dmux

41 ms·

421.
by dmux 10y ago
I'm interested in this as well. Doesn't this go against Rob Walling's advice in "Start Small Stay Small" as well as Peter Thiel's advice in "Zero to One"?
422.
Deep Spec: The Science of Deep Specification(deepspec.org)
2 points by dmux 10y ago|0 comments
423.
by dmux 10y ago
How would you go about doing something like this in a booming housing market like the Boston area?
424.
by dmux 10y ago
I'd highly recommend Dr. David West's "Object Thinking" book. It does an excellent job of (1) describing how most programmers who use an OO language fall into writing "small Cobol" programs and (2) how to avoid
425.
Static typing and interoperability (2014)(essencesharp.wordpress.com)
2 points by dmux 10y ago|0 comments
426.
by dmux 10y ago
You mention learning a lot about compiled languages, and mention afterwards being able to understand packages. How are those two related?
427.
by dmux 10y ago
Part of the clustering is planned: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Spine
428.
by dmux 10y ago
Check out Leo Brodie's "Thinking Forth" I read both The Pragmatic Programmer and Code Complete (2ed) before Thinking Forth. The latter provides a wonderful software engineering foundation (in clearer, more concise language to
429.
by dmux 10y ago
<3
430.
by dmux 11y ago
Wrong. He is most definitely talking about Perl.
431.
by dmux 11y ago
This is gold.
432.
by dmux 11y ago
Complete list of mistakes in the design of CSS: 1. CSS
433.
by dmux 11y ago
Do you actually know programmers who literally just take specs and implement them and have no thoughts or opinions about the larger context of what's going on? Sadly, yes. I've found this to be the case with most outsourced deve
434.
by dmux 11y ago
First off, there's the "you ain't gonna need it" philosophy [0]. And secondly, how do you know they're "super cool" additions? Talk to your users and let them decide how valuable these features are. [0] h
435.
by dmux 11y ago
The latter is programming right?
436.
by dmux 11y ago
>they are defined on source code level and can be freely used in different runtime components... To me, components and services are two completely separate abstractions. A component is a collection of code -- a module -- that can be dupl
437.
by dmux 11y ago
Currently in the process of separating several monolithic applications into services. We've found success in identifying individual "resources" that are present and common in each of the monoliths. Once identified, we impleme
438.
by dmux 11y ago
Not exactly "production" software, but we've started using Tcl as a cleaner alternative to Bash.
439.
by dmux 11y ago
integer?
440.
by dmux 11y ago
Forth is a stack-based point-free[1] programming language where Scheme is a functional programming language. Both Forth and Lisp/Scheme offer functional composition. Forth is similar to Smalltalk in that they're both a live progra
441.
by dmux 11y ago
Excellent book as an introduction to Software Engineering. Also, Forth is a fun language/live-environment to play around with. When I first started using Forth (Gforth) the live-programming matched with point-free programming is left w
442.
by dmux 11y ago
If on a Winter's Night, a Traveler -- Italo Calvino
443.
by dmux 11y ago
His last name is Simmons. And the Hyperion Cantos is an excellent series. His other books are worth reading too: Summer of Night, The Terror.
444.
by dmux 11y ago
Do you know if the attaching to a remote instance is available in Racket? I spent some time learning racket a year or two ago, but was under the impression they took out some of the really cool features (or I never discovered them)
445.
by dmux 11y ago
In regards to the first quote, I find it helpful having both the data structures and algorithms in one "cage." I like having all relevant data in one easy to find location.
446.
by dmux 12y ago
I agree if we're talking about a conglomerate, but how many individual corporations can coerce other corporations into handing over information?
447.
by dmux 12y ago
I think this is what Andrew Hunt and David Thomas meant when they said "program _into_ a language" as opposed to "program in a language" in their book The Pragmatic Programmer.
448.
by dmux 12y ago
I'll just leave this here: http://seir.sei.cmu.edu/sheard/Life%20Cycle%20Silver%20Bulle...
449.
by dmux 12y ago
Ah yes, the "good" programmer that is well versed in when goto statements are warranted.
450.
by dmux 12y ago
You're right, probably not a cause for "panic," but would the phone rock when placed on a flat surface?

More ›