Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dogleash
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
181.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
Why? There’s already a plentiful list of disastrously wrong arrogant cocksure assholes. Still doesn’t stop people from thinking they’re the Steve Jobs flavor of arrogant cocksure asshole.
182.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
Calling out political opponents to defend every move of their party, so you can clown on them on the internet? Why bother?
183.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
"Not at all, because carbon fiber is better compression then tension. And that's what nobody understands. It's completely opposite of what everyone else says. Everyone's, oh, carbon fiber can't handle compression. T
184.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
I don't consider Agile bureaucrat positions leadership either. At best they're clerical support and training. In practice they can become officious ticket minders.
185.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
>You’re Going To Mess Stuff Up. Repeatedly. [...] Nobody expects you to have all the answers. [...] You’re not expected to be perfect. [...] Messing up is part of the job. What matters more is how you respond. Own your mistakes. Say the
186.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
I didn't downvote, but you started out sharing credentials that aren't management and then recounted standard platitudes about collaboration and some personal experience with zero transferable utility. And you posted that in resp
187.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
> "Oh no, my collaborative maintenance requires both collaboration and maintenance" chef's kiss This is replacing one of the memes on my whiteboard rn
188.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
I like the article, but there's a simpler underlying problem. Are people calling meetings to yap, or with clear and concise goals? Yappers do not understand the difference because their meetings are not bereft of articulable utility.
189.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
Being on the sharp edge of professional "do you want what you're asking for, or what I assume you want?" misunderstandings, you learn that it breaks in both directions often enough that sometimes not being pedantic up front i
190.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
>We can start contributing meaningfully from day one, learning what we need as we go. Can you though? Or is just not bad enough for your coworkers to bother telling you how bad it is? I use AIs daily. But that doesn't mean I don
191.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
I wonder how much it's changing the learning curve vs just making the experience more comfortable. >For someone who spent a decade as a “Ruby developer,” becoming a multi-language developer in less than a year feels revolutionary. R
192.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
I'd call this a business failing to simulate humanity, but it reminds me of one time I went jewelry shopping and the salesperson started explaining the different vibes conducted by the various stones. We need more roasts like this. We
193.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
Depends on how you slice it. If you focus only on data with high-uptime requirements, no probably not 50 TB. If you include low-uptime requirement but low-replaceability stuff like all the products' mechanical, electrical and software
194.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
edit: lol wut? The more I think about this the less it makes sense. The stigma of suicide is from the societal attitude that it's wrong and you should never do it. Using a verb isn't the bit that tells everyone it is wrong. If y
195.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
>You guys remember how 5+ years ago, an headline like this on HN would invariably prompt cries from the Americans I remember it. I'm pretty sure it's always just been the sellouts that work for anti-consumer tech companies (an
196.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
>Marketing experts say it's deceptive and unethical. So, standard marketing. Got it. What sets these videos apart is that they are impalatable to the status quo. You can describe why these videos are wrong and I'll agree wit
197.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
I agree with the premise about impermanence. But moving in the direction of "less ads, more genuine" is comical if not tied to the userbase completely falling out and most never coming back.
198.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
What a meaningless metric. Number of discrete robots is not a measurement of productivity, labor, task throughput or anything like that. Also the regular yada yada that non-robot automation offset people, non-automated tools also reduce nu
199.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
> everybody in academia is already aware of those problems (they are personally annoyed by them on a day-to-day basis). But the serious path to fixing them is not the buzz saw What is the serious path to fixing them? I don't think
200.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
> I'm sorry, why do we trust these guys again? Anyone who's attachment to gaming is low enough to let things like this effect their purchase decisions are already out. To the devs/pubs, those customers don't even exi
201.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
>What happened to pride or quality control or anything? Sounds like some dangerous cowboy coding wrongthink you've got going on over there.
202.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
> I haven't read about the outcomes, but I've always wondered what could happen if the DC area did the same. If the central office has any say over the location someone works, you get the phenomenon where the population of less
203.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
Even before AI the human element was being drown out. The neat internet thing was neat for a while because power hadn't worked out how to exploit it for their own ends. They have now, the genie doesn't go back in the bottle.
204.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
> And thats why you guys are working with computers and not people In my experience, even the comically over the top people-persons will be curt to chatty people if they're swamped with a task that doesn't revolve around verbal
205.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
*up-tight (too late to edit)
206.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
>people who think that using respectful discourse means no fun can be had will be gone It's not zero fun, but everyone understands it's a sign the vibes will be up-right, right? edit: that's not to say you don't want
207.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
> You'd expect hacker types (folks who hang out here on HN) The hacker types are the riff-raff the venture capital firm put up with on their website about making money with software.
208.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
Your attempt at an irritated jab is just the doomscroll addiction talking. Even for people that read news out of necessity, it can be curtailed down to only the relevant topics and the dryer outlets. I am one of those people, and the need
209.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
> I don’t think these humans have no soul They're sellouts and traitors. Then there are people who will take to pondering what it means to be a sellout in a disingenuous manner. They act like it takes a haughty philosophy club to s
210.
▲
by
dogleash
1y ago
> What would you do if friends and family and neighbors of yours for years, even decades, were pulled from their homes, places of work and worship, schools, etc? That has happened to me. Some of them did real heinous shit and deserve p
More ›