Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
docmars
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
40 ms
·
451.
▲
by
docmars
5y ago
> What do you mean by this? In what circumstances do you think it's acceptable to make these comments? Excellent questions, and ones that are complicated to answer in any truly objective sense. The measuring stick I would maybe use
452.
▲
by
docmars
5y ago
Yup, precisely. In a nutshell, you're saying this goes both ways, and I think that's perfectly acceptable. I will caveat that I believe people who are opposed to the gender pronoun salad should also have the right to share that pu
453.
▲
by
docmars
5y ago
Nailed it. If someone required me to chant "Chocolate is god" whenever I enter their home, and my refusal to do so is a punishable / jailable offense, then that is a massive breach of my own rights to control my own speech. I
454.
▲
by
docmars
5y ago
(1) Two Chinese Boys Die Wearing Face Masks During Gym Class https://www.nydailynews.com/coronavirus/ny-coronavirus-two-c... (2) After Multiple Deaths, Officials Call for No Masks in Gym Class https://www.s
455.
▲
by
docmars
5y ago
Why not respond to the new information they presented instead of attacking by claiming "muh logical fallacy"? Your initial answer does not disprove or refute their more nuanced response, which very much does matter on this subject
456.
▲
by
docmars
5y ago
How is this a conspiracy theory? Why jump to that conclusion about this person's perfectly reasonable statement and hypothesis? Stories of children either passing out or dying because they were required to wear masks during track outdo
457.
▲
by
docmars
5y ago
Out of curiosity, what did you change after you experienced kidney stones? What was easy about it? What was difficult?
458.
▲
by
docmars
5y ago
>That's because most conservative politics is fundamentally opposed to the rights of any given minority group, pretty much via definition. This is a common misconception of conservative views toward minority groups. I find it much m
459.
▲
by
docmars
5y ago
>If I was in a same sex marriage I would feel very, very uncomfortable working at a company that "bans politics" when a large number of my peers thinks my spouse is "unnatural". What's especially important to rem
460.
▲
by
docmars
5y ago
I wholeheartedly disagree with just about everything you said (much of it is misinformation and/or hysterics), but I appreciate you sharing your thoughts. :)
461.
▲
by
docmars
5y ago
I believe Google is more concerned with combating the apparent world-ending risk of someone discovering misinformation and parsing that information themselves ( gasp ), than providing a useful search engine to the majority who are using it
462.
▲
by
docmars
6y ago
Heh, if that isn't the most hypocritical award given in a hot minute. That's the only thing I can say about this in good conscience. Susan: un-ban every political dissenter you've removed in the last 2 years and then we can t
463.
▲
by
docmars
6y ago
I believe you, but what makes this illegal? I'm not familiar with the laws or protections around this.
464.
▲
by
docmars
6y ago
This gave me a good laugh, thanks for that ;)
465.
▲
by
docmars
6y ago
These are all wonderful questions, and my only answer to them is that grace, patience, bearing with one another, and the courage & honesty to confront what doesn't feel right have all been made high virtues throughout time for a re
466.
▲
by
docmars
6y ago
Got it—I misunderstood you—thanks for clarifying. Words and labels have become a very difficult thing for people to handle rationally. Within a span of just 5-10 years, a big handful of them went from being tools to bond people to being a d
467.
▲
by
docmars
6y ago
Are you suggesting that those in the Black community using the N-word isn't in good faith? I don't think generalizations like these are useful or productive because they contradict themselves when you apply any other context to th
468.
▲
by
docmars
6y ago
I think that's a pretty loose assumption that _all people_ are using it with ill intent. Anything can be said or used with ill intent, because intent matters and is separate from actual language. That's why we have tone in speakin
469.
▲
by
docmars
6y ago
Huh, I remember a certain "conspiracy group" that was demonized and declared a terrorist organization trying to think more deeply about a theory like this. Now a mainstream media outlet publishes this and nobody bats an eye. Pun i
470.
▲
by
docmars
6y ago
Awesome, now do charts! ;)
471.
▲
by
docmars
6y ago
I agree -- and I'd venture to say that the sentiment could be alluding to the fact that mistakes and things overlooked in software development are inevitable. Don't take this for defending him, but it's in the realm of possib
472.
▲
by
docmars
6y ago
Which may be indicative there is not enough data available to support a conclusion, so a person operates with the information most available to them, which may count as a contribution to that data ultimately.
473.
▲
by
docmars
6y ago
I'm skeptical of the idea that availability of decentralized services should be dependent on the activity of a market driving it. If for some reason, something unfavorable were to happen with that market, the services tied to it would
474.
▲
by
docmars
6y ago
That's fine. We've got Gab :)
475.
▲
by
docmars
6y ago
I think this applies to a whole lot more than tech. ;)
476.
▲
by
docmars
6y ago
Good riddance, I guess?
477.
▲
by
docmars
6y ago
Brilliant!
478.
▲
by
docmars
7y ago
I love this, and that a major value in it is feeling refreshed. I think I'm going to try this a bit, time-permitted, and ask for forgiveness later if there's ever an issue. I'm constantly finding gaps in my knowledge that my
479.
▲
by
docmars
7y ago
And another reason why DRM absolutely sucks.
480.
▲
by
docmars
7y ago
Fin-all-y, Apple. Took you 4 years to release a notebook with a sensible keyboard. Sass aside, thank you. I'm very pleased!
More ›