Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
docker_up
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
91.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
He is a hero, period, end of story. If you listen to the recording, and watch the computer simulation, it's crazy what he did and he did it with complete calmness.
92.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
there's a million different things you can do. You can simply strip out all links. You can strip out links and only allow white-listed links, etc. Once the site has been vetted then it could be allowed to be clicked on. Or you can just
93.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
You can strip the links and replace them with a man-in-the-middle link so that you couldn't just directly click on the link.
94.
▲
A Legal Loophole May Leave Some Rock Riffs Up for Grabs
(bloomberg.com)
26 points
by
docker_up
7y ago
|
10 comments
95.
▲
Ridiculous GE video showing 14 steps to reset a GE smart lightbulb
(finance.yahoo.com)
2 points
by
docker_up
7y ago
|
1 comments
96.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
Change the name. Any other solution is foolish and short-sighted. A terrible name is something that is haunt you for the rest of your time at the company. Just have the page links properly managed so that they mention the new name and the o
97.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
A good example of why HTML emails need to be downgraded to plain text in financial companies, and links stripped and checked before it's shown.
98.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
The reason why I never used it is because it tied my gmail address to the Google+ account, and it forced a Real Name policy. I didn't like how dictatorial it was, and with Facebook around, there was no need to have to bow to Google and
99.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
There's a common belief among conspiracists/Zerohedge believers that the amount of physical gold is basically fraudulent, and that the gold that is being traded doesn't exist. So when the coming financial crisis happens and g
100.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
Maybe he was hoping to get intercepted, not be completely ignored. That would make his last flight even more epic.
101.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
I am preparing myself for a week of onsite interviews as we speak. Of course I hate them, but what other choice do I have? The biggest problem is that the questions are so random and span almost anything. Will I get asked: a pthread questio
102.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
Lego has more value than you think. You can at least sell it by the pound for pretty good price. https://www.vocativ.com/underworld/crime/lego-heists/index.h...
103.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
There is a funny Simpsons scene where Marge and Homer don't fight in front of Lisa and Bart. Instead they go into the car and argue/fight, because they thought that fighting in front of the kids would be bad. Instead of protecting
104.
▲
Ta-Nehisi Coates Revisits the Case for Reparations
(newyorker.com)
3 points
by
docker_up
7y ago
|
2 comments
105.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
After going through my dad's computer while trying to fix it for him, I realized that there are a lot of things I really don't want to know about my parents. Everything I know about them is enough. Digging through their texts, the
106.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
This type of attitude is typical, where one likes to dismiss new ideas and keep status quo instead of coming up with new ideas or innovations. The point is that there is an opportunity for the Steve Jobs of health care to come up with a way
107.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
Maybe figure out a better way to verify that doesn't require biopsy? Maybe use machine learning in conjunction with better data? I don't know enough but there must be other techniques we could devise that don't require major
108.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
Why is this not available? It's ridiculous that we can't do this conveniently. All I read about is new tests and detections, etc and they are only available when it's too late. Things like pancreatic cancer and liver cancer a
109.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
That's a term used on Reddit /r/cscareerquestions, it's basically FAANG
110.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
I'm almost 50 myself. I've been coding for 25+ years, and am looking for a new job myself. I have one at a well-known company but I want to make more hay while the sun shines. I currently have a week of onsites booked with the Big
111.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
We aren't in disagreement, and I don't take your comment as a challenge, it was exactly something we went through with this feature. The point is, who gets to decide what "good enough" is? The difference between my "
112.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
Softbank is essentially a PE fund now. Their numbers don't represent the same things that they do for a regular company. https://techcrunch.com/2018/11/06/softbanks-debt-obsession/
113.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
Right, but who decides what "good enough" is? If I weren't code reviewing, then it would have passed as "good enough". And that's the point of why just saying good enough isn't good enough. There should be
114.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
When I code review, I differentiate between "code quality" and "opinion". First off, there needs to be a coding standard guideline so that 80% of all issues of "opinion" vs "coding standard" are well
115.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
> Understood as senior: Legacy code that I wrote myself is hard to read. For me, any code that I wrote more than 3 weeks, I forgot. That's why I comment the hell out of my code. The younger programmers have routinely told me "c
116.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
Overall a good article, but I completely disagree with the notion that "good enough is good enough". I've been in a lot of code reviews where developers push back because it's "good enough". You need to maintai
117.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
The one thing that the author forgot or didn't realize to mention is: Test moving your environment between service providers in production. You should be able to failover from one provider to another, in a predictable way. You should a
118.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
This answer is nonsensical. Yes there are vast swaths of people who are living in areas that are much poorer than the US. But that doesn't mean we need to measure ourselves based on the poorest of the world. Does that mean that we shou
119.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
My kids asked me this and I said we are "comfortable". We are easily 1%-ers in terms of income level but we don't consider ourselves rich. I consider someone rich who has the luxury of not working and still maintaining a very
120.
▲
by
docker_up
7y ago
0.4% seems high when a sustained rate of 1% will get you kicked off VISA and Mastercard anyway.
More ›