Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dooglius
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
72 ms
·
931.
▲
by
dooglius
7y ago
It's a genuine question, I don't have an argument for impossibility or anything, I just don't see how revocation could practically be done. In scenario A, Joe Schmo buys a camera, happens upon a powerful politician in a compr
932.
▲
by
dooglius
7y ago
How would you know when to revoke a key?
933.
▲
by
dooglius
7y ago
Because the sort of actors who would try to forge videos are precisely the sort of actors who would have such advanced technology. The secure enclave on an iphone protects against say someone trying to convert a stolen phone into a stolen i
934.
▲
by
dooglius
7y ago
> unforgeable key internal to their hardware, like we have with PGP / GPG PGP involves a private key, and if you have the private key you can "forge" any message. If you put the key in hardware, it can be read by an advers
935.
▲
by
dooglius
7y ago
Do your own backups on physical drives you own of anything truly irreplaceable
936.
▲
by
dooglius
7y ago
I don't know much about GPGPU-land, but all of the difficulties I foresee have to do with multiprocessing/sharing/context switching... my guess is that only one logical program can use the scratchpad at a time?
937.
▲
by
dooglius
7y ago
Moving to e.g. shared scratchpad memory would be a major paradigm shift, you'd have to do a lot of coordination between CPU vendors, OS/kernel developers, high-performance library writeslrs, etc to make it happen.
938.
▲
by
dooglius
7y ago
Does this effectively kill the ability for services to have sign-up promo codes?
939.
▲
by
dooglius
7y ago
If it's possible to desire things without happiness, what is the evolutionary rationale for happiness at all? Maybe what we call "happiness" is only one type of positive feedback among many of which we might be less aware.
940.
▲
by
dooglius
7y ago
Because it's highly relevant to the article/topic?
941.
▲
by
dooglius
7y ago
Is there any reason to disbelieve it? It seems like a reasonable thing to try.
942.
▲
by
dooglius
7y ago
> ungoogled-chromium retains the default Chromium experience as closely as possible It sounds like they would also be removing ad-blocking then
943.
▲
by
dooglius
7y ago
No, it means drastically reduce the population size; the implementation of this is orthogonal to the point.
944.
▲
by
dooglius
7y ago
Everything you describe could exist as a paid service, and I suspect would be much higher quality that way.
945.
▲
by
dooglius
7y ago
>But no robot could do what those people who landed on the moon did, let alone bring back hundreds of pounds of selected moon rocks Can you elaborate? Robots in 1969 perhaps couldn't, but bringing back rocks seems well within the ab
946.
▲
by
dooglius
7y ago
> the most popular onion service on the internet by a large margin is Facebook's How do you know? It shouldn't be possible to collect this sort of data.
947.
▲
by
dooglius
7y ago
>Git was intentionally designed to decentralise the process of software development, so that there was no single "blessed" repository I don't think this is true. It was developed by Torvalds to maintain the Linux kernel, w
948.
▲
by
dooglius
7y ago
Leap smearing makes #3 no longer false, but #1 and #2 remain false
949.
▲
by
dooglius
7y ago
Well, dedicated machines for each security domain for each customer, a lot of the time it's fine for many applications to be in the same security domain.
950.
▲
by
dooglius
7y ago
> He doesn't need to be found guilty of those offences for it to factor into sentencing That seems very wrong to me, the concept of "innocent until proven guilty" should extend to sentencing
951.
▲
by
dooglius
8y ago
This sounds pretty similar to what goes on now, except that the channel processor sits on the other side of the (e.g.) PCIe connector.
952.
▲
by
dooglius
8y ago
Health is neither boolean nor one-dimensional, but we can still say an allergy to nuts is less healthy than not. The same can be said for autism.
953.
▲
by
dooglius
8y ago
Google's definition of "identity" definitely does not capture the word as I understand it, and as I believe the GP was using it.
954.
▲
by
dooglius
8y ago
Well, I think one issue is that evolution acts on base-pair mutations and not traits. So (to wildly make a possibility up) suppose that mutations X, Y, and Z are each individually beneficial, but having all of them at once gives you autism.
955.
▲
by
dooglius
8y ago
I agree with your general point, but there are very clearly people who would choose to remain autistic, given the opportunity.
956.
▲
by
dooglius
8y ago
I remember when my University copied a couple of these, I decided to go the full mile on the one where you exploit buffer overflow. I got myself a remote connection via execve, and was going to mess around, but soon realized I could also se
957.
▲
by
dooglius
8y ago
The "extreme portability" he's talking about is portability of projects to compilers and libc implementations that behave badly, possibly in standards-violating ways like this.
958.
▲
by
dooglius
8y ago
That works fine when an application just wants to protect a private key in memory. But if you want to build, say, an application where a user enters via keyboard information that you want to protect from another application, you have to wor
959.
▲
by
dooglius
8y ago
One issue I see here is that time protection would need to extend to anything shared, not just CPU micro-architecture. For instance, if a hard drive has a DRAM-based cache, that could be used as a timing channel, and the complexity of flash
960.
▲
by
dooglius
8y ago
How is what you're talking about different from what the article describes?
More ›