doovd

9 ms·

61.
by doovd 6y ago
Same here dude. Was sad when it turned out NOT to be the yellow flower!
62.
by doovd 6y ago
Can't tell if this is sarcasm but this is, on balance of probabilities, not true.
63.
by doovd 6y ago
Ye idk what the guy above you was trying to say TBH
64.
by doovd 6y ago
You will tolerate deaths until it becomes a loved one or yourself. At that point you'll realise that all you need to do is stop being an idiot and understand that with some restrictions we can significantly reduce deaths and at some po
65.
by doovd 6y ago
Can't beleive they actually had "PIN IDENTIFICATION NUMBER" written on the display in the movie itself
66.
by doovd 6y ago
Very interesting, thank you!
67.
by doovd 6y ago
> they didn't quite trust their missiles not to launch straight up and come back down on the ship. This sounds like some ridiculous cold war propaganda, source?
68.
by doovd 6y ago
You are right to be suspicious. This story has so many holes.
69.
by doovd 6y ago
"The lower class" lol. Could you not phrase that better?
70.
by doovd 6y ago
You are asking why an already infected person who receives the vaccine may still be able to spread it? The virus is still able to spread while the body fights it. In fact I'm not even sure there is a significant advantage of giving the
71.
by doovd 6y ago
Nice, he can get a shed in South Kensington now. Nice and close to Imperial.
72.
by doovd 6y ago
Indeed, there's nothing O(1) about this and is precisely still O(n) ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
73.
by doovd 6y ago
Kelly Loeffler clearly does hft part-time
74.
by doovd 6y ago
The formula is also buried in a simple circle.
75.
by doovd 7y ago
You're missing the point - having these "essentials" shouldn't cost 350
76.
by doovd 7y ago
Oh yeah, 40k engineers, apologies
77.
by doovd 7y ago
250,000 engineers at JPMorgan.
78.
by doovd 7y ago
More like "let's just test in Prod"
79.
by doovd 7y ago
Woooosh...
80.
by doovd 8y ago
Yes it is. Placing orders you don't intend to be executed is spoofing. From the OP: "faked a bunch of activity"
81.
by doovd 8y ago
This is called spoofing and is illegal.
82.
by doovd 8y ago
Fair enough
83.
by doovd 8y ago
This sounds like bs to me. There is a significant number of users with profile photos that don't contain a face and this is the first time I'm hearing this...
84.
by doovd 8y ago
> This is an extremely flawed initial assumption. There is no requirement for chance to be centered around zero. Consider rolling a dice: sometimes you'll get more than the mean, sometimes less, but you'll never roll a negative