Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dowager_dan99
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
91.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
these are the first people to go in times of trouble or politics, which is a real shame because the bulk of work in almost all companies is done by solid, experienced workers, not rockstar hierarchy climbers
92.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
look for smaller, private companies. They'll require you to do a broader range of tasks, but there's no progression because there's no hierarchy or formal management. Most of the devs I know who've been in the same role
93.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
I think you've answered the question. It's really easy to generate slop now. AI to build a standard front end, AI to generate content. It's like geocities again, but no labours of love; not much labour at all.
94.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
click "Open App" redirect to sign in page. close tab. This space is ridiculously crowded and the value-add of most of these services pretty 1. low and 2. identical. If you can't hook me I'm not going to bother with any f
95.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
>> if I know the precise year it is kinda hard to seek why don't you drag to get close enough and then use the buttons?
96.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
I really dislike almost everything Oracle and Larry Ellison, but he had an early-days adage "There are 2 jobs at Oracle: you're either building software or selling it". At a early-stage startup most people should be doing bot
97.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
This is how auto executives designed the Pontiac Aztek. How can you possibly become or develop new "architects" with this approach?
98.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
I'm a first-time Director at a SW company with a total org under me of ~30 people in 5 different subject areas. I struggle with what you highlight, but it's impossible for me to go deep in all these areas. MY boss is the CTO and h
99.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
This just sounds like having a point developer. The challenge is too many companies expect this without giving up a feature-dev headcount. Any work the get done aside from point is a bonus and unplanned.
100.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
The best development teams WANT this. They will readily take on the responsibility to get the autonomy. The problem is many companies give the former without the latter...
101.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
I believe you're referencing the Engineering Management principle of "share shit work evenly".
102.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
hand-off needs to be really carefully defined and managed efficiently. Client tickets rarely respect arbitrary calendars, and the context switching alone can be really expensive. The best I've seen is a primary/secondary setup whe
103.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
with the WASM work in DuckDB this is actually a great use-case. For so many workflows you can do everything in a local browser session.
104.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
It has great CSV and JSON processing so I find it's almost better thought of as an Excel-like tool vs. a database. Great for running quick analysis and exploratory work. Example: I need to do some reporting mock-ups on Jira data; DuckD
105.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
Supabase IMO sits in the middle of the curve between Firebase and PocketBase, not really the same use case as DuckDB & MotherDuck.
106.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
I've looked at quite a few options, and this one (the product of a single person) is a great base, and MIT licensed: https://github.com/caioricciuti/duck-ui If you want to support a real OS UI take a look.
107.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
I don't see this as the same thing. Deno is an OS product within a commercial enterprise. DuckDB is an OS project/org; MotherDuck is a for-profit company. They have tight integration and partnerships but were largely independent.
108.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
>> but it’s intention and effort which matters. I think I understand what you're saying, but this is a very dangerous generality. I think the HOW matters more than the intent.
109.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
10 years, not weeks.
110.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
it seems overly charitable to give Google, THE advertising company, the benefit of the doubt here when the biggest impact is it will now show way more advertising.
111.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
it's a good base level, but misses dynamic updates, custom rules and interactive element picker/blocker.
112.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
this seems realistic with consideration of a lot of previous tech advancements. We focus on the disruption, but meanwhile the efficiency improvements follow closely (and often more easily) on the coat-tails. We should definitely be looking
113.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
seeing your first YT ad in a decade is quite the shock!
114.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
also you'd think that the pushers of this agenda would get real-time updates to things like block lists metadata. God knows they do it themselves several times a day...
115.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
gone for some... many... most.
116.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
only gets updated when published and doesn't support custom rules or element picking :(
117.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
I have a similar situation, though for more personal, first-world problems. I used custom rules for things like YT shorts, Jira's giant bar for emoji-responses in comments, etc. I'm not sure there's a good substitute on Chrom
118.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
We don't need to do this directly, but any attempt is high stakes. Cuba armed itself by proxy and while it has had some form of "independence" at what cost?
119.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
let's not even open the conversation on Teams. The fact that so many businesses (including my employer) run their fundamental activities on such a piece of shit BLOWS MY MIND. I'm sure there's some cool tech and lots of smart
120.
▲
by
dowager_dan99
2y ago
I really have not seen anything material since windows 7 that would meet the bar of major improvement. Windows 7 with bug & security fixes, adding support for new hardware standards and SW developments, and feature evolution would be su
More ›