dogleash

42 ms·

631.
by dogleash 5y ago
>This whole article seems to be implying that the situation is some sort of moral failing of people who drink "natural wine" but if there's a problem here it's the underlying inequality, not the choice of wealthy peop
632.
by dogleash 5y ago
>They don't like being challenged by anything. "Challenging" is such a bullshit term. It implies there's something meaty for your brain to chew on, but 9/10 times it's a pretentious way to write off people
633.
by dogleash 5y ago
Alcohol's classification as a depressant refers to depression of neurotransmission, not the mental affliction known as depression.
634.
by dogleash 5y ago
How else do you sell "reporting" on something so mundane? Nobody's buying my book: "Social grouping in private life subcultures often pull members from their public life social groups" They're also not buying m
635.
by dogleash 5y ago
Yup. That's the vibe of facebook. Profit makes the hype believable to the point people can no longer distinguish hype from the concrete positives. There's also the salty ones who, in private, will admit they loathe the company b
636.
by dogleash 5y ago
>usable in plenty of non-systemd environments That's really unfortunate naming then. Any systemd-foo that "works on it's own" is (rightly) assumed to be tightly coupled to the rest of the systemd ecosystem.
637.
by dogleash 5y ago
Yep, I tapped out on netflix too. Never said anything about it to anyone that didn't live with me. Pretty quiet and mundane decision, more like a realization it just wasn't worth it anymore.
638.
by dogleash 5y ago
> We need new thinking to create something much better than what came before. In the last few years, different groups of people came to the same conclusion, and started working on the next generation of [foo]. For this new generation, [b
639.
by dogleash 5y ago
I think you could build a really good terminal if you had $23M to piss away. I strongly doubt you can create a good terminal if it also needs a business model that can recoup $23M.
640.
by dogleash 5y ago
pmuch this. My experience is specifically devices/MDDS, but Facebook style “We are not actually doing what we say we do publicly” [0] is one of the biggest sins possible. [0] https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-
641.
by dogleash 5y ago
> You do realize that the entire "ubiquiti sucks" mood on HN started with the publications of these (factually inaccurate) articles from Krebs? Their product direction changed and they're no longer my go-to. It appeared t
642.
by dogleash 5y ago
Why wouldn't you recommend a lawyer to someone who wasn't legally wronged, but feels they may have been? What's wrong with pointing someone to a professional consultation in this scenario?
643.
by dogleash 5y ago
>Public interest doesn’t automatically protect the release of private materials Did this fired guy release private materials, or dig through already-published materials for something relevant to his interests to highlight?
644.
by dogleash 5y ago
> These don't seem like the right steps With google’s communication skills, I still can’t fault OP.
645.
by dogleash 5y ago
It was a foreseeable inevitability that once SaaS took over from on-prem that the quality would degrade to what we were getting from on-prem. ...but if you said anything you were just interrupting people playing with their new toys. The shr
646.
by dogleash 5y ago
GitHub's feature churn is irrelevant to the comparison unless those features are used in parent poster's workflow.
647.
by dogleash 5y ago
Bing's pretty decent when you want to search the web for your query without Google attempting know what you're looking for better than you do.
648.
by dogleash 5y ago
>Apple definitely still have their soul Really? It's all so painful sterile. Even their attempts at deviating from that coldness feel like someone with a spreadsheet calculated they should increase the brand-safe fun quotient in se
649.
by dogleash 5y ago
Que? Isn't "don’t see how it’s a market fit" just startup speak for "it's not economically viable"? That would fall squarely into the category of design failures I was talking about. It's not like we don&
650.
by dogleash 5y ago
If they’re giving it away for free, that must mean there is a fatal flaw they could never design around and are confident nobody else will either. What’s the point then? At least tell us why it’s a dead end.
651.
by dogleash 5y ago
> I'm not entirely sure what you're asking for. It seems like you want a comprehensive list of what will and won't be allowed? No. I'd just prefer they don't lie in their marketing. Because it always gets walke
652.
by dogleash 5y ago
>It seems like maybe you just wanted to tee off on the idea of anybody, anywhere, implementing any sort of community standards? No, but thanks for the talking down to. I have no problem with them having limits, it's - at the very l
653.
by dogleash 5y ago
Yeah, this juxtaposition of "art" and "safe" is incredibly sus. We know they're going to have a line about what they'll host. Just say what it is and save yourself the headache later on.
654.
by dogleash 5y ago
They are. We get exactly one unit of information about #1, that they "complain[ed]". If we don't treat the assessments of #1 and #3 conversational prowess as tautological, there is no information to be had. Why isn't #1
655.
by dogleash 5y ago
>CISO - and IS overall - is actually much more people-focused than most realize. You'd think you're hacking away and/or find vulnerabilities all the time Finding vulnerabilities is just a specialized type of software QA th
656.
by dogleash 5y ago
I may have miss-communicated. I was saying "lawyers involved" is not a meaningful demarcation point about costs. How the two partners choose to use those lawyers is . For example, again, involving a lawyer to draft paperwork t
657.
by dogleash 5y ago
>everything is to be taken seriously (ie at face value) bc anything more than that would require agreement between those who disagree. That's backwards. Everything should be seen as profoundly not-serious, for precisely the same rea
658.
by dogleash 5y ago
>It means you get to decide not to care. Everyone gets to decide not to care. I'm in a marginalized group and temporarily suspending caring is the primary coping mechanism for the stress political fights in, around, and about the g
659.
by dogleash 5y ago
>If you didn't believe your views mattered, you wouldn't bother to post here. lol wut? Not parent poster, but I post here precisely because I know my views don't matter. This is idle chitchat with people in a similar lin
660.
by dogleash 5y ago
I don't get why "lawyers getting involved" is cast as such a big deal, either in the one partner's tweet or here. Like yeah, bringing in a lawyer can signal there's about to be a nasty fight, or if they're dr

More ›