dogleash

5 ms·

61.
by dogleash 5mo ago
>if they start sticking their fingers into sites and determining whether the site's content is "appropriate" or whatever They already pick and choose. They have not decided to sit outside of it. Any claim about them not
62.
by dogleash 5mo ago
>I find this abuse horrific and you should speak to a therapist if you think this is okay. This is unintentionally hilarious. You're not arguing the moral point, you're using the same kind of reasoning that leads to gay conver
63.
by dogleash 5mo ago
> The “get an immediate agent answer then a human expert’s fast-follow” is I think a great idea for many domains So, like what already happens when my boss asks claude something and I have to pick up the pieces. Except now it's eve
64.
by dogleash 5mo ago
A: "The vibe at my favorite bar has changed" B: "You are still perfectly capable of having fun in life" I don't really get how B follows from A. B is true, but A wasn't implying not-B.
65.
by dogleash 5mo ago
> I don't think this way because I like to collaborate. Nice passive aggressive dig!
66.
by dogleash 6mo ago
Classic. How is it the case that every self-styled "empath" never is? I just don't know. Probably never will. I just don't have enough empathy to puzzle this one out.
67.
by dogleash 6mo ago
I can agree with you while still agreeing with parent poster that it's basically "git gud"-tier bullying. Very very few orators can successfully pull off "just fix your problems bro" as anything beyond a generic k
68.
by dogleash 6mo ago
>Otherwise we are forever dragging each other back in. I think turning a blind eye to our colleagues' work as if it's morally neutral is what keeps us in that pit.
69.
by dogleash 6mo ago
> But the author's writing style–punctuated with needless character assasinations I dare say those are the point rather than an side property of writing about quacks' downfalls. The media serves non-zero inoculation effect agai
70.
by dogleash 6mo ago
Your post is a masterclass in slippery middle manager yapping. They tried to punch up a deliverable and didn't even check that their new version served the purpose of that deliverable. If parent poster's story is even half true, I
71.
by dogleash 6mo ago
Yup, or that bad view of Broadcom is because of the price hikes. I had a meeting with IT where I was worried they were finally coming after my proxmox box they "didn't know about". Turns out they saw their vmware bill and sud
72.
by dogleash 6mo ago
>every time I push I discover they have no clue how networks work Listen here, if there is a networking technology or feature that I wasn't forced learn when I half-assed a SOHO router config in 2005, then it shouldn't exist at
73.
by dogleash 6mo ago
Yup. People learn parts of v4 through osmosis because it's the default. Then when networking topics come up, it's easier to keep going with stuff that looks familiar rather than un-learning assumptions. Why bother with the weird
74.
by dogleash 6mo ago
Reader's Digest: What pleases you more, applause or laughter? Tina Fey: Laughter. You can prompt applause with a sign. My friend, SNL writer Seth Meyers, coined the term clapter, which is when you do a political joke and people go,
75.
by dogleash 6mo ago
> "Make users pass a test on basic concepts like the distinction between necessary and sufficient conditions before they can tweet." If twitter ever became what he says he wants, he'd quit using it within a month. He alre
76.
by dogleash 6mo ago
Maybe the volume of AI content will finally get people to advocate for media awareness training, rather than the current strat of trying to scold platforms into only showing the manipulative content they side with.
77.
by dogleash 6mo ago
>This is going to catch some heat [...] It does seem like a roundabout way of saying "but what if full sending on AI didn't have downsides, tho?" Just phrased in a way that can put the onus on the other party with a perfec
78.
by dogleash 6mo ago
Do you think they think they're going to meaningfully effect Netflix's bottom line? Or are they just trying to chat online about the purchase decision topic at hand?
79.
by dogleash 7mo ago
>The identity crisis observation is the most accurate thing It's also a nasty tool used to dismiss criticism by tearing people down in work-friendly language. Software does employ a lot turds that it shouldn't. We been knowing
80.
by dogleash 7mo ago
> It is telling about what we prioritize in our society. No it's not. It's a measure of what people want accomplished, are least interested in doing themselves, and feel capable of reviewing enough to delegate to a known lair.
81.
by dogleash 7mo ago
Permission and timing gotchas in /tmp predate snap and systemd. It's why things like `mkstemp` exist. I remember cron jobs that did what systemd-tmpfiles-clean does before it existed. All unix daemons using /tmp run the ris
82.
by dogleash 7mo ago
> The arguments I've heard against it are almost all slippery-slope (e.g. "they're gonna do this first, and then add ID requirements next year, because that's what I fear will happen.") And the arguments for it d
83.
by dogleash 7mo ago
> By late 2024, FedRAMP reviewers concluded that they had little choice but to authorize the technology — not because their questions had been answered or their review was complete, but largely on the grounds that Microsoft’s product was
84.
by dogleash 7mo ago
> the core gameplay loops work just fine without it. Of course it's functional, it has to string people along for enough time to get them to start paying. That doesn't mean grinding a system tuned to get you hooked enough to gi
85.
by dogleash 7mo ago
These smell like the kind of metrics that cause someone to feel informed and then to miss the forest for the trees. The kind of data for a "data driven" decision maker who will just invent a narrative to explain the numbers, and
86.
by dogleash 7mo ago
>PMs coding unlocks a whole new category of work, mainly addressing the long tail of cool ideas/small optimisations that ordinarily would not be addressed So you get to cowboy code, but I don't. I see how it is.
87.
by dogleash 7mo ago
> Premium to be able to "Jump Ahead to parts other users think are valuable". This is Google's euphemism for building a SponsorBlock equivlient into youtube. It just sounds terrible if they come out and tell you that in ad
88.
by dogleash 7mo ago
> Maybe the people on charge have personally invested heavily in Kick? Twitch is owned by Amazon. AWS sells the streaming tech Twitch uses to Kick. Amazon would probably rather sell IVS to Kick than try and figure out how to make Twitch
89.
by dogleash 7mo ago
> my current job my boss has never told me not to do something. Getting the time to do it is another story I’m confused. The polite way to say no at work is to make it about not having time.
90.
by dogleash 7mo ago
> Just think about how easy it would be though Endlessly painful. Right? The defining characteristic is that everyone is using it, not that it's your personal ideal operating system. We have a few major players trying to create the

More ›