Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dmitriid
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
301.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
It wasn't an inefficiency. It was a way to give users nice scrollable lists with large tap targets on tiny mobile screens.
302.
▲
Strava raises prices but can’t tell you how much it costs anymore
(dcrainmaker.com)
110 points
by
dmitriid
4y ago
|
6 comments
303.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
> At the end of the day all stock market returns come from one's of 3 things None of which really reflect reality, and rely on basically pure speculation. They also depend on the stock to go up up up up. > Over the long run the s
304.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
> That's one of the beautiful things about share-based compensation (from a shareholder angle). The problem with shares is that they have become (or maybe have always been) a purely speculative asset. They rarely reflect the reality
305.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
Personal anecdotes from any big company :) There's a second layer to the tragedy. Also applicable to any big company: - many teams are overstaffed for what they do/produce - many teams are understaffed for what they do/produc
306.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
Where file handling is concerned, there are at least - File System Access API, https://wicg.github.io/file-system-access/ - File Handling, https://github.com/WICG/file-handling/blob/maste
307.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
The tragedy of Twitter is that: - they were absolutely undoubtedly overstaffed - Musk's approach was absolutely undoubtedly insane shenanigans of a stupid rich cry-baby Both are true at the same time
308.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
Hail science https://youtu.be/tl55gVXsBZE
309.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
> As others have pointed out the standard is here: As others also pointed out, it's a different standard. File System: Mozilla isn't opposed File System Access API: considered harmful There are parts (of whichever spec) that
310.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
Keyword: after they scaled up. First they became Facebook :)
311.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
Most of the stuff we used is based on some very boring tech. It may get upgraded to something fancy when the product/service scales to a significant number of users, but Spring+Postgres (or RoR, or Django, or PHP...) will get you there
312.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
That's why I wrote this: "in true Google fashion Chrome team implemented and released at least three different APIs all having something to do with files." :) I didn't want to dig through all of them on mobile when I was
313.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
It's a good idea, or at least originally it was a good idea. In reality it devolved to, well, see the links I provided. Edit: Note: those three are the ones I remember because I was reading about them at the time, or participating in s
314.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
Chromium is open source but is not community-developed.
315.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
I literally provided just some of the examples. Those are easily verifiable. Web Transport is shipped by default. What was the input from other browsers? Here's the timeline for HID: https://github.com/mozilla/stan
316.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
A great article on this, Breaking the Web Forward https://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2021/08/breaking_th...
317.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
That's a nice sentiment at the link. The reality is that Chrome ships hundreds of APIs with little to no input and only barely notifies other browser vendors that "yeah, we're shipping it". We're literally in the
318.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
> I'm developing a system which uses webapp to interact with device over USB. It works in Chrome. It's sad for me to not support Firefox As a cautionary tale: the moment Firefox shipped support for a hardware API they immediate
319.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
> If core functionality doesn't work Somehow "everything that Chrome ships" is core functionality now > broken or slow on Firefox but work fine on Chrome. Somehow you blame Firefox for this. Even though "only works
320.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
> What happens is that one browser (usually Chrome) implements a useful new feature. What happens is Chrome releases a Chrome-only non-standard (at a rate of 400 APIs per year). It cobbles together a barely legible spec [1], and then use
321.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
> Let's hope FireFox starts to support the File System Access API soon. File System Access considered harmful, will not be implemented: https://mozilla.github.io/standards-positions/ Note: in true Google fashio
322.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
So now you'll download megabytes of wasm. Because the browser has very little of what you need, and you need to bring all your world with you, all the time: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34218520
323.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
> I only see React framework authors ignoring Web Components. See how you ignore everything I write even though I wrote it in the very first reply: "there are multiple reasons why none of the major frameworks and very few of the new
324.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
To keep beating the same tired old drum: despite literally hundreds of millions of dollars poured into development and promotion of Web Components... the results are at best meh. The two leading frameworks, Lit and Stencil, see very little
325.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
To misquote the author of Solid.js as I remember it: --- start misquote --- There's no wonder react has been popular for all this time. We needed a time of relative stability and gradual evolution. We don't need revolutions every
326.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
> Yeah, because yelling against Web Components in every forum thread is so much more productive. I'm not yelling. I'm pointing out facts. > regardless if they are at their foundation or not. So why are they not used as a fou
327.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
AngularJS doesn't use web components as their foundation. VueJS doesn't use web components as their foundation. So you're not asking why. You're ignoring the question and burying your head in the sand.
328.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
Sweden has the rule of "at least 3 seconds". Because you keep ignoring the speed, and the braking distance as well. Edit: and assuming perfect conditions when the driver is perfectly alert and looking ahead. And is young and healt
329.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
It takes humans up to 5 seconds to even start breaking in the presence of danger. Even at 40 miles per hour your speed is 58 feet per second (or, at 60kmh you speed is 16 meters per second). So it's either "the driver had suffic
330.
▲
by
dmitriid
4y ago
> I wouldn't say that you need to reinvent any framework. You do, when you need at least slightly more complex. > The main critique I can think of is that Web Components provide many ways to do things Nope. The main critique is t
More ›