domlebo70

17 ms·

1. 151.▲
   by domlebo70 14y ago

   But all of those things are accomplished using plain Java (I.e. a Function1<InputType, OutputType>) and classes with static methods for objects etc. It's not done at a bytecode level. You can do everything you can do in Scala... in
2. 152.▲
   by domlebo70 14y ago

   Christ these are features we should be excited for? Give us proper lambdas. Give us pattern matching on types with extraction. Give us first class functions. Give us higher kinded generics so we can stop duplicating code. None of these thin
3. 153.▲
   by domlebo70 14y ago

   Yeah you're right.
4. 154.▲
   by domlebo70 14y ago

   This seems amazingly simple (on face value). Anyone else want to have a go at doing up a prototype as a weekend project?
5. 155.▲
   by domlebo70 14y ago

   Can't help this example could have been illustrated much more clearly in something other then CoffeeScript.
6. 156.▲
   by domlebo70 14y ago

   How do you know they are truly random, and not just simulated?
7. 157.▲
   by domlebo70 14y ago

   How often do you need to know what it's doing?
8. 158.▲
   by domlebo70 15y ago

   I agree. It sounds very cool, but we are exceptionally lazy.
9. 159.▲
   by domlebo70 15y ago

   What is it exactly...?
10. 160.▲
    by domlebo70 15y ago

    Jerkson works really well. Can convert JSON into case-classes really nicely and handles snake-types.
11. 161.▲
    by domlebo70 15y ago

    Would anyone be interested in something like this for Scala?
12. 162.▲
    by domlebo70 15y ago

    Looks great Andrew. Also thanks for helping me with my Cloth Simulation when I emailed you a year or two ago. Really appreciated that.