dodu_

5 ms·

31.
by dodu_ 5mo ago
The work is mysterious and important.
32.
by dodu_ 5mo ago
> do they really understand what they did? ... I know you said you don't truly think that way, but to counter anyway since some people seem to legitimately hold this viewpoint: I take issue with the implication that not necessarily
33.
by dodu_ 5mo ago
I'd rather just be an actual schizophrenic at that point. It seems like less of a mental illness. Just be outside and present.
34.
by dodu_ 5mo ago
Maybe you're the exception and are actually doing it right and actually getting good results, but every time I have heard this, it has been an ignorance-is-bliss scenario where the person saying it is generating massive amounts of code
35.
by dodu_ 5mo ago
Then it seems you have a flawed concept of what constitutes the "good jobs".
36.
by dodu_ 5mo ago
>So maybe instead of demonizing the AI companies, we have a nuanced debate about this tech and propose solutions that our best for our society? These are not mutually exclusive. Calling out the demonic behavior of trying to coerce people
37.
by dodu_ 5mo ago
NOOO you have to use my shitpile of nested yaml with the same dependency sprawl cancer as modern javascript. You can't just upload a binary to your own servers and host it there you need to overthink everything and make an extremely si
38.
by dodu_ 5mo ago
Either I live with a restored faith in humanity, or I die and it's none of my concern.
39.
by dodu_ 6mo ago
Is that because kubernetes was the right fit from the beginning, or because the initial implementation was designed around kubernetes, which caused the migration to eventually end up taking that same shape?
40.
by dodu_ 6mo ago
What's a more reasonable general approach then? Let's say you're a team of 1-3 technical people building something as an MVP, but don't necessarily want to throw everything away and rewrite or re-architect if it gets tra
41.
by dodu_ 6mo ago
Fair enough. I appreciate the correction. I do still believe the main value proposition is large scale replacement and am unconvinced that most people driving AI adoption have these other more noble pursuits in mind with respect to AI. But
42.
by dodu_ 6mo ago
Correct me if I'm off base but these things (protein folding and drug discovery) both existed before AI, no? The implication of your comment seemed to be that this was going to be so much more than replacing people. But I fail to see h
43.
by dodu_ 6mo ago
Yes, but I'm not the one who introduced the "novel" constraint to the argument. e: Also I don't know that I'd strictly bucket these specific examples you gave as shittier versions, though I guess that's a matte
44.
by dodu_ 6mo ago
> do people really believe no novel things will be unlocked with this tech? Yes. It's a mostly shitty but very fast and relatively inexpensive replacement for things that already exist. Give your best example of something that is no
45.
by dodu_ 6mo ago
I can't say I'm a regular user but a while ago I stumbled upon another post about tiledwords while a loved one was in the hospital and it was a fun and welcome distraction to solve some of the puzzles together while stuck in an ot
46.
by dodu_ 6mo ago
jokesonthemiwasonlypretending.png
47.
by dodu_ 8mo ago
I'll take it over seemingly endless deluge of FUD-slop from the past 4 years that claims you better get ready for the AI takeover coming for all the jobs in just-long-enough of a timeline that nobody will remember to hold the author ac
48.
by dodu_ 8mo ago
>If there are well defined contracts for the software, and the software behaves correctly [...] But how would you ever know if this assumption is true?
49.
by dodu_ 8mo ago
What "repositioning" did you have to do?