dmn322

13 ms·

91.
by dmn322 4y ago
Why is this something we would want? We don’t have enough say as it is
92.
by dmn322 4y ago
There’s 2 ways this could go: 1) create enough of a safety net or give people enough cash that they can start businesses taking advantage of the increased productivity of ai 2) austerity: let them get fired from jobs in failing industries w
93.
by dmn322 4y ago
It’s on purpose. They knew what they were doing
94.
by dmn322 4y ago
Lots of people just aren’t in a position to be turning down jobs. If you want to judge people by the jobs they take, set up enough of a social safety net that reasonable people can’t get screwed by a short run of bad luck.
95.
by dmn322 4y ago
Is it kind of like events getting emitted and handled? I'm just a little fuzzy on what's creating the data/request/effect, and then where it's sending that once it's created, and then where the "drivers&q
96.
by dmn322 4y ago
ok so would it be correct to say this is sort of like handling an event that gets emitted? Sorry, I know no clojurescript, so I'm having a hard time parsing it even googling the syntax
97.
by dmn322 4y ago
Real conversations with real strangers are tit for tat. Going overboard coming up with a bunch of catchy bs is not helpful in finding real people. The one thing that got me from almost no dates to dates all the time was just going places m
98.
by dmn322 4y ago
I said hey all the time when I was on the apps. It’s a perfectly normal way to start a conversation with a stranger in any other context, and plenty of girls don’t mind. There’s like an 80% chance of rejection anyway, I’m not coming up wit
99.
by dmn322 4y ago
Can you give an example of what you mean by side effects as data?
100.
by dmn322 4y ago
Not to mention the fed raising rates any time pay starts to go up. Because of the “natural rate of unemployment” that is artificially enforced
101.
by dmn322 4y ago
I agree with you that it’s extremely unbalanced. However, i would say that a decent enough safety net would make most of that irrelevant. The problem is that our livelihood depend on the empathy of employers, when in reality empathy doesn
102.
by dmn322 4y ago
I agree. The only reason it’s “inhumane” to lay people off is because of our horrible safety net and ridiculous cost of education. If we could solve those issues, then we wouldn’t need any loyalty from companies. Imagine if we had that i
103.
by dmn322 4y ago
To the extent that markets are efficient, they’ll be replaced by companies who are willing to dump employees when it’s not profitable to keep them. That’s the system we’ve chosen for ourselves so far. To the extent that some companies are