dommer

7 ms·

31.
by dommer 11y ago
Fair point. I'm sure he did enjoy them as well as their content being of notable worth. I very much doubt the list, and the act of watching them is the whole lesson Spike is trying to impart. The lecture series would complete the educa
32.
by dommer 11y ago
I'm not sure I said the list was created in isolation. The list if most valuable when taking with the film school lectures. Without the lectures I cannot be expected to understand why Spike add a particular file into the list. Therefor
33.
by dommer 11y ago
The interruption of art is deceptive with nuance and esoteric means. Simply reading Shakespeare doesn't provide someone with understand of the proposed wisdom behind the text.
34.
by dommer 11y ago
I think that was my point. As a reader of this list, it is of passing interest. Take the course this list accompanies and I will receive much better context and substantially improve my understanding of their inclusion.
35.
by dommer 11y ago
You could say that. But the message—arguably—would be much better received with information.
36.
by dommer 11y ago
The list has little value in isolation. A brief context about why a particular film is in the list would be much more helpful. The audience can then understand why he included "controversial" directors like Gibson. The list on its
37.
by dommer 11y ago
Perhaps SH was secretly the seller.
38.
JetBRAINS moves to subscription payment model(jetbrains.com)
2 points by dommer 11y ago|0 comments
39.
by dommer 11y ago
I never said they didn't work hard.
40.
by dommer 11y ago
Yes this is a rant. However, the first point is a good one. 95% of the author's [limited sample] where recruiters earning a large amount of money for doing very little technically.
41.
by dommer 11y ago
Have you tried to negotiate without a recruiter? Many companies are now sharing some of the recruiter costs with the employee if they go direct. In London [currently] it is an employee market, so this is a simple and effective incentive.
42.
by dommer 11y ago
Despite its four fundamental principles this framework does not read well and I personally wouldn't recommend it. Class names with Ft or Bk or Rs or [add two letters] prefixes don't work for adoption and clarity of expression.
43.
by dommer 11y ago
you can look at this list of Java awesomeness. https://github.com/akullpp/awesome-java Or other awesome stuff at the parent project. https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome
44.
by dommer 11y ago
I'll skip the flame about WordPress developers as I don't know any, or, viewed their work. If you think building micro service architecture can be done without consideration I'm lost for words. The question–as I've been
45.
by dommer 11y ago
I'm unsure about that and I think it depends greatly on what is the goal. You can very easily do DI without Spring. (yes I know Spring is more than DI) As the project grows you can simple add Spring if brings 'real' value. Yo
46.
by dommer 11y ago
fair comment. I will add though, spring, or hibernate, or play, or [pick your framework here] will also require reading.
47.
by dommer 11y ago
My inclusion of these two reading resources were only meant as examples. The reader is still required to make their own mind up. I haven't suggested astronaut architecture; the question didn't indicate the size/scale/imp
48.
by dommer 11y ago
I would not start with technology stack and build around them. You look at your use cases and build out. Pick your frameworks and databases judiciously and as late as possible. Read: https://blog.8thlight.com/uncle-bob/