256.
by dowager_dan99 2y ago
is this really true? With one side we can at least get something done and move on with are lives. Two extreme perspectives does not lead to finding a friendly middle ground, it just leaves us locked in a painful & unpleasant stasis.
257.
by dowager_dan99 2y ago
This describes newspaper 101... from 20+ years ago. Now it's all "the reaction to the reaction to the most salacious and inflammatory interpretation"
258.
by dowager_dan99 2y ago
How is this relevant? We expect newspapers to be balanced regardless. The issue here is reporting from someone, <anyone>, at arm's length.